Anti-Christian Violence in India (by Benjamin Marsh and Adam Taylor)
Last week Catholics, Protestants, Muslims, and world governments (including our own) publicly spoke out on an issue that has barely broken through the international news. On August 24, a massive program of violence against Christians began in the Kandhamal district in the Indian state of Orissa after a Hindu leader, Swami Saraswati, was killed by Maoist rebels. Retaliatory violence has claimed at least 25 lives and sent 10,000 Christians fleeing into the jungle. This is the same region that was torn apart by violence instigated by Swami and other Hindu extremists against Christians on Christmas Eve of last year. Ben and I had the honor of visiting the area this past June on a delegation trip in which we interviewed families and witnessed firsthand the degree to which justice has been denied to thousands of people who lost their homes, churches, and sense of security. Even then it was clear that the root causes of the violence had not been fully addressed and that the situation remained a volatile one without stronger state intervention to pursue justice and foster reconciliation.
According to the All India Council of Churches, "The Christmas 2007 attacks claimed the lives of at least four Christians, and we verified the destruction of at least 105 churches and 730 Christian homes. The current spate of violence will exceed these totals as it continues to spread into other districts. Our estimate from Ground Zero is close to two dozen people dead -- one a Hindu girl burnt to death working for a Christian orphanage -- a nun has been gang-raped, religious men and women personnel humiliated, beaten, tortured, some close to death, while policemen have looked on or have been absent. We appeal for the restoration of law and order. But the root cause must also be addressed."
A growing chorus of leaders are speaking out against the violence, including: "Last week Pope Benedict XVI 'firmly condemned' the violence in Orissa and called on Indians 'to work together to restore peaceful co-existence and harmony between the different religious communities'" (Source: Sydney Morning Herald). "Indian Muslim Council-USA (IMC-USA), an advocacy group based in the U.S., denounced 'in the strongest terms,' the violence and the killing of VHP leader that preceded this violence" (Source: Indian Muslims). "The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom calls on the U.S. Department of State to urge the Indian government to take immediate steps to quell the violence against religious communities in the state of Orissa" (Source: USCIRF). There are many more statements we could post, voices of concern from Christianity Today, the Italian government, Christian organizations within India, and more.
Conspicuously missing from these statements is the voice of the Indian government itself. Its deafening silence is a loud indicator of India's lack of commitment to protect her minorities, uphold justice, and to protect peace.
When a despotic government pursues or tacitly supports violence against a minority population, the world community often complains loudly and often dedicates significant resources to restore security and promote justice. India, however, is the world's largest democracy and America's largest trading partner. India is often pointed to as an example of a successful post-colonial democracy, a nation where the advancement of democracy and the pursuit of freedom resulted in a strong, multireligious nation.
How do we then explain the terrible violence being waged against Christians this week or the immolation of Muslims in the state of Gujarat in 2002?
The bitter reality is that India is a nation that, while remaining dedicated to the basic principle of democracy, so often fails to adequately protect the rights of minorities. Christians, Muslims, Dalits, Scheduled Tribes, and other minority groups in India are too often vulnerable and persecuted, while their plight serves as an electoral "issue" and hot topic for debates and public speeches to gain new voting blocs.
Too often the United States' concern over religious freedom and human rights gets trumped by economic and trade interests. Our ability to apply real pressure on the government of India becomes muted to a whisper by these overriding foreign policy priorities. I pray that you will join us in lifting up prayers for the people of Orissa. These prayers can then be followed by tangible support to the ongoing relief effort and by advocacy to hold the Indian and U.S. governments more accountable to their professed ideal of protecting freedom, including the fragile freedom of the Christian and other minorities in India.
Benjamin Marsh is the state department liaison for the






Add to Newsvine




Comments
Thanks, guys, for bringing this urgent matter to the attention of this website. Regrettably, as I think you know, most people here are too busy fighting the inter-Christian battle between Obama and Palin to divert much energy to weightier matters.
Posted by: canucklehead | September 8, 2008 6:32 PM
Benjamin and Adam,
I had not heard about this. Thank you.
Posted by: carl copas | September 8, 2008 7:50 PM
As Christians we are going to have to choose more and more as the coming of Jesus draws ever closer.Jesus said they hated Him so what makes us think they are going to love us?
Posted by: cheryl gravitt | September 9, 2008 10:16 AM
Jesus said this would happen and that the world hated Him and so we could expect it to hate us.Why do we as Christians expect any different?It will only get worse as this age comes to a close.
Posted by: cheryl gravitt | September 9, 2008 10:21 AM
There's no reason for violence or any kind of hostility to be directed against religious minorities in a pluralistic democracy: be it India or the United States. When we take time to study the world's great religions, we may find more similarities than differences.
Dr. A.L. Basham, author of The Wonder That was India, observed:
"The bhakti tradition is very close to Christianity—Christianity of the devotional type—in its psychological attitudes. It comes particularly close to some aspects of mystic Catholicism. If you read the poems of mystics such as St. John of the Cross and St. Teresa, you find attitudes rather close to those of the bhakti poets of medieval India.
"I would say, for this reason, among others, that one shouldn’t look on Krishna Consciousness as a rival of Christianity...there’s really no need for the Christians to look on you as their rivals...They ought to recognize you for what you are: a movement with doctrines and ideas very close to their own, with much the same aims and rather an ally than a foe."
Posted by: Vasu Murti | September 11, 2008 1:34 PM
Secularism protects religious minorities: be it Christians in India, or Hindus in the United States. A secular society is religiously neutral, and does not favor one religion over another. Reverend Dr. C. Welton Gaddy of the Interfaith Alliance writes:
As Americans, you and I know many things about our country. That we live in a nation committed to religious freedom. That a democratic campaign for the presidency - an office with no religious test - demands that its candidates set aside their personal beliefs to do what is right for the nation. And, we know that houses of worship are no place for advancing a partisan political agenda. Unfortunately, candidates from both parties have failed to live up to these ideals during this election cycle.
You and I understand these ideals, but there are candidates for office who don't quite get it, and the difference between their rhetoric and the statements of the candidates who do understand is striking.
Some of the outrageously theocratic statements Gov. Palin has made, from asserting that our soldiers have been sent to - and died in - Iraq "on a task that is from God," to claiming it's God's will to build a natural gas pipeline across Alaska.
Contrast those statements with Sen. Joe Biden's interview on Meet the Press this weekend:
"There are an awful lot of people of great confessional faiths - Protestants, Jews, Muslims and others - who have a different view. They believe in God as strongly as I do. They're intensely as religious as I am religious. They believe in their faith…I voted against telling everyone else in the country that they have to accept my religiously-based view."
This sentiment is exactly what Interfaith Alliance is working diligently to encourage candidates to speak out in favor of across the country.
This comparison between Palin and Biden is not a partisan issue, as some may think. It's an issue of the preservation of one of our most basic rights: religious freedom. Both parties can get it right - and have, for which I have commended them. Both parties can get it wrong - and have, for which I have criticized them. As I look at the comments made on the campaign trail, it is clear to me that when it comes to protecting both faith and freedom, Palin doesn't get it.
As a nation, we are committed to religious freedom - by our Constitution, by the ideals of our founders and by the extraordinary diversity of the American people. We must press our candidates to recognize this principle before they take office. Interfaith Alliance needs help to fight back against candidates who don't get it, and to prevent a Pastor-in-Chief from taking over the office of our Commander-in-Chief.
Posted by: Vasu Murti | September 11, 2008 3:29 PM
Post a Comment
Are you aware of our Rules of Conduct?