When it was announced, Disney seemed to be motivated by pure economics. The second film in the series, "Prince Caspian," had cleared only $219 million over its production budget, compared to the more than $500 million worth of black ink that flowed from the series opener, "The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe." And Disney, be reminded, had to split even those profits.
But in the two weeks since the Disney-Walden split, there's been some grumbling about an anti-Christian conspiracy. Christian sources have complained bubbled up about Disney's failure to market the film to Christians properly. According to elements at the C.S. Lewis Society of California, Disney blew it by not mounting a "Passion of the Christ"-style campaign for the hearts and minds of Christians, complete with screenings for pastors and Bible-based study guides.
But church-based marketing campaigns have not worked as well as they've been hyped and Hollywood execs have largely lost faith in them. And further accusations about Disney's watering down the Christian elements don't hold up either. "Caspian" contained more overt theological discussion than "Lion, Witch and the Wardrobe."
That's not to say Disney is blameless. Even secular industry watchers have faulted Disney for its sword-flashing posters and eardrum crushing trailers that presented "Caspian" as an action flick, not a family-friendly adventure. Others wondered why Disney released "Caspian" last Spring, instead of holding it for Christmas '08.
It's worth considering whether Disney was looking for a way out even before "Caspian"'s feeble box-office or the economic downturn. After the popular "Lion, Witch and the Wardrobe," the magical innocence of Narnia gets increasingly dark and, not for nothing, increasingly less PC. But with credit short and the economy showing few signs of perking up, it's more than likely that Disney concluded that the gaudily produced Narnia films were too rich for their blood. It's easy to think that Disney got too old for Narnia, but in fact it looks like Narnia simply got a little old for Disney.
Add to Del.icio.us
Add to Technorati
Add to Digg
Add to Newsvine
Add to Facebook
Add to StumbleUpon
Subscribe
Thank you for your balanced approach to this. I, too, though the comments by The C S Lewis Society were a bit overboard. Like you say, Disney is not faultless, but much of what I am hearing is sour grapes. There is also an element that was never pleased with the films--they were not "Christian" enough for their taste--and this element is on the "I told you so" spiel. As if their arguments suddenly became more rational because of Disney's decision.
Even the book "Prince Caspian" is not as good as "The L, W, & W". Disney may have missed the boat - pun intended - by passing on "Dawn Treader", one of the stronger stories, and certainly one of the most visual of the books. I cannot imagine the need to market specifically to Christian groups - they (we) all know the books and have been waiting not-too-patiently for them to be filmed. I do wonder who will pick up "D.T." Perhaps Universal will see it as a legitimate pairing with Harry Potter.
Worth noting too , is that the $219 million wasn't "split" between Disney and Walden. It was split between the theaters and the studio.
Half of a movie's gross goes to the theaters on average.
I hope VoDT gets made, however, I'm not holding out too much hope. That's okay, though. The books remain, and I always find more value in books than movies.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.