Enemies of the State (by Anna Almendrala)
The Philippines Armed Forces have been implicated in most of the recent human rights abuses that have occurred in that country (almost 800 unlawful executions since 2001). Journalists, activists, pastors, and lawyers have been kidnapped, tortured, or even gunned down in public for daring to advocate on behalf of the economic, social, and civil rights of the poor.
But since 9/11, the U.S. government has given the Philippines army $245.6 million for "foreign military financing," "anti-terrorism," and "international military education and training." This is more military funding than any other country in Asia receives. As American taxpayers, we should be outraged that the U.S., through massive military funding, extends carte blanche to a government that cannot control and discipline its own national army –an army that carries out personal vendettas and hit lists en masse. As members of the body of Christ, we should lament when our brothers and sisters are cut down in the mission field – especially when we helped to bankroll it.
In my previous blog post about the disappearance of Jonas Burgos, I mentioned that the Farmers' Alliance he volunteered for had been labeled an "enemy of the state" organization. The military did this to justify the half-hearted investigation conducted on his disappearance. This and other incidents have alarmed the United Nations Human Rights Council, especially since the Philippines has (strangely) just been granted a seat on the committee. In keeping with the strictures of committee membership, the Philippines is set to undergo a kind of human rights audit called the "Universal Periodic Review" on April 11, 2008.
After Ecumenical Advocacy Days, Edita Tronqued Burgos planned to tour the U.S. to speak to Filipino-American communities about the things going on back home. In her increasingly hopeless search for her activist son, she has stumbled upon a new mission: to put American taxpayers and citizens in contact with their U.S. congresspersons about the issue. The work of Edita and others like her have made the extrajudicial killings a more high-profile issue, and there were even hearings in the U.S. Congress about it last year. Still, positive change seems elusive in 2008 as military aid to the Philippines increased by "a few million," with $2 million earmarked for human rights issues. Seems to me like we're trusting foxes to guard the henhouse here.
To read more about American military funding to the Philippines, click here.
Anna Almendrala is the marketing and circulation assistant for Sojourners.









Add to Newsvine




Comments
Anna --
Do you think we justify supportting them to fight rising Islam? I realize we've been friends for a long time as a nation, but it just strikes me as curious.
The Philippines have a special place in my heart, so I thank you for this post.
Posted by: frankie | April 9, 2008 5:44 PM
This is an excellent example that shows that we do not trust God, but men.
Posted by: Oak | April 10, 2008 12:25 PM
> As American taxpayers, we should be outraged that the U.S., through massive military funding, extends carte blanche to a government that cannot control and discipline its own national army
If you think this funding extends "carte blanche", it means you either don't understand the rules associated with FMF and IMET, or you don't understand the definition of carte blanche. That being said, it's important that the Philippines government develop the capacity and will to hold its people accountable. Things appear to be moving in the right direction, but much progress is needed.
Posted by: bill | April 10, 2008 7:43 PM
Yet again people are being abused by the locally powerful. It’s Ok, as long as they are our "Bastards". Yet come the revolution be it communism, some acute unfriendly nationalism, that nationalises the mines, oil fields and banks, or Islam or what ever we will hear people saying why did this happen?
As it has happened many times before, unless you give people hope and extend a valid social civil contract to them, they have no interest in supporting oppressors.
If my memory serves me right, there were proposals in the original setting up of the UN for miliary forces/ police forces to deal with out of control regimes. Ie those who were abusing their citizens (The Holocaust comes to mind and the discussion of the 4 mill dead in recent wars in the Congo on TV here last night). Obviously this has come to nothing.
I feel that a complete black ban on such countries for a short period, ie pull all communications - electronic, to find and freeze all accounts in all banks world wide to hurt the elite where it matters, plus indictment at the International court of justice is possibly the cheapest solution. However this will require political will.
Sure the offshore banks, Swiss etc will complain. Just pull their communications completely and see how long before they will allow inspections of the accounts.
Look at the stir when some bank accounts details were released from a Liechtenstein bank recently. Certainly stirred up a few people in Australia when the tax office sent some please explains. Yes cheating on tax is stealing from your fellow citizens.
Is it time to consider using the UN charter of human rights as dynamic rule with the International court as a point of reference? However even some of the first world nations may have to explain why there is abuse (by neglect only I hope) of the mentally ill, racial minorities, and stolen generations etc. Bit close to home. No, will the elites always be unaccountable and protected?
When will we wake up? "Who is our neighbour?"
Posted by: JohnH | April 10, 2008 11:48 PM
Post a Comment
Are you aware of our Rules of Conduct?