Adam Taylor: Making Good on Our Promises to Africa
On Wednesday President Bush made a second major speech on the crisis of HIV/AIDS announcing a major commitment to double U.S. funding for global prevention and treatment programs around the world to reach a level of $30 billion over another five years. We should applaud this increased funding and the way in which President Bush has made fighting AIDS in Africa arguably the most positive part of his legacy. Even as we celebrate, though, we must also bear in mind that even this bold step will fall short of stemming this epidemic.The crisis of HIV/AIDS continues to outpace even our best response, with an estimated 4.3 million new infections last year. The epidemic tracks the fault lines of poverty and vulnerability. The real U.S. share of the cost of meeting the global need to fight AIDS is more in the order of $50 billion by 2013, which would include continuing to provide life-prolonging treatment to one-third of the people in clinical need.
The president made his announcement in advance of the upcoming G8 summit, which takes place in Heiligendamm, Germany, from June 4-6. The German Chancellor Merkel will preside over an agenda that includes a focus on global warming, primary school education, and the crisis of extreme poverty.
Since the 2005 G-8 summit at Gleneagles raised the bar for global leadership, this year’s summit faces a crisis of expectations. With the exception of the U.K. and Japan, other G-8 nations, including the United States, have dragged their feet in realizing many of the solemn promises made to the continent of Africa, the largest of which was to double the levels of aid by 2010. Collectively, G-8 assistance to sub-Saharan Africa has increased by only $2.3 billion since 2004, instead of the $5.4 billion promised.
Tragically, promises are much easier to make than to keep. While the U.S. has made important steps toward increasing its aid through the Presidential Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the Millennium Challenge Account, and contributions to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB, and Malaria, the U.S. must increase its aid by nearly $1 billion in order to remain on track.
At the turn of the new millennium, the global AIDS crisis was only beginning to grab headlines and prick the conscience of our nation. I was converted to the cause of ending AIDS by the opening remarks of Judge Edwin Cameroon’s speech at the International AIDS Conference in 2000 in South Africa, when he prophetically said, “I represent the inequality of this world…because of my job and skin color I had access to drugs that brought me from the brink of death back to life…. But this disease still represents a death sentence to the majority of people living in poverty across this world.” These words highlighted in sobering terms how a preventable and treatable disease like AIDS must lend the urgency necessary to bring an end to extreme global poverty.
Through media savvy and celebrity-driven efforts like the ONE campaign, the cause of ending HIV/AIDS and extreme poverty has become more widely embraced. Seven years ago, it would have been almost impossible to imagine regular commercials featuring your favorite movie stars or a millions calling in to American Idol to raise awareness and money to fight poverty and AIDS in Africa. While we have reached a tipping point in public awareness and even public opinion, we are far from a tipping point in public action. Changing the politics of delay and incremental leadership will also require a dedicated constituency of committed leaders who are willing to put their faith to the test. Join us in taking action in advance of this year’s G-8 meeting by joining forces with Archbishop Desmond Tutu in telling G-8 nations to keep their promises to Africa!
On June 6, the leaders of the wealthiest nations will meet in Germany at the G-8 Summit. But this is not just any meeting. It's a meeting where life and death decisions will be made, affecting the lives of millions of people.
You can help. Join Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu and tell G8 nations to keep their promises!
The commitments made by the G-8 leaders in 2005 on poverty, aid to poor countries, HIV/AIDS, health systems, and education, are solemn promises, made to impoverished people. Breaking these promises is morally unacceptable. Yet, the G-8 is not on track to keep these promises:
- Less than half of all people in urgent need of AIDS treatment by 2010 will be receiving it;
- 77 million children have no access to school; and
- Africa alone faces a shortage of nearly 1.5 million health workers.
Tell the G8 leaders they must get AIDS and education funding back to the promised level. Take Action!
Thank you for making a difference!

Adam Taylor is director of campaigns and organizing for Sojourners/Call to Renewal.









Add to Newsvine




Comments
Has it ever occurred to anyone that aid to Africa is not a solution in itself? Aid is no good when all those billions of dollars are going to corrupt leaders. The countries that get the most foreign aid also have the leaders with the largest limousines. Governmental reform must go hand-in-hand with aid, or there's no use subsidizing dictators and criminals.
Posted by: Ben Wheaton | May 31, 2007 10:14 PM
Adam, Thank you for providing this "take action" opportunity!
Posted by: Mike Hayes | May 31, 2007 10:25 PM
Thanks to Mr. Taylor for his well-thought-out analysis. I notice that many liberals seem to be struggling to make this move by Bush, along with the recent Sudanese sanctions, seem bad in some way; thank you for managing to be critical while at the same time fair. Ben, you make a good point, but the question then becomes---how? How do those who wish to give charity make sure that it really goes to those it's supposed to, and how do we deal with those who would abuse others' good deeds? Anyone have any ideas? God bless.
Posted by: Joey | June 1, 2007 12:06 AM
Why no mention of the UN? They are the world organization that has all the ability to deal with all gov't and leaders. The US and other G8 countries do not have diplomatic relations with several of the countries of the world but the UN does. Why isn't the UN putting together a program that could deal with the distribution of monies and medical supplies? Might it be that there is no money to be made in this area so no one wants to be bothered with it? (you tell me) Just as the US should not be the Police of the world according to some - if we can't be the police then I don't think we should be sending out health care workers when we can't protect them. Have a great day - .
Posted by: moderatelad | June 1, 2007 4:05 AM
Over the past five years, since the G-8 mtgs were held in my backyard here in Canada, I have been involved in several conferences featuring Stephen Lewis who has just completed a term as Kofi Annan's special envoy to Africa for the AIDS crisis. I strongly recommend a visit to his website at www.stephenlewisfoundation.org for some of the clearest and most informed commentary on what the UN is doing regarding the crisis and why the G-8 countries are NOT doing what they committed to doing years ago.
Posted by: canucklehead | June 1, 2007 4:58 AM
canucklehead | 05.31.07 - 11:03 pm | # sorry - but I am suspect of anyone who is connected with Kofi after what has come to light about his time as SG of the UN. There are others that I listen to about the needs of Africa that I will consult before I would go to him. Kofi has a lot of blood-money on/in his hands and he will need to answer for that in the future. Have a great weekend! .
Posted by: moderatelad | June 1, 2007 2:59 PM
ROTFL! Kofi Annon's 10-year run as Secretary General of the UN ended only 5-6 months ago. That degree of skepticism pretty much rules out any details divulged by the UN about any ongoing AIDS programs. Would you like to know what the UN has been doing for the past six months?
Posted by: Unsympathetic reader | June 1, 2007 5:22 PM
Mod-Lad: Keep your head buried right where it is!
Posted by: canucklehead | June 1, 2007 8:05 PM
Ben Wheaton One thing that really does not help is submission to futility. The U.S. and Soviet Union fought proxy wars and supported petty dictators in the promotion of our ideologies. Having spent a considerable amount of time in Africa, I ve seen some of the results of the rewards that were doled out to these pawns Mobutu s Zaire and post-Dergue Ethiopia, for example. I don t deny that aid money is misused. Much has been written on that subject. See Graham Hancock s book The Lords of Poverty. Hancock points primarily to people within the aid agencies themselves who benefit from our well-intentioned donations. Yesterday I was in the medical school bookstore and saw Do no harm: how aid can support peace or war (Anderson, M. B., 1999 http://www.rienner.com/viewbook.cfm?BOOKID=88&search=do%20no%20harm) as the required text for an international health course that I m considering taking as an elective for my MPH. There is a lot of work to be done in Africa, and a lot of mistakes have been made along the way. Some of us are committed to doing that work, which implies we must also learn from the mistakes that have been made in the past as well as our own mistakes. Peace!
Posted by: neuro_nurse | June 1, 2007 8:39 PM
Oh yes, speaking of dictators supported by the U.S. government, I also lived in Iran in 1978 under Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi.
Posted by: neuro_nurse | June 1, 2007 11:05 PM
canucklehead | 06.01.07 - 2:10 pm | # My head is not buried nor is it up something. I am just skeptical about anything the Kofi has to say because of what has come out about his handling of what I consider significant issues that the UN should have taken head on and did not. Also his making money on several issues that were 'sanctioned' by the UN. Hopefully the new guy will be better - that is not raising the bar much but we could hope. Have a great day - .
Posted by: moderatelad | June 4, 2007 8:42 PM
Your understanding of how the UN operates seems to give the SG much more autocracy than he/she in fact has. Therefore, I repeat, I strongly recommend a visit to Stephen Lewis's website at www.stephenlewisfoundation.org for some of the clearest and most informed commentary on what the UN is doing regarding the crisis and why the G-8 countries are NOT doing what they committed to doing years ago.
Posted by: canucklehead | June 5, 2007 6:19 AM
canucklehead | 06.05.07 - 12:24 am | # The G-8 has some catching up to do on some issues. But the UN is so far behind what it should be doing that they make the G-8 look very progressive. The UN - the tail is wagging the dog too much. They need to revisit their charter and get back to the basics. Have a great day! .
Posted by: moderatelad | June 5, 2007 2:40 PM
Do you wanna wager some dough on what the G8 will do about Mr. Putin and his missile plans?
Posted by: canucklehead | June 5, 2007 7:02 PM
not so concerned about Putin as I am about the nut in North Korea or that lamebrain in Iran. They will use their nukes when they finally get them. They will get them if we rely on the UN to keep the world safe. Blessings .
Posted by: moderatelad | June 5, 2007 8:08 PM
Post a Comment
Are you aware of our Rules of Conduct?