September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006

Subscribe
RSS Feed
On Beliefnet
Blog Heaven
Quizzes
Prayer of the Day
Inspiration
Meditations
Prayer Circles
Memorials
News & Society
Home
 
 
 

Response to Zack Exley: Avoiding 'Resident Alienation' in Pursuit of New Humanity (by Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove)

Dear Zack,

First of all, let me say thanks. I’m so grateful for the honest questioning of a convert to Christianity who seems to intuit Jesus’ radical politics. Your story is such good news to me. I grew up among good Christian people who put our hope in Ronald Reagan while we prayed for the souls of atheists like you. It’s so refreshing to know that God opened your eyes to the kingdom movement despite our wayward piety.

Second, let me try to correct a misunderstanding that was probably the result of my poor communication. I did not mean to say, “No, I think we’ll stay local now” when I wrote that the authenticity of our public witness, which must be transnational, depends on our faith that God has already given us a new way of life in local, everyday practices. I only wanted to say that I’ve learned we can’t really say much to the state house or the White House if we’re not repenting of the evil in our own house. Jesus said it like this: Before you try to take the speck out of your neighbor’s eye, take the log out of your own.

Realists and radical democrats have criticized the “resident alienation” of intentional communities that separate themselves from society to maintain their own purity apart from the world. I think they’re right, and I pray that new monasticism will never fall into this temptation. We cannot get away from this world’s systems to carve out a utopia. But God has interrupted history to make a new creation possible right in the midst of the old. We’re called to interrupt the world with signs of a new humanity right where we are.

You are right to say that the gospel has leavened society to some degree by democratizing it. This is a result of radical Christian witness. Though it has not ushered in the kingdom, democracy is better than its alternatives. But we are always susceptible to self-deception. And we can easily confuse the pursuit of happiness with the desire for God’s beloved community.

This is, I’m afraid, the failure of the success of the civil rights movement. A movement that was inspired by a vision of beloved community where all people have dignity because they are children of God was “democratized” into a civil rights movement that promised the American Dream to the "talented tenth" of the black community. This meant that most of those who could leave black communities did, leaving neighborhoods without the resources of educated and professional people. Without any connection to the local community, the young men and women who gained access through the movement achieved some political power but effected little change.

People like John Perkins of the Christian Community Development Association have helped me to see that the political hope of the God movement is both more radical and more effective when it stays committed to the grassroots and to the practice of entrusting everyday people with the tactics of Jesus. You’re right: We ought not let the empire hold our imaginations captive by believing that the gospel is only personal. But neither should we imagine that we can jump to good national and global policy without being transformed ourselves. The call to conversion is total. We desperately need new imaginations as well as a whole new world. The good news is that God has already made all of this possible in Jesus. I hope we can struggle to live into it together.

Peace to you,
Jonathan

Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove is the author of New Monasticism: What It Has to Say to Today's Church (Baker).

 

Comments

Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove wrote:

I grew up among good Christian people who put our hope in Ronald Reagan while we prayed for the souls of atheists like you.

For the most part, the good Christian people I grew up with put their hope in Christ, even while they voted for Reagan.

It's really unfortunate that this otherwise thoughtful post had to start off with a pot-shot like that, especially since this remark does little to explain the rest of what is written.

Oh well. That was an interesting thought on the civil rights movement, and I'd be interested to hear folks expand on that.

Wolverine

When Reagan said that people are basically good, I knew that this was not a Christian stand.

Jonathan: I grew up among good Christian people who put our hope in Ronald Reagan while we prayed for the souls of atheists like you.

Wolverine: For the most part, the good Christian people I grew up with put their hope in Christ, even while they voted for Reagan.

Wolverine, the folks I was working with during that time most certainly did put their hope in Reagan, as a man led by Christ to take over the Presidency and move this country back in a godly direction. And, given enough time I can go back and get volumes and volumes of quotes, speeches, sermons, and writings from a plethora of conservative Christian leaders of that era who agreed with that position.

Jonathan's statement was not a pot shot, Wolverine. It is his experience, and it accurately describes what I saw as well as a Republican college student during those times. Reagan was an answer to prayer, and people mobilized behind him because of that.

As for making sense, if you read the two posts that are linked to from this one, it makes a lot more sense.

RJohnson,

One can believe in Christ, and at the same time think that Christ is leading some individual (Like Ronald Reagan, or Jim Wallis, or Barack Obama) in the work that he or she is doing.

Wolverine

Wolverine: "One can believe in Christ, and at the same time think that Christ is leading some individual (Like Ronald Reagan, or Jim Wallis, or Barack Obama) in the work that he or she is doing."

True enough. But when one puts more effort into electing said person to a position of power than in living out and sharing the Gospel message that empowers that person, trouble can begin.

I am of the opinion that much of the discord among the conservative evangelical community now is the result of God intervening to remind people of the priority of His Son over political party.

The misplaced piety that Jonathan mentions is something that I witnessed and participated in during the 80s and 90s. I'm thankful that God has led me to a much better understanding of His Word, His Son, and His will here on this earth. As I read Jonathan's words I hear a similar voice of thankfulness for a similar personal realignment of priority in his life.

I'm in deep agreement with most of what Jonathan says, but I feel there is an attitude lurking in the following sentence that I'd like bring out. "But neither should we imagine that we can jump to good national and global policy without being transformed ourselves." Of course I believe that we must be personally transformed in order to be able to work for just policies. But I don't believe that we should wait for that transformation before acting at those levels because I think we transform ourselves into people with a global gospel vision by acting globally. Concretely, I mean actions such as anti-war protests, pro-union rallies, and direct aid to organizations such as Courage to Resist. If we refrain from this type of action in exclusive favor of "acting locally", the practical political effect is to reinforce the idea that Christianity is a "personal" spirituality that has nothing to say about the massive issues that confront us globally.

If you would like to see a deeper analysis of the implications of Jonathan's viewpoint, please take a look at http://nonviolentjesus.blogspot.com/2008/05/reply-to-jonathan-wilson-hargrove.html
It seems to me the "new monastics" may be making some of the same mistakes as the old monastics of whom I was a member.

"I am of the opinion that much of the discord among the conservative evangelical community now is the result of God intervening to remind people of the priority of His Son over political party."

Al though I completely agree with your statement in the prior paragraph where you assert that one can put much more effort (as some of our conservative friends have done in the past) into a political movement that mobilizes our beliefs in the social arena and too little like-sized effort to promoting the Kingdom of God - yet the next in the next paragraph (the one pasted here) I draw a different opinion. I don't see it as God exacting some form of punishment to those with misplaced priorities yet I see it as simply reaping what you sow in just one of the many areas of life where this occurs.

Wolverine: "It's really unfortunate that this otherwise thoughtful post had to start off with a pot-shot like that, especially since this remark does little to explain the rest of what is written."

I whole-heartedly agree with this statement - It was an unfortunate use of this vehicle on Jonathan's part im am otherwise excellent follow up article.

My intent was to start my comment out with the word All and not Al....

Is it possible to believe that politics can also be redeemed?

Post a Comment

Are you aware of our Rules of Conduct?







 

 
Recent Posts
God's Politics Has Moved!
Just the Facts (by Jim Wallis)
A Colombian Peacemaker's 'Option for Civil Resistance' (by Janna Hunter-Bowman)
Beyond Just War Theory (by Valerie Elverton Dixon)
Verse of the Day: 'Stand at the crossroads'
Daily News Digest (by Duane Shank)
Voice of the Day: Lawrence Kushner
Ohio After Ike: On the Ground, In the Dark (by Virginia Lohmann Bauman)
Ten Reasons Why This Election Should Be About Issues and Not Personalities (by Jim Wallis)
Catholic Bishops Denounce Immigration Raids as Anti-Family (by Jennifer Svetlik)
 
 
 

 
Explore Beliefnet
News & Society
Today's Headlines
Complete Politics Coverage

More Faith & Politics
Interview with Jim Wallis
Conservative Blogger Rod Dreher
Responding to a blog post? Read our Rules of Conduct first.