Was Daniel Radcliffe doing some heavy marketing or a sublime giveaway of the next book’s ending in his recent interview for Entertainment Weekly?
After answering some nice questions from Steve Daly about his personal and physical growth, his fame, and comparisons to "Beverly Hills: 90210," the conversation turned to a comparison (initiated by Radcliffe) between Harry Potter and Jesus Christ.
When Daly asked him about the images that different audiences in different cultures have of Harry Potter, Radcliffe opined, "It's interesting. Harry Potter's like Jesus in that way."
He got shy about it for a bit, and then explained "My point is that Jesus is different in different countries. Like when Christianity was trying to be spread in Africa, all the depictions of Jesus were as a black man. In England, he's a white man, and that's how everyone views him. Of course, he wasn't. He was from the Middle East, he was from Israel, y'know, and would've looked Israeli. And so, it adjusts. The same does happen, I think the world over, for Harry Potter. He does change his appearance from country to country. Obviously he's always going to have the black hair, the scar, the glasses. But each country makes that its own."
Harry Potter, a Jesus figure? Interesting. Daly egged him on:
"Well, you're such a modest fellow, you immediately blanched at having compared Harry Potter to Jesus," Daly said. "But the comparison is apt. Harry is treated like a messianic figure in the books, and part of what the narrative's about is Harry coping with the exalted way other people see him."
Radcliffe replied, "To me, the books are mainly about a loss of innocence. He is on a mission in some way, and he is striving to do good. But he feels his goodness being taken away from him, as he becomes more like Voldemort."
I don’t get the connection. Not to sound like a bible geek, but Jesus never lost his innocence, never became more like Satan, and was never confused about his mission. Harry may be heroic, sacrificial, caring, and even moral within the confines of the story, but not messianic. Whether Radcliffe had a Freudian slip or was trying to hint in code to his fans, I think we’ll look back and realize that this was the first time we could know that Harry likely dies in the last book. You can read the whole thing here and decide for yourself.
Postscript: I suppose one door this may open is the chance for another book! After all, if the Jesus-figure dies, He’s going to have to rise again!
Add to Del.icio.us
Add to Technorati
Add to Digg
Add to Newsvine
Add to Facebook
Add to StumbleUpon
Subscribe
I believe we all pray to be more like Jesus, isn't that what we want? To be more Christ like. Radcliff never claims to be Jesus, it is the good fighting evil. Maybe he meant he carried the burden of many. He felt "only he" could make things right. Certainly like Jesus. Jesus knew his destiny, a fictional character like Harry Potter did not. I was glad evil was defeated in the end. I certainly wish that Dumbledore's sexual preferance was not disclosed- it is a children's book. The story was nothing like Jesus' however, we all should try to be like him. In other words, "what would Jesus do?" I hope you ask yourself that when you "judge" people on the books they read, the clothes they wear, etc. We are all children of God.
are you going to 18 this year and is harry potter and the deathly hallows your last film
hi
delicius daniel radcliffe
So everybody bow down to harry potter. Jk Rowling must be a prophet
He is a jesus figure because he openly faces death to save his friends and the innocents in the wizarding world. Then he dies and comes back.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.