By David Wolpe
There are three problems with Bill Maher's new movie mocking faith: It misunderstands religion, misconceives God and gets human nature all wrong.
I have a fantasy of a counter-movie. I would travel around the world and interview every scientist with a crackpot theory or a quack cure. I'd find researchers who were venal, eccentric, foolish or cruel, throwing in a few responsible scientists for credibility. Call it, say, "Scientifictious."
Of course, that would be no more convincing than "Religulous." Religion is not univocal; there are lots of varieties and personalities. There is no shortage of strange beliefs and practices. There is ample opportunity for derision. Think of the movie he could have made about people's eating habits.
What Maher seems not to know, or to understand, is that religion is not a fantasy flung upward but an intuition of something far greater than ourselves. Everyone who lives with open eyes has reason to question. In the search there will be missteps, even cruelties and division, but also sublimity, kindness, beauty, wonder and faith.
Perhaps Maher's greatest misunderstanding of religion is his central indictment: that religion is responsible for the world's violence. It is not. Violence is a product of human nature. Before monotheism, the Assyrians were not kind; the Romans were bloodthirsty beyond the imagination of religious regimes. When religion became less potent in people's lives after the French Revolution, instead of making the world less violent, it became far more violent: World War I and WWII, communism, Nazism -- all shed blood on an unprecedented scale. None were religious regimes or religious wars.
Maher's dislike of religion is not reasoned, however, but visceral. He told Mother Jones magazine about the Jews praying on his plane to Israel: "Even on the plane over, they were, at a certain point, they all stood up in the aisle of the plane davening [praying] ... they just looked like crazy people, always bowing their head. It's disconcerting." No doubt had they worn Armani suits and been tapping at a keyboard, Mr. Maher would have found them rational; but seeking transcendence in coach -- crazy.
If faith is, in part, the summit of our hopes, a guide and an aspiration, then what does Maher's creed leave him with? Again, as he tells Mother Jones: "I'm telling you. I've got nothing." It should not be hard to understand why someone might choose ancient wisdom over modern nihilism. It is not heroic to believe we are accidents of chemistry.
Maher's view of human nature as essentially animalistic (he repeatedly wonders why anyone would curb their sexual appetites) is dispiriting and plain wrong. Animals we are, but we are much more than animals.
Maher misunderstands God as a projection of human need. This is a common atheistic trope -- your belief is based on psychological deficiencies, while mine is reasoned. In truth, the existence of God is not an antidote to fear but a consequence of wonder. God does not come about through faulty reasoning but through a worshipful and humble orientation of the soul.
"Religulous" repeatedly calls faith irrational. True, it is not a product of pure reason, but then what is, apart from mathematics? Reason does not get us out of bed, or move us to love or kindness. Religion is supported by reason, however. The marvel of values, ideas and consciousness -- nonphysical but powerful phenomena -- can reasonably be thought to have an origin in a nonphysical entity: that is, God. Centuries of people emboldened by, and ennobled by, faith can reasonably be thought to have something more than foolish illusions in their minds and hearts. Nevertheless, Maher calls religion a "neurological disorder."
In study after study, religion proves to make people not just happier but more likely to give to charity and have stable marriages, to reduce drug and alcohol dependence and improve mental health. That does not make it true, but it is worthy of thought: Why should something so "irrational," a mere "neurological disorder," be so helpful to society?
Many of us suspect -- or yes, believe -- that there is more to the world than we know, that there is a mystery at its heart. That mystery may evoke some unworthy speculation, attract some charlatans, occasion some cruelties. Faith is also the spur for everything from the poetry of Psalms to the Cathedral at Chartres to relief missions. "Religulous" is one-dimensional. Religion is as varied and colorful as God's blessed world.
David Wolpe is the rabbi of Sinai Temple in Los Angeles and the author of "Why Faith Matters." This article first appeared in the LA Times.

Add to Newsvine
I THINK THAT MAHER ACTUALLY {SOMEWHERE DEEP DOWN} WANTS TO BELIEVE IN GOD,OTHERWISE WHY ELSE WOULD HE BE SO OBSESSED WITH RELIGION .IT'S AS THOUGH HE WERE ON A SEARCH.HE ALSO STATES THAT HE IS AN AGNOSTIC,NOT AN ATHEIST.THAT LEAVES THE DOOR OPEN FOR FAITH. DON'T HATE HIM,PRAY FOR HIM!
Every 'mature' Christian by the guidence of the Holy Spirit has been given the revelation of the differances between those who ponder God's existance and those who challenge and/or rebel against His existance and/or Authority. One is ignorant and/or spiritually blind and decieved and the other is foolish and/or of a evil heart. Thier is hope for those who seek after answers but for those who with a clear mind and can see the glory of God in this profound universe and claim thier is no God is a fool. God's mercy allows us to contemplate with questions such as 'God, are you thier?' or 'If you really are God, show me' but to proclaim that God dose not exist or to say that God is only a figment of our imagination and can not exist is simply foolish. God does want worship but religon is man made and in our attempt to seek God, if we are sincere in heart, we will know the Truth regardless of the imperfections of religous institutions. It requires more faith to trust science as a explination for all things rather than a intelligent and loving God. The scriptures are quite clear on this. The Word of God says that even us 'saved folk' were at one time foolish but saved by grace(Titus 3:3-5). Jesus Christ wept as He rode into Jeruselem (John 11:35) showing pity for those who were about to crucify the only One who could save them but they could not 'see' it after seeing him do incredable miracles. So it's no great mystery that some people can witness all God's glory and still believe we evolved from monkeys and/or that life is all one accident that can be explained with our puny minds. God's commentary on fools is so important He repeats the message in Psalm chapter 14 and chapter 53. Bill seems to follow the character of Proverbs 18:2 but we must keep in mind Ecclesiates 5:1-7 and Romans 1:18-32. We have a lot of work to do and God never said it would be easy.
Yeah. But you have to admit, he has a point.
He does have a point. This article seems to imply that without God we have no reason to get up in the morning. I'm very happy in my secular life.
The article even admits that religion is not a product of real reason. How can you be so sure that you don't just believe it because it has "always been there?"
Also, your are completely missing the point. You quote scripture left and right, but in truth the Bible was written by MEN in a time where there was no logical explanation for many of earth's events, so people had to make assumptions. That's how the Greeks got Poseidon--to explain sea storms. Think about. Scientific research didn't really exist.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.