Dalit Converts to Christianity Face Persecution and Violence (Unveiling India's Apartheid, Part 3, by Adam Taylor)
As you were singing carols, placing the last presents under the tree, and worshiping at a Christmas Eve service this past year, Indian Christians halfway across the world were being victimized by the largest attack on the Christian community in India's democratic history. The complex and combustible layers of caste-based oppression and religious persecution came to a head on Dec. 24, 2007, through a spate of violence in the Kandhamal District of Orissa state. During the course of a four-day campaign of terror, more than 100 churches were damaged, at least 700 homes were destroyed, and thousands of Dalit and tribal Christians were forced from their homes.
As preparations were being made to celebrate Christmas, Christian leaders approached the police ...
... seeking to delay a strike organized by Hindu radicals designed to disrupt their celebration. In the town of Brahminigaon, Dalit converts to Christianity have enjoyed greater social and economic empowerment, which threatens the social order put in place through the Hindu caste system. These Dalit and tribal Christians were beginning to own shops and repudiate their inferior status. According to Christian Solidarity Worldwide, the violence was rooted "in a long-term campaign to Hinduise a tribal population, which involved the vilification of religious conversions to Christianity." Hindu nationalists and extremists had been fomenting violence in the region, pitting the majority Hindu population, who are from the lower castes but still maintain a higher position in the caste order than Dalits and tribals, against tribal and Dalit Christians. The police, siding with the non-Christian community leaders, decided to allow the strike to proceed. The stage was set as tensions between the Christian and non-Christian communities reached an apex. On the day before Christmas, the rampage began after a dispute in a local market. Churches and homes were targeted with impunity. The people of Kandhamal awoke on Christmas Day gripped by fear as the attacks escalated and spread across the district. Reportedly, no churches held worship services for several weeks.
I prayed with a tribal leader who recently converted from Hinduism to Christianity. Because of his conversion he was given a choice by Hindu extremists to either re-convert to Hinduism and be spared or have his home destroyed and be killed. He courageously chose his Christian faith and fled his village. Five months later, after having rebuilt his home with his own meager resources, his report filed with the police remains unanswered and his community continues to face intimidation and threats.
The state of Orissa is one of seven states in India that have passed anti-conversion laws, which severely curtail conversions. In most of these laws, there are particularly severe penalties if Dalits or Tribals change their religion without prior permission from a district magistrate. Even though these laws arguably violate the Indian Constitution's protections for religious freedom, they remain in place. Under India's constitution, Dalits are entitled to affirmative-action benefits, including 15 percent of all federal government jobs and admissions in government-funded universities. Tribals who convert to another religion maintain their affirmative-action privileges. In contrast, Dalits that convert to a religion other than Sikhism, Buddhism, or Hinduism are stripped of these affirmative-action benefits, called reservations. India's Supreme Court is currently reviewing several challenges filed by Christian and Muslim Dalits that could result in an overturning of the affirmative-action exclusion. A separate bill to remove the restriction is pending in Parliament. Government members, influenced by India's 150 million-strong Muslim community, have indicated their cautious support.
The Dalit struggle and Christian persecution is inextricably tied to a broken and biased justice system that fails time and time again to prosecute perpetrators of crimes. Just as all politics are local, all justice seems locally administered in India. According to local leaders, six months after the attack not a single perpetrator has been brought to justice. While dozens were arrested, most have been released and no leaders were implicated. Meanwhile, many communities live under the constant specter of intimidation and fear. Women in one village described being threatened and chased by Hindus living in adjoining villages anytime they tried to bathe or wash clothes in a nearby lake.
Dalit Christians who assert their rights and claim their equality pose a direct threat to the established caste system. Many Dalits are turning to Christianity, attracted by the message of a God who made everyone equal. A cover story in The Wall Street Journal last year reported that, to the dismay of Hindu nationalist groups, the number of India's secret Christians has climbed in recent years to an estimated 25 million, about the size of the officially registered Christian population. According to Dr. Joseph D'souza, AICC president and DFN international president, "Conversion is the way of revolt taught to the Dalits by their champion and liberator, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, a lawyer educated in the U.S. who turned to Buddhism himself. His writings are well-known all over India among the Dalits. Amdedkar clearly called for the Dalits to convert in order to escape caste-based humiliation and discrimination. In response, some Dalits probably convert due to a motivation to simply protest, but the Christian faith demands that the church receive all -- including Dalits -- who want to follow Christ."
While the vast majority of Hindus in India are friendly or ambivalent toward Christians, Hindu fundamentalist groups led by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP, the World Hindu Council) are instigating violence and exacerbating tensions. Most Rev. Raphael Cheenath, archbishop of Cuttack-Bhubaneswar, offered a critical insight into how the church must respond, saying the "church needs to open itself up to all sectors of society," arguing that the future security of the church rests in its ability to build real relationships throughout the Hindu community.
During our sojourn through Khandhamal, we stayed at a Catholic training center that was spared during the attack, in large part due to Hindus in the area who protected the center. The center had opened its doors to Hindu organizations, allowing Hindus to sponsor trainings, events, and conferences. According to Archbishop Cheenath, "the church must learn to teach the gospel without demeaning Hinduism and serve the community without proselytizing."
Other acts of violence targeting Christians are much more sporadic and smaller in scale, lacking the gravity and scale to grab headlines both in India and across the world. Catholic lay leader and AICC Secretary John Dayal said that, unfortunately, "the conscience of the world is driven by numbers." On the other hand, attacks each year on Dalits are around 25,000. And there are probably thousands that are unreported. Yet Hindu religion casts a protective shadow over the plight of the Dalits. The Western world is reluctant to fully engage in the Dalit struggle due to fears of being accused of religious intolerance, cultural insensitivity, and sheer ignorance. However, a pernicious distortion of the Bible was used to sanction the systems of Jim Crow in the South and apartheid in South Africa. However, the world can't escape the harsh reality that oppression against Dalits is inextricably linked to the Hindu-based caste system within India. Indians must ask whether Hinduism can survive without caste? Prayerfully, the answer is yes.
Adam Taylor is the senior political director for Sojourners.
Learn more:
India's Burning Issue, by Joseph D'souza, Christianity Today (online only), Jan. 10, 2008
Briefing India: Religious Discrimination and Violence in 2007 against Christians, March 2008 by Christian Solidarity Worldwide
In India, 'Untouchables' Convert To Christianity -- and Face Extra Bias, by Yaroslav Trofimov, Wall Street Journal, Sept. 19, 2007









Add to Newsvine




Comments
Mother Teresa must be weeping in Heaven at the treatment of her children, the little ones of India.
In a democratic Nation such as India, that such treatment is given to their own to maintain a caste system of oppression is vile.
Yes, our own treatment of others has in the past put a black mark on Christians in the world, but we can learn from our errors and can be forgiven of our sinful actions and attitudes.
Leadership and the Courts of India must act quickly to stem the tide of oppression and persecution of it's citizens, this was the dream of Gandi
Posted by: Paul Shiras | July 3, 2008 6:37 PM
well, you have two choices: whine about it or stop trying to convert the world (to Christianity, democracy, etc.). There is an irrational belief in the Christian part of the world that says, "everyone wants to be free, and everyone, deep down inside, wants to be like us." This is utter nonsense. Neither democracy (as understood in the West) nor Christianity work for everyone. Time to give up conversion to the cause and work on fixing your own house. As a Buddhist in the midwest US, I have to hide my religion because it will cause people to avoid me, deny me my rights, and in general dislike me (a few exceptions apply). Being the arrogant, self-righteous people you tend to be, it's not surprising that the Hindus don't want you coming in to foist your beliefs on them.
Posted by: Christopher Mohr | July 4, 2008 10:10 AM
You apparently fail to understand the point being made. First is the fact that religious persecution is going on. Second is the fact that religious persecution is not right, regardless of who is being persecuted. The post was not about Democracy, and it's not about "everyone wanting to be just like us."
So for religious freedom to really exist, people should be allowed to speak about their religion and to seek converts. I don't know about Buddhists, but Christians have a religious *duty* to try to spread Christianity, even if other people don't like it. No one is saying the Hindus have to "like it." We're simply saying that the Hindus should tolerate it. Likewise, we should (but sometimes fail to) tolerate the Hindus spreading of Hinduism.
Christopher Mohr wrote:
well, you have two choices: whine about it or stop trying to convert the world (to Christianity, democracy, etc.). There is an irrational belief in the Christian part of the world that says, "everyone wants to be free, and everyone, deep down inside, wants to be like us." This is utter nonsense. Neither democracy (as understood in the West) nor Christianity work for everyone. Time to give up conversion to the cause and work on fixing your own house. As a Buddhist in the midwest US, I have to hide my religion because it will cause people to avoid me, deny me my rights, and in general dislike me (a few exceptions apply). Being the arrogant, self-righteous people you tend to be, it's not surprising that the Hindus don't want you coming in to foist your beliefs on them.
Posted by: Ngchen | July 4, 2008 2:22 PM
Fellow Spiritual Sojourner (Christopher Mohr),
I want to say thank you for adding to this discussion. I appreciate you coming out of your comfort zone and expressing viewpoint that has not been stated. A viewpoint that I believe is missed in the article and shared by those (Hindus) that it is written about. It is true that Christians have very little to boast about the efforts to convert Hindus and the fact that most communities have been left unresponsive to the Christian faith should cause people to look to your response and other criticisms for answers why. The idea that the British colonial system was above reproach and the ancestral (caste) system is inherently evil has to be challenged in the minds of Christians. Actually the Israelites of the Old Testament in the Bible were broken down into ancestral tribes each had its own function and the priest tribe (the Levites) was given special task and even received taxes from others… I am not sure how to justify colonial system from the Bible, but Christians must know that conversion is seen as arm of colonization to many Hindus.
Again Christiopher your discussion here is most helpful. I hope that others will see the value of your input.
Thanks from a fellow Spiritual Sojourner
Posted by: Matthew | July 4, 2008 9:26 PM
Ngchen - I understand that you feel a duty to convert others. What I'm saying is twofold: religious persecution is everywhere and religious freedom involves letting people come to conclusions for themselves. Freedom is not something you can give or take away. You want to stop people from (wisely) following their own system and defending what is theirs? What arrogance.
First, clean up yourself. It is only after you have understood that your beliefs are not the best way (or even the right way) for everyone that you realize what an atrocity conversion is. It is the penultimate denial of the very religious freedom you seek to spread. The reality is, most people who you go in and convert only convert because they are getting material support to do so, and if that were taken away, they wouldn't bother. They have a system and it works for them. Leave it be.
Matthew - I thank you for your words. I agree, the answer to the questions of why conversion has failed so utterly in places like India and Japan, which is an even bigger disaster for Christians, is entirely too simple. No matter how "bad" (or uncivilized or repressive or un-Christian) we think the system is, it works for them. We need to let it alone and strengthen our own faith.
All - The best way to get people to follow your way is to demonstrate how it would benefit them without conversion. In short, do not evangelize, do not proselytize. Let the goodness of your way come forward without making any efforts at all, show them by your actions that your way is better, but don't do so seeking "fresh meat" for your pews. Do so without fear or favor, without arogance or material benefits. In short, practice what you (don't) preach: humility is stronger than any other force.
And in case you're wondering if I'm being hypocritical, I'm not. I have zero intention to convert any of you to Buddhism. You'd be better off following whatever way works for you, without me interfering.
Posted by: Christopher Mohr | July 4, 2008 10:10 PM
It's sad to see anyone from anywhere being prevented from shareing their culture, art and religious values with others as a way of teaching tolerance, outreach and humility. What seems to get feathers so ruffled in nations where Christianity is growing is the feeling of loss of tradition, which is an erosion of the fabric of any given people's history.
History often defines the values of a religious order by looking back and copying the past as a memorial to our cultural underpinnings. We celebrate the lives and love of our ancesters with pride,but also should allow our children to observe their historical culture and see where they feel new ways would suit new changes in the people. Human culture evolves, and with it human religion must navigate each new horizon with grace and an understanding of what their faith requires of them to carry it forward as a strength and positive infuence in society, without disrespecting the past or loseing the essensce of goodness, fairness and love, which should guide every faith.
Just as Buddists may not see Christ as needed to be their savior ,the Dalia Lama, none the less , talks of Buddism being an illumination of truth and meditative living which opens it's adherants to enter into any religious faith which they see as fitting their culture or personality in addition to the tenets they follow in Buddism.
Christians living in a caste system is not condusive to the feelings of Christian adherants about the equality of each human regardless of faith or social status. God loves all equally, and as spitritual entities, where we are enjoined to others with the bonds of spiritual love and interdependent gifts which serve the whole, we all consider the needs of every other as just as important as our own needs and wants. This is where grace is needed for those of every faith in accepting and seeking to understand the ways of others as a measure of love for them , which always shows rerspect and humility as a hallmark of spiritual love.
Posted by: jerry gates | July 5, 2008 7:56 AM
jerry - and you think that the Dalai Lama speaks for Buddhists? He is irrelevant in the Buddhist world, excepting Tibet. What he says, he says for the Western world. The rest of the Buddhist world, especially Asia, ignores him.
As for seeking to understand the ways of others...how about you start with not asserting your beliefs, and actually listen. How about moving past the notion that you should teach others about your grace through Christ and see that they have their own grace without him. That's what I'm getting at. Stop trying to push your beliefs on others because you think your beliefs are better. We get along well enough without you.
Posted by: Christopher Mohr | July 7, 2008 8:45 PM
Christopher, love is all. Not all Xns are anti-Buddhist. Not all Xns try to convert those whose spirit is filled with compassion. One can be both Xn and Buddhist. Or not. When harm occurs, oppose it, whether it's the harm you've encountered, the harm of a Zimbabwean whose body is maimed or life snuffed out for politics, the harm of a Dalit Xn whose home or church or body is attacked ... or anyone at all.
Posted by: marilyn | July 10, 2008 7:35 PM
Two stories about Dalits. I met a reporter for Science magazine at a press conference whose name was Jordan but he definitely had Indian parents. When I noted that I had been born in Lucknow (India), he said that was the region of India where his father taught. As for his name, he explained that when his father became a Christian, he decided to choose a Christian name and that the River Jordan seemed to be most suitable. I mentioned that to my father the next month and he said that during the first year he was a missionary teacher in Alahabad, India, he came down with small pox and that the only perosn who helped him was a teacher by the name of Jordan, the reporter's father.
The second story was told me by a woman at a reunion of Woodstock School students. Her parents were sent out as missionaries in the 1920s to run an orphanage where most of the children were "untouchables". They questioned what they should teach these children since none of them would be able to work. After studying the situation, they decided to teach them how to cook for Westerners since no Hindu would cook Western style dishes. As a result, their graduates readily got cooking jobs in Western tourist hotels. Now that's wisdom.
Posted by: James Harrington | July 11, 2008 12:44 AM
Post a Comment
Are you aware of our Rules of Conduct?