September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006

Subscribe
RSS Feed
On Beliefnet
Blog Heaven
Quizzes
Prayer of the Day
Inspiration
Meditations
Prayer Circles
Memorials
News & Society
Home
 
 
 

Called or Drawn to 'The Abandoned Places of Empire'? (by Sharaya Tindal)

[see all posts in this conversation on New Monastics and race.]

The very first mark of the New Monastic movement is to relocate to the abandoned places of the empire.  However, after quick research, most of the social justice-geared intentional communities I found were either directly inside or in very close proximity to major cities. While there are enclaves within major metropolises that have seen the scourge of the empire, most of the American landscape is drenched in suburban and rural locales set far and away from the residual financial welfare the empire produces. And if that is the case, then the rationale for the privileged suburban dweller to relocate to urban hubs needs reexamination. 

I believe there is a contingent of people that the Most High will call to relocate from suburban and rural places to preach, teach, and serve neighborhoods in urban areas. I would like to believe that these people are willing to fulfill the call of the Lord, counting the cost of their decision -- perhaps reluctantly but with open minds and open hearts. These individuals are to be revered for their desire to be about God's business.

Conversely, there is a growing population that relocates to the so-called "abandoned places of the empire" because of the proximity to all of the amenities and economic promise the empire seems to trickle down. The draw of experiencing the "big city" cannot be ignored, no matter what the overarching humanitarian desire might be.

Indeed, there is quite a difference between the called and the drawn. When we as followers of Christ truly submit to the calling of God to preach good news to the poor, our first inclination should be to find the poor already in our midst, and deliver the message to them -- allowing them the opportunity to take that message home to their families and other neighbors, ensuring salvation for themselves and their households. The statistics are very clear: There are 1 million more impoverished Americans in the suburbs than in urban centers. Rural poverty among single mothers is at astronomical levels. Food stability is most scarce in rural areas. The further a community is from metropolitan areas, the more difficult it becomes to secure steady income, adequate wages, and affordable housing.  In fact, the majority of affordable housing is created in urban areas. Moreover, the infrastructure of social services is more readily available to urban dwellers. However, in suburban and rural areas, social services and affordable housing are somewhat of an afterthought. Looking at the composite of my own community, statistically many of us might actually reach more poor people if we lived in our hometowns than in our assembled New York City home.

The fact remains, the poor are all around us. If we are diligent in our search for the poor to preach to, to teach and serve, we need only look to our neighbors. We should realize that urban areas are not synonymous with poverty, nor are suburbs synonymous with privilege. When we get honest before the Lord with our preconceived notions about the people we believe are the poor and the least of these, we may find that the least of these are our next-door neighbors -- and not the urban ethnic enclave dwellers we so readily flock to.

We must be transparent with God and honest with ourselves when considering service to the poor. Being drawn to an area doesn't justify relocating to it. And being called to a place doesn't make you drawn to it. Throughout history, many people have been called to service, but were reluctant to go. Their reticence did not stop them from accomplishing revolutionary things for the kingdom of God. We must be diligent in seeking out the will of the Lord, and not be persuaded by the people, places, and things we are drawn to. If we are not diligent, we will lose our credibility and risk alienating, offending, and further marginalizing the very people we sent ourselves to enlighten and enfold in God's flock. We must make every effort to be led by the Spirit in all that we say and do to ensure our households experience the power of God through salvation in Christ.

Sharaya Tindal is a member of Radical Living, an intentional community in the Bedford-Stuyvesant neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York. Learn more about their community in this article in the New York Press.

[see all posts in this conversation on New Monastics and race.]

 

Comments

Thanks so much for this. 'The poor' is such an interesting term.

30 years ago when I was in the Chicago area, the projects in Chicago were horrific, but Gary, IN was worse. Chicago tended to get more programs, but no one wanted to go to Gary.

The face of our nation is changing. And with the economy changing like it is, the poor can be very close at hand.

Good article. Even in mostly affluent communities thare are many poor and/or marginlized people. Poverty is not just economic. Every community has foster children, foster families, families struggling with substance abuse, mental health or similar, isolated elderly with no close relatives or able friends, lonely persons with diaabilities, children in single families who need a mentor, alienated youth, and much, much more. In my experience rurual areas have less organized programs, and more social isolation that cities.

Wherever you live there is no limit to what committed Christians and others can do.

I was one of those who moved from the cul de sac to the historic district of my city. Even though I live in a small Southern city, the arts and the eclectic are here, and that was attractive. The history and a great 100+ year old house that was affordable drew me here.

However, since moving here, I have become acutely aware of the poor and the homeless. They walk up and down my street. They knock on my door and ask for help. I'm sure in the old neighborhood, someone would have called the police before they ever got as far as my door.

My point is this. The great commission in Matthew 28 could really be stated, as you are going, make disciples, baptize them, and teach them. Wherever you find yourself, look and you will see people who need your special abilities. If one does not experience a direct calling to a place or a work, perhaps being drawn to a place is the voice of the Lord in the gentle wind.

Urban areas attract such attention because the needs are most obvious in that setting. Many of the most active churches involved in outreach, along with the New Monastics, and the most experienced, are in those urban settings. Poverty, especially suburban poverty, is largely hidden away and much more easily overlooked. One might hope that our more experienced brothers and sisters in urban settings might be drawn to the suburbs and rural areas to provide outreach to the poor in those locations. Their experience would be most welcome. The article is correct, there is much to do wherever we are.

Peace

intersting piece you have really made me think today about the many different faces of poverty. I appreciate your words and outlook

Thank you for pointing out that we may be "called" or we may be "drawn" to a particular locale to be salt and light. Perhaps there is a third state of being in this world as we seek to know and follow God's will: being "located." There are times when we are in a place, "located" for a time, knowing that God is preparing us to be someplace else. For me, the temptation in those times, is to look for what is next, and neglect to be salt and light where I am.

This is very interesting. I think it is a good observation you make about poverty and how we are all impoverished and hungry in some form. I do also believe that often times people are drawn to the more "sexy" topics for perhaps prideful reasons.

However, although it is statistically true what you say about urban vs rural poverty, I fear that it may be used as an excuse to stay where we are comfortable--to avoid sacrifice--as I have often seen this to be the case. Of course, everybody is hungry, but it is my hope that we do not use one issue to avoid the inconviences of another, just as I would also hope we would not allow glamour to be the backbone of our service.

But I am in agreement with this: there is some form of need everywhere.

Post a Comment

Are you aware of our Rules of Conduct?







 

 
Recent Posts
God's Politics Has Moved!
Just the Facts (by Jim Wallis)
A Colombian Peacemaker's 'Option for Civil Resistance' (by Janna Hunter-Bowman)
Beyond Just War Theory (by Valerie Elverton Dixon)
Verse of the Day: 'Stand at the crossroads'
Daily News Digest (by Duane Shank)
Voice of the Day: Lawrence Kushner
Ohio After Ike: On the Ground, In the Dark (by Virginia Lohmann Bauman)
Ten Reasons Why This Election Should Be About Issues and Not Personalities (by Jim Wallis)
Catholic Bishops Denounce Immigration Raids as Anti-Family (by Jennifer Svetlik)
 
 
 

 
Explore Beliefnet
News & Society
Today's Headlines
Complete Politics Coverage

More Faith & Politics
Interview with Jim Wallis
Conservative Blogger Rod Dreher
Responding to a blog post? Read our Rules of Conduct first.