Jesus Creed

Jesus Creed

Jesus on Being Missional 5

posted by xscot mcknight | 8:17am Thursday September 1, 2005

Jesus told his missional Apostles not to take money, not to carry a beggar’s bag, and not even to take extra clothing and shoes — and then adds they are not to take a staff (probably a protective device).
There have been many interpretations of Jesus’ strong directions to the Apostles on what provisions on their missional journey. To begin with, the entire monastic tradition has taken them literally — and I think here of both St. Francis and St. Bonaventure. Another view sees Jesus distancing his followers from the Cynics, who did carry a “beggar’s bag.” So, it becomes a social statement and behavior that defines the group around Jesus.
The critical factor, so far as I read the text, is that Matthew 10:9-10a is explained in 10:10b (“for the the worker is worthy of his provisions”). In other words, missional work like this requires:
(1) trust in God,
(2) the protection of the Kingdom’s reputation by what it looks like, and
(3) assumption that God’s people will provide.
Missional work, then, is work done in dependence on God and for God’s glory and in the context of God’s good people. We might call these the foundation, the direction, and the condition of missional work: missional folk trust in God, they aim to please God in everything they do, and they inhabit the community.
There is a subtle issue that is as relevant now as it was then: money-grubbing is not part of God’s missional workers. Let me speak for the “workers” here: they deserve to be cared for and to provided for. They are, Jesus says, “worthy” of that.



Previous Posts

This blog is no longer active
This blog is no longer being actively updated. Please feel free to browse the archives or: Read our most popular inspiration blog See our most popular inspirational video Take our most popular quiz

posted 3:10:39pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Our Common Prayerbook 30 - 3
Psalm 30 thanks God (vv. 1-3, 11-12) and exhorts others to thank God (vv. 4-5). Both emerge from the concrete reality of David's own experience. Here is what that experience looks like:Step one: David was set on high and was flourishing at the hand of God's bounty (v. 7a).Step two: David became too

posted 12:15:30pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Theology After Darwin 1 (RJS)
One of the more important and more difficult pieces of the puzzle as we feel our way forward at the interface of science and faith is the theological implications of discoveries in modern science. A comment on my post Evolution in the Key of D: Deity or Deism noted: ...this reminds me of why I get a

posted 6:01:52am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Almost Christian 4
Who does well when it comes to passing on the faith to the youth? Studies show two groups do really well: conservative Protestants and Mormons; two groups that don't do well are mainline Protestants and Roman Catholics. Kenda Dean's new book is called Almost Christian: What the Faith of Ou

posted 12:01:53am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Let's Get Neanderthal!
The Cave Man Diet, or Paleo Diet, is getting attention. (Nothing is said about Culver's at all.) The big omission, I have to admit, is that those folks were hunters -- using spears or smacking some rabbit upside the conk or grabbing a fish or two with their hands ... but that's what makes this diet

posted 2:05:48pm Aug. 30, 2010 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(4)
post a comment
chris

posted September 1, 2005 at 9:01 am


In what ways is Jesus’ injunction like (Gotama) Buddha’s? Didn’t he tell his monks to do something similar? (Don’t know about the “beggar’s bag,” but I know they rely on alms for food, etc.)



report abuse
 

John

posted September 1, 2005 at 9:57 am


As I am a person involved in the “missions” industry this a section of scripture that has been of interest. While we would both agree that the “worker” is worthy of their provision it begs the question then of the community being willing to “send” out and to “provide” for the needs. Does that mean entire needs, partial needs? Or does it mean an extended community (catholic/universal)? In todays world it is not a simple thing to deal with, however I believe that it is something that deserves our attention.
I would however rather ask the question, what is it that we do when we go out? And I would say that we don’t follow the example of Jesus very closely as we have pitted the spreading of the good news with the doing of good deeds against each other.
I really apprecite your insight Scot.
John



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted September 1, 2005 at 5:46 pm


John,
I’ll be posting on your question.
The issue of supplying needs by home and reception churches is outside my interest in this blog: more on what Jesus did say. Pragmatics are determinative here.



report abuse
 

Jamie Arpin-Ricci

posted September 1, 2005 at 8:28 pm


Likewise, how this plays itself out today is of particular interest to me, being part of a “missions agency”. I look forward to what is to come.
Peace,
Jamie



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.