Happy (No) New (Nukes) Year! (by Jessica Wilbanks)
The day after Christmas, President Bush signed an omnibus spending bill containing a major victory for all those committed to a world free of nuclear weapons: the complete elimination of funding for the Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW) program. This program would have led to a new generation of nuclear warheads, and possibly a new nuclear arms race, under the guise of ensuring the reliability of current nuclear warheads.
Congress saw through the program—despite its euphemistic name—and so did the American public. When a reporter for the San Francisco Gate stopped Californians on the street last year and asked them what name they would have picked for the Reliable Replacement Warhead program, he received some spot-on answers, including, "Stupidly Provocative Warhead," "The Let's Kill Them All Warhead, and, "An Efficient and Comprehensive Instrument of Death and Destruction."
Whatever the administration called it, the Reliable Replacement Warhead program represented yet another effort to build newer and more usable weapons of mass destruction. (Ironically, the administration's funding proposal for the program came at a time when tensions between the U.S. and Iran over Iran's nuclear energy program were at an all-time high.) When will our political leadership realize that as long as nuclear weapons exist, we'll be living under the threat of nuclear annihilation?
Many Christians have been working to eliminate nuclear weapons for longer than I've been alive. These immoral weapons of mass destruction have robbed us of our security ever since the first one was exploded in the desert of New Mexico, less than an hour from my house. In over half a century, we haven't seen a whole lot of victories. But last year, former Secretaries of State George Shultz and Henry Kissinger, former Secretary of Defense William Perry, and former Senator Sam Nunn laid out a bold new vision for a world free of nuclear weapons—thus bringing tremendous new energy to efforts to lift the nuclear threat once and for all.
And now, instead of funding the administration's request for the RRW program, Congress is demanding a new evaluation of nuclear weapons strategy for the 21st century. As it turns out, our current nuclear weapons policy hasn't been updated since the Cold War.
It's truly time for a change. Until the elimination of nuclear weapons becomes our number one priority, we're likely to see the Reliable Replacement Warhead program, repackaged in shiny new wrapping paper, coming up again year after year.
Jessica Wilbanks is the coordinator of Faithful Security, the National Religious Partnership on the Nuclear Weapons Danger.






Add to Newsvine




Comments
Devil's advocate question: couldn't it be argued that the existence of nuclear arsenals among the major powers was and is the factor that's keeping the major powers from starting World War III? After all, with the administration's superhawks (esp before the Iraq fiasco) always seeking to dominate the world, if they felt that a conventional WWIII against the rest of the world was "winnable," wouldn't they have pulled the trigger long ago?
(Before someone accuses me of an anti-US bias, let me say that superhawks exist the world over, and the same argument can be used in any country.)
Posted by: Ngchen | January 11, 2008 3:17 PM
The Vision of a world free of nuclear weapons is NOT new.
It began in 1986 when Mordechai Vanunu, the 21st century Jeremiah sang that tune when he exposed Israel's underground WMD program in the Negev.
Israel has yet to admit international inspectors into the leaking Dimona plant which is endangering the health of its citizens and is at the very root of instability in the Mid East; for it is human nature to desire what the other has acquired.
Israel has never signed the NPT, but Iran and all the Arab states have.
Israel continues to get away with their big lie by practicing nuclear ambiguity and also defies the essence of democracy: freedom of thought, speech and movement.
This civilian journalist has been following Vanunu's historic year and a half long freedom of speech trial and six month conviction for speaking to foreign media in 2004.
On January 7, 2008, the day before Vanunu's appeal was scheduled to begin, Israel backed down and sentenced him to six months of community service instead.
This civilian journalist has been and will continue to stream 2005 and 2006 video of Vanunu on WAWA.
I will persist in the good fight to raise awareness of the 21st century Jeremiah, until he receives justice; liberty; FREEDOM from captivity in Jerusalem and his vision of a nuclear free world becomes reality.
Eileen Fleming,
Reporter and Editor WAWA:
http://www.wearewideawake.org/
Author "Keep Hope Alive" and "Memoirs of a Nice Irish American 'Girl's' Life in Occupied Territory"
Producer "30 Minutes With Vanunu"
Posted by: eileen fleming | January 11, 2008 3:27 PM
The reaon the US And every other country wants nukes is the same given in 1998 by Bal Thackeray, the head of a militant Hindu party. "We have to prove that we are not eunuchs,"
Posted by: Don Gisselbeck | January 11, 2008 8:35 PM
Post a Comment
Are you aware of our Rules of Conduct?