September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006

Subscribe
RSS Feed
On Beliefnet
Blog Heaven
Quizzes
Prayer of the Day
Inspiration
Meditations
Prayer Circles
Memorials
News & Society
Home
 
 
 

Speeches are Fine, but Real Change Takes a Movement (by Troy Jackson)

It was a warm spring afternoon when Martin Luther King addressed tens of thousands gathered in front of the Lincoln Memorial, the largest gathering to date in the growing struggle for civil rights.

King rallied the crowd with his stirring refrain: "Give us the ballot!" He called for the government, white liberals, white Southerners, and finally the African-American community to work, struggle, and sacrifice to achieve a more just, free, and integrated nation.

But more than 50 years later, few remember this speech delivered at the "Prayer Pilgrimage for Freedom" on May 17, 1957. But the nation and the world are very much aware of a speech King gave only six years later at the very same location.

Why do we remember the 45th anniversary of the "March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom," while largely ignoring a very similar march that occurred six years earlier?

For one, King's speech was better. "Give us the Ballot" is no "I Have a Dream." The speech helped cement the moment in our national consciousness.

Second, the media coverage was much more extensive in 1963 than it had been in 1957.  Thanks in part to media coverage, the August 1963 march became part of the national consciousness.

Also, the crowd was much larger. While exact attendance figures at such events are always disputed, the 1957 march drew around 20,000, while the 1963 event drew between 200,000 and 300,000 people.

But the biggest difference between 1957 and 1963 was not the quality of the speech, the media coverage, or the size of the crowd. No, these were mere consequences of a much bigger transformation.

In 1957, the march was an attempt to rally the nation around an issue. Building on the Brown vs. Board of Education decision and the Montgomery bus boycott, civil rights leaders tried to leverage their strength to exert pressure on the federal government. But in 1957, there was not yet a national grassroots movement for civil rights.

Although local communities were stirring and organizing, the 1957 march was at the dawn of the movement, and therefore did not galvanize the strength that would be obvious just six years later.

So what changed between 1957 and 1963?

1. The Sit-In Movement of 1960, which galvanized college students throughout the south to submit to physical abuse and arrest to ensure integrated lunch counters in southern dime stores.

2. The founding of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, which provided a network of young civil rights activists who would be on the front lines of the movement throughout the 1960s.

3. The Freedom Rides, which forced the federal government to enforce national laws that called for integrated bus services on intrastate travel. When black and white riders were abused, beaten, had one of their buses firebombed, and eventually filled the jails of Mississippi, the nation became more aware of the courage of the African-American community and the horrific violence of segregationists and white supremacists.

4. The Birmingham Movement, where Bull Conner unleashed firehoses and police dogs on African-American children, leading many in the nation to the conclusion that integration and racial justice could be delayed no longer.

By 1963, a grassroots civil rights movement had emerged. The march represented the culmination of day-to-day organizing in small towns and cities throughout the South. Many in the crowd had been beaten, arrested, abused, lost jobs, and were reviled because of their courageous work for social change.

So we remember King's "I Have a Dream" speech and the 1963 March on Washington not because of a grand event or even a great speech, but because it was an event that galvanized grassroots power built throughout the South and throughout the nation. The 1963 march was not a tactical PR move, but a culmination of a movement that transformed our nation.

As we watch people fill arenas in Denver and the Twin Cities, many will be inspired as we listen to compelling speeches from both Democrats and Republicans. But remember, a collection of tens of thousands of people responding to a grand speech never changed anything, anymore than the millions who will gather for NFL and college football games this fall will have a great social impact on our world.

Speeches and conventions are fine, but the real social change happens on the ground, in our local communities, person-to-person, small group to small group, neighborhood by neighborhood. Jesus didn't usher in the kingdom of God at the Sermon on the Mount, but through a ragged group of disciples who changed the world.

During this election season and beyond, as Christ-followers, I pray we don't get so swept away by a few great speeches that we fail to do the hard work in our local communities that can help "God's kingdom come, God's will be done, on earth as it is in heaven."

Local organizing made all the difference between 1957 and 1963. In 2008, local organizing will determine if we have a national "feel-good" moment when we elect an African-American president or a female vice president, or whether we experience a transformed nation and a transformed world.

Troy Jackson is senior pastor of University Christian Church in Cincinnati, a graduate of Princeton Theological Seminary, and earned his Ph.D. in United States history from the University of Kentucky. He is author of Becoming King: Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Making of a National Leader, and a participant in Sojourners' Windchangers grassroots organizing project in Ohio to work on the Vote Out Poverty Campaign.

 

Comments

FYI

M

A friend pointed me to this post, and its similar to what I was thinking in my latest post on my blog. Enjoyed it thanks.

www.emergingconversation.com

Great article, Troy...I only hope Rudy Giuliani or Sarah Palin get a chance to read it since they seem to think "community organizers" don't really do anything...

Posted by: Scott Brazil | September 4, 2008 3:20 PM

That is not true - Obama points out his community experience in what seems to be the 'hall mark' of his career. Palin and Rudy have been Mayors and Palin a Gov. These are positions where you were elected to the position and the people asked you to give leadership. You took an oath when you accepted the responsibility. Comm Org's are most likely appointed and have little power compaired to the Mayor or the Gov.

Personally - I like BHO in many ways. His resume is a little thin. He needs to go back to IL and be the Gov. or show up to the Senate for a few more years and have a track record that can be reviewed. Two books and very little legislation that he personally authored. Signing on - that is a no brainer - authoring, that takes work.

Blessings to all.
.

Big guy, I take it you didn't watch last night's RNC...I don't disagree at all the government roles are essentailly elected community organizers...the point was that last night, Rudy and Sarah (mostly Rudy though) decided to suggest in their mocking comments that community organizers are really not doing anything, and Troy's article really suggests the opposite...

For the record, I would like to quote David Plouffe's response to their condescending remarks, which seems to be in line with Troy's blog post: "Community organizing is how ordinary people respond to out-of-touch politicians and their failed policies"...Amen to that!

Good stuff Troy! We got some really good news about our work in the East Aurora community today. My hope is that we look back on this day as significant day that many celebrate in the future. Dave

Good stuff Troy! We got some great news yesterday regarding our work in the East Aurora community. My hope is that this will be a significant day that many will celebrate in the future! Dave

Thank you for keeping me posted with your articles. I enjoy'em very much.
And as always you give good food for the thought!
Tito
(Give Amanda and the Kids a hugh for me!)

When Barrack Obama is sworn in in January 2009, he will have had roughly the same amount and the same type of experience that Lincoln had in March of 1861.

Unfortunately he will also be taking the reins from a predecessor who managed to really screw things up!

Hi all,

As many have mentioned here and elsewhere Obama's 'executive' resume is not so thin when compared to many recent Presidents.

Hey, how many were on the staff when he headed the Harvard Law Review? How long ago was that? What was his age then? What were his opponents busy achieving then?

It is amazing that handpicked Sarah Palin should be compared to Obama. Especially so when her other shortcomings are excused with the wonderfully appropriate words: "life happens". That sort of sums up her fairy tale ascent. "Life happens". Sort of like 'fate'?

And, comparing a 72 year old candidate's resume with a 47 year old's is not the way to elect Presidents, or anyone, not even here in Africa, where old age is venerated!

I would imagine that winning one of the two major party's nominations for President is an organizational achievement of the highest order.

Ask McCain. Obama did it on his first attempt against formidable opponents. And it didn't just "happen".


- Alu
Dar es Salaam

clearly you miss the entire point of the mlk speeches; not only to rally a people, but to give a voice to people who had none. motivation being words which echoed the voices of millions who were at the least hopeless, in a society that did not want them or felt they were not even humanely needed.
obama offers to the world as mlk did a united front one where we are not judged by the color of our skin but by the content of our character, or the red/blue liberal/conservative dogma that has polarized this nation or to be swept up in the cultural politics of today. Jesus stated how can you say you love me whom you've never seen but hate your brother who you see everyday?
this country and it's people are hurting not because of a democrate or republican being in office, but because men and women don't care about the very people they are sworn to serve- the people who day in and day out go to work, pay bills, take care of their kids, pay taxes and are taken advantage of, by credit card lenders, bankers,insurance companies,we face inflation without increase in wages, more taxation than that of the wealthly, little or no healthcare, unafforable healthcare, the cost of food, gas,and ultlites are extremly high.
when i vote as a child of God, a concerned citizen, a wife a mother a daughter. i am voting based on what is best for this country. morality can't be legislated, we all have choices, serving Jesus is a choice one in which he has given us all; knowing this one day we will be judged based on his word.
i will make the correct moral choices no matter who is in office, but the president needs to represent all the people.i want someone whose character integrity and convictions won't allow him to be swayed by what is popular but by what is right. we have seen and now feel the results of a very ineffective 8 year run. experience has taught us it's time for change. wake up america. do we really want to continue down this path?

Post a Comment

Are you aware of our Rules of Conduct?







 

 
Recent Posts
God's Politics Has Moved!
Just the Facts (by Jim Wallis)
A Colombian Peacemaker's 'Option for Civil Resistance' (by Janna Hunter-Bowman)
Beyond Just War Theory (by Valerie Elverton Dixon)
Verse of the Day: 'Stand at the crossroads'
Daily News Digest (by Duane Shank)
Voice of the Day: Lawrence Kushner
Ohio After Ike: On the Ground, In the Dark (by Virginia Lohmann Bauman)
Ten Reasons Why This Election Should Be About Issues and Not Personalities (by Jim Wallis)
Catholic Bishops Denounce Immigration Raids as Anti-Family (by Jennifer Svetlik)
 
 
 

 
Explore Beliefnet
News & Society
Today's Headlines
Complete Politics Coverage

More Faith & Politics
Interview with Jim Wallis
Conservative Blogger Rod Dreher
Responding to a blog post? Read our Rules of Conduct first.