I remember being equal parts curious and disturbed several years ago when my mother told me that she really enjoyed "The 40-year old Virgin." Disturbed, since one naively doesn't like to imagine one's mother enjoying such sexually explicit humor (much in the same way we don't like to think of our parents actually having sex) ,and curious since she really enjoyed Steve Carrell's portrayal of the lovelorn titular character hidden amongst writer/director Judd Apatow’s bawdy buddy repartee.Apatow’s latest, "Knocked Up," is more of the same, but this time he has created a chick flick wrapped in deliciously crass clothing. Think "She’s Having a Baby" meets "American Pie."
Up-and-coming E! News anchor woman Alison Scott (Grey's Anatomy’s Katherine Heigl) hooks up with pot-smoking slacker Ben Stone (writer Seth Rogen) only to find that their one-night stand results in more than sheepish grins in the morning. Alison decides to keep the baby and Ben says that he’s "on board."
But, even as Alison and Ben try to make their relationship work, Alison's sister's (Debbie troubled marriage seems to serve as a preview--and Ben keeps disappointing Alison (saving his bong during an earthquake instead of her). Needless to say, in the end, Ben rises to the occasion, getting a real job and his own place; things end up happily for the fledgling family.
The movie is at turns deeply touching, hysterically funny and doggedly realistic, especially the portrayal of Pete's (Paul Rudd) and Debbie's (Leslie Mann) marital problems--suspicions of infidelity, fears of not being able to be loved. As Pete says, "marriage is like 'Everybody Loves Raymond,' except that it's not funny."
Heck, even the fact that Heigl's Scott would hook up with a schlub like Rogen's Ben actually comes off realistic. But, I have to agree with Slate’s Dana Stevens that the least realistic aspect of the film is the fact that abortion was never really discussed as an option, but alluded to in silly ways, as in one scene where one character suggests something "that rhymes with sma-smortion."
"It's just not believable that, in Alison and Ben's upper-middle-class, secular L.A. milieu, abortion would not be matter-of-factly discussed as a possibility in the case of a pregnancy this accidental," writes Stevens. "If she doesn't want one, great--obviously, there'd be no movie if she did--but let's hear about why not. Otherwise, her character becomes a cipher, a foil for Ben's epiphanies about growing up, without being allowed any epiphanies of her own. The biggest unanswered question about Heigl's character is one the movie never tiptoes near--why does she decide to keep the baby?"
In an interview with The Onion’s A/V Club, Rogen notes that the choice wasn't in any way political: "We always knew that was not something we wanted to dwell on. It wasn't a movie about a woman deciding whether she should keep her baby; it was about a woman who decided she was going to keep the baby. ... But it just seemed like, you need her to make that decision to get to the other hour and a half of the movie, so let's just try to get there."
As much as I would like to think that Alison's decision to keep the baby is merely a device to motivate this charming story about two unlikely people finding each other, it seems too glib and naïve for a movie that illustrates so smartly and honestly life's most serious moments with such amusing aplomb.
Personal political leanings aside, "Knocked Up" is neither conservative, nor liberal, but another Apatow fairy tale--foul-mouthed and full of feeling. A mix that even a mother could love.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Having not seen the movie yet, I can't say for sure, but I would bet the abortion issue was brushed over so the movie could keep it's light feel. Why bring in something controversial when we know Alison is keeping the baby. I think it was a smart choice on the writer's part to not muddle up the movie on the why's and why not's of abortion. Whatever someone's stance in on this issue, isn't this a summer movie meant for fun?
Wow, so now abortion is a must have issue in any film about unexpected babies. The choice is a woman's to make; isn't that the way the saying goes? You say it is okay to choose to have a baby verses destroying the pregnancy. So the decision/choice is made to keep the baby, and you are not satisfied.
The "discussion" did not come up. You bias is that abortion should be a positive issue discussed at every opportunity available. That is a contrary view to your statements, aka hypocritical. Why state/quote that it is 'great' that they decide to keep the baby and then have a problem that there is no abortion discussion? Did they not exercise their freedom? Of course they did. Were they forced to have the baby versus aborting it? No, the movie would have indicated so. The truth is you want frequent discussion of and frequent action toward abortion. You don't want freedom and you don't think it is 'great' when people choose what they want.
So you didn't like their choice. Have we not the freedom to choose? Do we need to discuss the freedom all the time when you don't like its outcome? Does everything need to be run through Your filter to get approval? YOU need to be satisfied with their decision to keep the baby? Who made you judge in their lives to say this is a good or bad decision? You're upset because you couldn't be involved in someone's decision about abortion. Poor thing. You got your way politically on the abortion issue, but that is not enough. People need to choose the way you think is best. That is not freedom; that is tyranny, communism, socialism.
Just saw it, and it was actually really funny, which I didn't expect from another one of those movies with that kind of a poster and title. I have to say that, like many people, I felt that it stood out in the plot that a character meant to be 23 and an up-and-coming L.A. television personality would decide to continue her pregnancy. The plot doesn't say why, but that ends up being more interesting. I don't think the plot is very realistic, but I value that it made me think about it. I then suspected that it had been secretly financed by anti-abortion groups who wanted to send a pro-life (or fewer-abortions) message to the demographic who are socially liberal and would be entertained and attracted by the movie's funny stoner subplot. That's what got me to this website and others. There was an interview with the director, who said he is pro-choice, and I'll assume he's being honest. It stood out that on the first ultrasound, the doctor points to a flashing blip and describes as a heartbeat (not, "that's the heart beginning to form") which implies that the fetus is already a living being, so that's noted. In contrast, for the birth scene the director wanted to use a live baby and show the full birth, but that was not permitted by California law on the grounds that the baby would need a work permit and could not be granted one until after its birth.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.