God-o-Meter

McCain Leaves Door Open to Pro-Choice VP

Thursday August 14, 2008

Categories: John McCain

ridge.jpgThis is not going to make the Christian Right happy. Not one bit.

Just as the movement's leaders were starting to warm up to John McCain, after years of being nauseated by him, the Arizona senator goes and sticks his thumb in their eye, suggesting that he's not ruling out a pro-choice running mate, namely former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge. From the AP:

"And also I feel that -- and I'm not trying to equivocate here -- that Americans want us to work together," McCain added. "You know, Tom Ridge is one of the great leaders and he happens to be pro-choice. And I don't think that that would necessarily would rule Tom Ridge out."

What's so dangerous about that statement regards to McCain's relationship with the Christian Right is that it was a statement that McCain made four months ago about likely ruling out Tom Ridge as a running mate because of his pro-choice views that made many top movement activists really warm up to him for the first time in a long time. It came on an exchange with Chris Matthews on an episode of Pennsylvania that was being broadcast live from Pennsylvania:

MATTHEWS: Let me ask you about your Republican party. You've been a maverick, and a lot of people like you because of that. I want to ask you how much of a maverick you are. Would you put a person on the ticket with you, like the former governor of this state who is very popular, Tom Ridge, even though he may disagree on the issue of Roe v Wade and abortion rights? Would you put somebody on the ticket like that, on that one issue? Would that stop him?

MCCAIN: I don't know if it would stop him, but it would be difficult. I just want to say that Tom Ridge is one of the great Americans. He served in the Vietnam War. He served in Congress. He served as a great governor of this state. I am proud to call him my friend.

MATTHEWS: Why that one issue? Why is it that one litmus test issue?

MCCAIN: I'm not saying that would be necessarily, but I am saying it's basically the respect and cherishing of the right of the unborn is one of the fundamental principles of my party. And it's a--and it's a deeply held belief of mine. But I just want to say, again, the admiration and respect and affection that I have for Tom Ridge--he and I came to the Congress together many years ago. And I can't tell you how much I admire him.

Here's how Family Research Council senior vice president Connie Mackey responded at the time to God-o-Meter, when asked if McCain was stepping up his outreach to Christian conservatives:

He did "reach out" in the one-hour interview with Chris Matthews at Villanova University when he said that choosing a "pro-choice" vp would be difficult because the Republican party is concerned about the welfare of the unborn and the he has a deep commitment to the protection of the unborn himself.
Now it looks like Christian activists like Mackey might have been reading too much into McCain's April statement. Unless he does some damage control around this, look for conservative evangelical and Catholic activists to start griping about the maverick again, just like in the days of yore, before James Dobson started dangling the possibility of a McCain endorsement.

2

Advertisement
Comments
Paul, seeking wisdom.
August 14, 2008 2:59 PM

What have I been saying all along, the GOP doesn't give a rats ____ about the pro-life agenda. If McCain chooses Tom Ridge the Religious Right might as well pack their bags and leave town. Who will the Catholic league support now, and Dr. Dobson will have to bite his tongue and look at what is good for the country instead of his fight against the "evil" democrats.

Maybe a viable third choice will emerge from the wreckage, not much chance though.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

About God-o-Meter

This blog is no longer updated and is closed for comments. We welcome your comments about politics in our Politics forums.

The God-o-Meter (pronounced Gah-DOM-meter) scientifically measures factors such as rate of God-talk, effectiveness—saying God wants a capital gains tax cut doesn't guarantee a high rating—and other top-secret criteria (Actually, the adjustment criteria are here). Click a candidate's head to get his or her latest God-o-Meter reading and blog post. And check back often. With so much happening on the campaign trail, God-o-Meter is constantly recalibrating!

God-o-Meter blogger Dan Gilgoff is Beliefnet's Politics Editor. A former political correspondent for U.S. News & World Report, he is author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War.

Search This Blog

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.