Hostage to Nobody: Derek Webb's 'Stockholm Syndrome'
A few minutes of footage from the making of Derek Webb's new, stunningly successful album, "Stockholm Syndrome" explains a lot about what Webb, the consciously controversial Christian singer-songwriter, is up to with his latest release. In the docu-video released last...
Paul, this is a very well written commentary about Derek's new project! Kudos!
Joanne Brokaw
As much as I've enjoyed the music of both Derek Webb and Caedmon's Call, the whole "controversy" controversy that has followed Webb since his departure from Caedmon's is stale. Yes, I think Derek is saying good things that do need to be heard by the church, but it's become quite muddied by the reactions that I don't see anyone actually making, but feel as though I'm reading about everytime I look at anything involving Webb. Maybe it is the doing of the Christian sub-culture that Webb has spoken about, or maybe it his intention to get a reaction, either way, it's taking away from the message of a good song writter who has something to say.
I like the record and find his lyrics thoughtful and welcome in a sea of Christian music. Some say there is offense in his language, his" point" and his communication style--and I could agree. I don't agree with everything he says and I don't find his expressions worthy to" build a house" on. However, equally offensive is the vast collection of Christian music that makes the "point" so blatantly obvious that my heart and mind are unaffected. Listen, learn and repeat; like Top 40, but "safer." IMO, the church needs more radical, thought provoking dialogue through artistic medium--not to create unified agreement, but to catalyze thought and progress the ability for the Church to introduce the world the person of Jesus--the true foundation.
I am a Christian and I hate Christian music. I don't like categorizing any music into "Christian" because it's just music. Webb is an amazing artist, point blank. His lyrics are challenging and well placed. Good job on the album! If the "Christian" music market is upset, well done.
I think it is so great that as a Christian Sub-Culture bi-product you think that smoking is the root of all evil but you probably wrote this article at some Christian owned coffee shop called "He-Brews." While sipping on the Christian safe stimulant of Coffee. As for purposely offending. I'm sure your article was written with pure intentions of not rippling the water.
It must suck to be so intimidated by someone who can be so creative with so many different medias. If you really care or "Give a Shit" why don't you criticize the artist who will sell all the regurgitated crap and sell wwjd glowsticks lighters, and bracelets leading the youth of this nation to thinking that God really wants their "Best Life Now".
First off, I dig the music itself.
However, if it wasn't for all of the press and shenanigans telling me how "controversial" it is, I wouldn't have thought it was stirring up anything at all. I have yet to actually hear somebody speak a foul word about the content or lyrics; all I have are reports by the press, such as this, that there are people out there complaining somewhere. I don't live in the Bible Belt, so maybe that's part of it, but the press all feels a bit too much like manufactured marketing to me.
So the big news is that a musician put out a song that's supposed to shock people? Last time I checked, we've been doing that since Stravinsky's Rite of Spring; that sort of comes with the job.
Let the music be what it is. If the music and lyrics twist people up inside just like you intended, then you've done your job. If you have to tell people that something's controversial, it's probably not.
Here's a video of the controversial song from Stockholm Syndrome.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KC0j6FTg1xU
What makes you say the album is "stunningly successful"? Do you have online sales numbers?
"it sure seems like being straight is what this is all about."
Correction -
"it sure looks to me like being straight is all it's about"
I want to respond to a couple of comments about my above review of Derek Webb's new album "Stockholm Syndrome."
To Tim Eagerton, who writes that the media are creating controversy where there is none, I'd say that it's possible that the label omitted one of his songs from the album in order to drive up sales, and the media (I guess that's me) took the bait. But when an artist with Webb's track record has to release a song himself rather than see it die in the dark, that's what's defined as controversy on my beat, and I'd be remiss to ignore it.
In answer to Ron's question about what makes the album "stunningly successful": that's a critical judgment on my part. When I heard that Webb was making a techno album, I was flabbergasted by the change in his sound, but he pulls it off.
Lastly, Eric Howell entirely misses his guess about my habits, of mind, spirit and stimulants.
Would the album really be "controversial" to the people buying it? Who would knowingly buy the censored version? Most likely if a person had a problem with those two little words, they would not buy the rest of the songs, which would be at least as offensive to their world view if they listened to the lyrics. So with whom is the controversy?
My guess is that this is no publicity stunt. INO is a division of the Integrity/Hosanna label (See the about tab at http://www.integritymusic.com/), which puts out worship music. I'm sure they had an honest problem with putting it out, and I'm sure DW had an honest problem with being censored. I bet the label people would be amused to see their decision labeled as a "stunt."
The next question would be, how much longer will Mr. Webb be with his label? Does he have to fulfill a contract?
Derek's new CD brings the wrong message at the wrong time. The church is getting too much pressure from outside forces to keep quiet about homosexuality. We don't need more of that pressure from within our own ranks. The CD is being portrayed as anti-establishment. It really isn't. It is so much easier to take a stand for keeping quiet, than it is to actually say anything that anyone could ever construe as anti-homosexual. Derek is so politically correct. And the problems don't end with that one song. The CD enters into territory that should have been off limits.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.