Even though I last sat with Maharishi more than ten years ago, he left an indelible impression, as he did on everyone. His extraordinary qualities are known to the world. Without him, it's fair to say, the West would not have learned to meditate.
During the Cold War era a reporter once challenged him by saying, "If anything is possible, as you claim, can you go to the Soviet Union tomorrow with your message?" Without hesitation, Maharishi calmly replied, "I could if I wanted to." Eventually he did want to, and meditation arrived in Moscow several years before the Berlin Wall fell. In his belief that world peace depended entirely on rising consciousness, Maharishi was unshakable.
The Bhagavad-Gita declares that there are no outward signs of enlightenment. The point is underscored in many Indian fables and scriptures, which often take the form of a high-caste worthy snubbing an untouchable, only to find that the untouchable was actually a god in disguise. For his part, Maharishi had three guises, and perhaps in the end they were also disguises.
He was an Indian, a guru, and a personality. The personality was highly quixotic. Over the fifty yea r s of his public life, Maharishi never lost his charm and lovability. He had these qualities to such an extent that Westerners took him to be a perfect example of how enlightenment looks -- kind, sociable, all-accepting, and light-hearted -- when that is far from the case. His presence was more mysterious than good humor can account for: you could feel it before entering a room. You could be walking down the hallway to his private apartments with the weight of the world on your shoulders and feel your worries drop away with every step, until by the time your hand touched the doorknob, by some magic you felt completely carefree.
But if you were around him long enough, the older Maharishi in particular could be nettlesome and self-centered; he could get angry and dismissive. He was quick to assert his authority and yet could turn disarmingly child-like in the blink of an eye.
The Maharishi who was an Indian felt most comfortable around other Indians, with whom he chatted about familiar things in Hindi. He adhered to the vows of poverty and celibacy that belonged to his order of monks, despite the fact that he lived in luxury and amassed considerable wealth for the TM movement. What gets overlooked is that he viewed wealth as a means to raise the prestige of India in the materialistic West, which was both canny and realistic of him. In the end the movement's money went to preserve the spiritual heritage of India by opening pundit schools and building temples.
Maharishi was deeply concerned that he might be the last embodiment of a sacred tradition that was quickly being overwhelmed by modernization.
In one way or another, for good or ill, these two Maharishis are the only ones that the outside world knew. If you came under the power of his consciousness, however, Maharishi the guru completely overshadowed every other aspect. It's shameful to say, but gurus are a dime a dozen in India and are often treated like retainers by the rich and powerful. Nothing could be farther from the truth in Maharishi's case. He was venerated by the venerable and considered holy by the holy. His capacity to explain Vedanta was unrivaled, and if he accomplished nothing else in his long life, his commentary on the Bhagavad-Gita insures his lasting name, because with acute analysis he cuts through to the heart of every verse. Imagine that someone arose in the West who definitively settled all the disputes over the New Testament and went on to exemplify the nature of Jesus. Then you might get some idea of Maharishi's impact as a guru.
Around 1990 I was commissioned to write a book about him; it turned out to be the only assignment I could never complete. Even after spending hundreds of days in his presence, one could not capture him, either on paper or in one's mind. The Gita is right to say that there are no visible signs of enlightenment, but I would go further. The enlightened person ceases to be a person and attains a connection to pure consciousness that erases all boundaries. My deepest gratitude goes to Maharishi Mahesh Yogi for showing me that this state of unity exists outside folk tales, temples, organized religion, and scripture itself. To live and breathe in unity consciousness is unfathomable, but in at least one case, I am sure it is real.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Dear Deepak,
Thank you for writing such an honest and lovely tribute to Maharishi.
One experience I had with him at MIU(1975)was this one:
He and a few other people were walking out of the library where he had been making revisions to the tapes for his course. A few of us students in Phase One of Teacher Training were waiting for him at the door. He was happy and smiling and greeting everyone as he walked out.
We said Jai Guru Dev to him; he walked by saying in his wonderful voice "Jai Guru Dev" and we saw the words float from his mouth over his head to trail behind him as he walked further through the door.
It was a joyful and fun moment with him.
Dearest Deepak,
Your words are precious and comforting. To read your children's stories have lifted our hearts at this time. Maharishi's Light will no doubt be felt more powerfully now, from all levels of creation. I met him for the first time in 1975 at the LA Convention center. I was 17yrs at the time, and I KNEW I was in the presence of a Holy Man. I was forever deeply touched that day, when Maharishi turned to me after he had been handed numerous flowers. "Now go and share these with our friends" So I turned and handed out flowers one by one to others. VERY PRECIOUS MOMENT.
Dear Deepak,
Thank you for your tribute to Maharishi...I believe he enabled our new-age era which includes multiple forms of communications (e.g. internet or cellular phones and not only meditation).
I am a cellular biologist and was searching for some years now, for the "carrier" of factors like chi or prana in our body (as well as out)...I believe I can suggeest a radical gas than can do it - nitric oxide. I will greatly appreciate your comments on my scientific paper:
Studying Wellness from a Net Perspective, Dr. Dina Ralt,
Med Hypotheses. 2008;70(1):85-91
http://www.notes.co.il/dina/32099.asp
I will be happy to further discuss its implications.
Thank You
Dina
In 1971 I had the privilege, or should I say blessing, to be near Maharishi for 9 weeks at a teacher training course. Later, I had the opportunity to be near him for shorter periods of time. Being in his holy presence was indiscribable. The atmosphere radiated with silence and purity. You knew you were where you wanted to be and it didn't matter what else was going on anywhere. He was the embodiment of the ancient Vedic sages of India. He was the representation of human potential, and his gift of Transcendental Meditation is the simplest and most natural way to realize what is possible for mankind.
Just a short story, one night after a lecture at teacher training, I came down with some sort of food poisoning. I don't know what I ate but I was so sick that I couldn't walk. The next evening before the lecture, my friends suggested that I sit as close to Maharishi as possible as I was still very sick. We managed to sit near him but to his side. Before the lecture started I noticed he was scanning the audience. As his gaze came around to our side, he focused on me. Instead of seeing the usual sweet gaze and smile, he looked very serious. In his eyes there was a look of power that hit me so hard I yelled out, "wow, look at that!" My friend beside me saw it also. In an instant, all feelings of illness were gone and I felt filled with bliss and energy. Suddenly he broke into the most beautiful smile and shinned at both my friend and I. I knew that I had experienced a glimpse of his true spiritual power. It was worth every bit of being sick!
Though he has now left the physical, his silence, love and compassion is still very much with us. Just enjoy within.
Craig
In heading his blog "The Three Maharishi's" yet finishing with his deepest gratitude that Unity Consciousness is a state Maharishi exemplified, I have to say I'm confused.
Certainly, touching higher levels intermittently may just be possible, but I remember in the early days, Maharishi explaining that Unity Consciousness, the ultimate state after God Consciousness, would be impossible to LIVE in the world of material duality.
It seems that the stresses of organisational priorities,running a
"spiritual business" for instance would be a confusion of roles, (good as the Quaker ethos was in its early days).
I remember a lovely senior German lady doctor sadly seeing this dilemna in the TM's early mid 60's period on a course in Austria, and did what DC. did much later.
Ramana Maharshi seldom got "nettlesome", save when he found that he was getting preferential treatment over the beggers and saddhus in the quality of food being distributed. Although there dhamas' were very different, Maharishi Mahesh whilst patently in a very exhalted state when "overshadowed" by Guru Dev; nevertheless could surround himself with somewhat weak charactered people, so wonderfully described in Nancy Cooke Herrera's book "Beyond Gurus", while junking wise helpers like Jerry Jarvis. I wonder how Ma and other good people of the early period truly are now? It would be good for them to reveal their journeys one day in order to help others.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.