The monologue of the Religious Right is over and a new conversation has begun! Join the God's Politics dialogue with Jim Wallis and friends Brian McLaren, Amy Sullivan, Diana Butler Bass, Tony Campolo, Obery Hendricks, Noel Castellanos, Robert Franklin, Shane Claiborne, and others.

Get e-mail updates



About Jim Wallis
Read His Bio
Events
Press Coverage
Multimedia
Books
Get Sojourners

Archive
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
Add to Technorati Favorites
On Beliefnet
Blog Heaven
Quizzes
Prayer of the Day
Inspiration
Meditations
Prayer Circles
Memorials
News & Society
Home
Huffington Post
Crooks and Liars
TalkingPointsMemo
Street Prophets
Andrew Sullivan
Cross Left
Think Progress
Emergent Village
Bene Diction Blogs On
Chuck Currie
Commonweal
Connexions
The Parish
Faith and Policy
Faith in Public Life
Faithful Progressive
First Born Son
Gathering in the Light
I Am a Christian Too
Imitatio Christi
Jesus Politics
Latino Leadership Circ.
Perspectives
PhaithofStphransus
Philocrites
Pomomusings
Prodigal Sheep
ProgressiveChristianAl
ProChristBlogNet
Public Theologian
Sonafide
Talk To Action
The Anti-Manichaeist
The Corner
Theoblogical
Theoblogy
Waving or Drowning
Willzhead
XpatriatedTexan
 
 
 

Duane Shank: Politicizing Ford's Passing?

Judging from your comments, my piece on the passing of former president Gerald Ford seems to have rubbed some people on both sides the wrong way. Some think that by contrasting his decency and honesty to the current administration I don't realize "how rude it is to politicize someone's passing." And, comparing one Republican president to another somehow made me partisan. Then there are some who thought his pardoning of Richard Nixon was wrong and apparently wanted more criticism of Ford.

For the record, I think the news headlines these past few days, referring to his "legacy of honor," "legacy of healing," - and the editorials, "Ford and forgiveness," "reconciler-in-chief," "profile in decency," etc. are symbolic of a real yearning in the country for those qualities. Our current situation is so polarized that the decency, integrity, and honesty of President Ford, for which he is and should be remembered and honored, are seen as unusual. There are not many politicians today, of either party, who can claim those attributes.

In yesterday's Chicago Tribune, a piece by senior correspondent William Neikirk concluded, after talking with friends and associates of President Ford, along with political analysts from both parties, that "a moderate conservative like Ford would have a hard time governing in today's harsh political climate where both parties seem at each other's throats, analysts said.
In the recent midterm elections, voters appeared to send a message that they were fed up with divisiveness in Washington. As a result, politicians with some of Ford's abilities for bridging the partisan divide could find greater support than once believed."

The political world in Washington has become so bitter that simple friendships between Members of Congress of different parties are almost non-existent. President Ford belonged to an earlier era where there could be vigorous disagreements, but still strong friendships across the aisle. A story in today's New York Times told how "As he helped in recent years arrange the details of his own funeral, Gerald R. Ford reached out to an old adversary: Jimmy Carter , who defeated him for the presidency in 1976. Skip to next paragraph Mr. Ford asked whether his successor might consider speaking at his funeral and offered, lightheartedly, to do the same for Mr. Carter, depending on who died first."

And as for politicizing his passing, it's interesting that Ford himself gave two interviews in which he was strongly critical of the current administration, but stipulated that they be embargoed until his death. Seems to me that in doing so he politicized his own passing. In the Washington Post, Bob Woodward recounts: "Rumsfeld and Cheney and the president made a big mistake in justifying going into the war in Iraq. They put the emphasis on weapons of mass destruction," Ford said. "And now, I've never publicly said I thought they made a mistake, but I felt very strongly it was an error in how they should justify what they were going to do."

As the weekend of his lying in state is about to begin here in Washi ngton, I honor the memory of a good and decent man. His wife, four children, seven grandchildren, and four great-grandchildren are in my prayers.

Duane Shank is senior policy adviser for Sojourners/Call to Renewal.

 
 

 
Recent Posts
Diana Butler Bass's Books of the Year
Duane Shank: Daily News Digest
Duane Shank's Books of the Year
Verse of the Day: Oppression is for Losers
Ryan Beiler's Books of the Year
Voice of the Day: Merton on Protest
Bart Campolo's Books of the Year
Becky Garrison: The New Athiests' Blasphemy Challe...
Duane Shank: Daily News Digest
Verse of the Day: Pure Religion
 

 
Explore Beliefnet
News & Society
Today's Headlines
Complete Politics Coverage

More Faith & Politics
Interview with Jim Wallis
Conservative Blogger Rod Dreher
Responding to a blog post? Read our Rules of Conduct first.