Filmmaker Alexandra Pelosi’s HBO documentary “Friends of God,” which premieres tonight, promises a behind-the-scenes look at the “broad tent” that is evangelicalism in this country, but instead, the film simply follows the same unimaginative formula of other documentaries, like “Jesus Camp.” The formula goes like this: After stating that you are going to provide a thoughtful and fair-minded look at the millions of Christians in the U.S., you show extensive footage of Ted Haggard and Jerry Falwell interwined with interviews with Southerners who have various Jesus slogans on their vehicles and t-shirts and who homeschool their children. For good measure, in case anyone misses your point, you make sure you edit your film footage to show these people in the most unattractive way possible.
Such a static treatment of Christians is frustrating, but it is not even remotely the most annoying part of this documentary. Even if I give Pelosi (daughter of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi) the benefit of the doubt and assume that more moderate, socially-conscious evangelicals like Jim Wallis, Rick Warren, or Rob Bell were wisely unavailable for comment, that doesn’t excuse Pelosi’s simplistic interviewing skills. “Friends of God” doesn’t give any insight into Christianity in our culture, but it sure does give us a good glimpse at Pelosi’s lack of professionalism as a journalist.
When she attends a church service in Texas, she approaches three young men in amazement, asking them what a group of “swingers” like them are doing in a church on a Saturday night. That’s the extent of the interview, but then she moves on to chatting with motivatinal speaker/pastor Joel Osteen. She asks Olsteen in mock astonishment how he could possibly fill a stadium with Christians. And that’s as far as that interview goes.
But then there is the most uncomfortable moment of the show, when she talks with Ted Haggard–who had not yet been enmeshed in his very-public sex scandal–about sex. He and a few of his parishoners tell her that evangelicals actually have better sex lives than other people–and she giggles, saying she had no idea she was with a such a group of “studs.” In between listening to all of these fascinating soundbytes, I tried counting how many times Pelosi says in sarcastic bemusement, “Wow, we don’t have that in New York” whenever she is talking to a Christian or looking at a Jesus slogan on a billboard, but I eventually lost track.
But just in case any Idol Chatter readers think I am responding to one bias with a bias of my own, the national trade paper Variety also criticizes the way Pelosi treats her subject matter, saying she displays “thinly veiled condescension” of Christians. The Variety article goes on to wisely suggest it is foolish to lump all evangelicals into one mold and to assume there is no common ground. Variety defending Christians against a New York liberal? Now that’s what I call progress.



posted January 26, 2007 at 9:09 pm
I haven’t seen the documentary, but I’ve seen a variety of reviews–some positive, some negative. What strikes me as dangerous is to assume that Haggard and Osteen and Falwell (or any small group of pastors) or a subset of southerners for example represent American evangelicals generally. What I don’t know is if the film really does that, or only studies a particular subset (which is all you can do in any particular film).
posted January 26, 2007 at 9:57 pm
Perhaps Ms Pelosi is merely trying to draw some attention to the more dangerous, the fundamentalist types within Christianity. After all, religion isn’t so much a danger to the world in the 21st century, it’s fundementalist religion, including Christian fundamentalist terrorism such as the killing of medical professionals, advocating the torture and killing of anyone who does not fit their narrow, perverted reading of scripture, etc.
posted January 27, 2007 at 11:13 am
I get cable but I have never subscribed to HBO and never plan to, because their offensive content far outweighs any other content they may have and it is most definitely not worth their subscription fee. It just seems to me they deliberately run controversial shows just to make people like us scream about it, thus bringing more publicity and calling attention to themselves. Think on this: what if they ran something controversial and no one gave so much as a peep about it? Their worst nightmare would be that they’re totally ignored.
posted January 29, 2007 at 5:48 pm
“After stating that you are going to provide a thoughtful and fair-minded look at the millions of Christians in the U.S., you show extensive footage of Ted Haggard and Jerry Falwell interwined with interviews with Southerners who have various Jesus slogans on their vehicles and t-shirts and who homeschool their children.” So? How is this un-thoughtful and unfair-minded? Many Christians in America follow(ed) Ted and jerry, They do have various Jesus slogans on their vehicles and t-shirts, and they do homeschool their children? Yer point?