The specter of a defeated America remains the single most powerful motivator for national policy. As a country, victory is the only viable option. After two world wars in which America played the role of rescuer (the New World coming to end the bloody folly of the Old), it wasn’t until Richard Nixon portrayed America as “a pitiful, helpless giant” in the Vietnam era that the U.S. had to face the reality that wars are not always won. History is repeating itself almost verbatim today in Iraq. That conflict has been a disaster for five years, yet John McCain’s policy of “no surrender” could carry the day.
America, always proud of its youthful vigor, resists the prospect of maturity. It would be a mature decision to wind up the Iraq war as soon as possible, to oversee a just settlement with the help of the U.N., and to make reparations for the immense devastation we recklessly caused. Something like that is bound to happen, but the underlying fact is that Iraq, like Vietnam before it, was a naked exercise in national pride. The giant had to swagger across the world stage, bringing war where there was no cause. The image of military might was the only cause, while in the shadows the shame of possible defeat exercised its baleful influence. The shadow was doubly powerful because of 9/11, which brought a feeling of national helplessness. Iraq was the exorcism of that feeling as much as anything else.
As with any powerful image, this one can’t be countered with reason. That’s what baffles anti-war movements, then and now. They aren’t listened to on reasonable grounds but instead are vilified as traitors. By definition, it’s anti-American to even hint at defeat.
In the current presidential race, the accusation that Barack Obama isn’t a patriot (which is believed, the latest polls show, by almost 25% of the population) is an anti-war backlash. John Kerry tried to disguise that he was a longtime peacenik in 2004, only to be blasted by an anti-patriot smear in the form of Swift boating. Now Obama must figure out how to quell the specter of the pitiful, helpless giant, extricating us out of Iraq without suggesting defeat and failure. So far he’s relied on realism, flatly telling the public that the war has been a debacle. A large sector of the public already believes this and won’t demonize him, which leaves another sector, unknown in size, for whom the image of defeat isn’t subject to reason. Over the course of the next four months Obama will test whether they can be coaxed into reality or not.
www.intentblog.com
www.deepakchopra.com




posted July 19, 2008 at 11:27 am
First of all, I would like to comment about Deepak Chopra. I think he is an amazingly insightful, yet realistic man. I have always liked, in my years observing presidents, which one appeared spiritual and had a sense of morality. I have not seen many fit that bill, but I think Jimmy Carter comes close. The war waged upon Iraq is totally unfair-in the moral sense. Except that it has oil reserves that are now the U.S.A.’s resources. I sonetimes cannot believe what people will do for profit. I want Hillary Clinton in the whitehouse, but the profit- bearing H.M.O’S won’t allow universial health care. I am one of the system’s victims of H.M.O’s, and bad health care for the poor. I had been told by the doctors enrolled in those lousy plans my chest pains were “ALL IN MY HEAD”. I WAS TURNED AWAY BY MY DOCTOR WITH MY EVER-PRESENT CHEST PAINS. When I talked to the manager, the doctor agreed I should be put in the hospital. I was having a heart attack, and would have been sent away and probably died at home. When I FIRST SAW MY NEW CARDIOLOGIST WITH MY NEW HMO, he insisted it was my stomach. Then he yelled, I MEAN YELLED I SHOULD BE GLAD HE WAS SEEING ME WITH JUST AN HMO. Now, in the end of six years of a failing heart. God bless the poor, and suffering, all around the world. I wish I COULD FIND A SENSE OF PEACE. Thank you.