When I was at seminary, a very good one, by the way, I was trying to get at something like this- in inquiry. But I didn’t have the knowledge and understanding to come up with this. (I think that seminary is moving this direction as well, and already had some thoughts that way not yet implemented, when I was there)
If someone would have said this at the time (late 80′s, early 90′s), I would have said, “Right on.” I think this is moving in a great direction for seminary.

What do you mean by “Barna’s numbers”? I think I missed something somewhere. Thanks.

I was encouraged to see this happening last fall as I spoke to John Franke then about stuff. I am glad to see them moving full steam ahead.

What do you mean by “Missional Approach,” and “missional work now?” Forgive me if I’m out of the loop, but this is a nomenclature (“missional”) with which I am unfamiliar. Could you define it for us? Thanks.

There are about a hundred sources on this; I’ve blogged about it aplenty.
I suggest the following:
Maybe the best is the last chp of Daniel Bosch Transforming MIssion.
Alan Roxborough
Frost and Hirsch
McLaren’s Generous Orthodoxy

Essentially it is going to them, being the presence of Christ, rather than asking them to come to church. It is holistic in orientation, etc..

As a current seminarian, it is good to see that probably only three of your ten (1, 2, maybe 5) are completely dependent upon the seminary. It seems like the students can really take on all the others, whether the seminary is formally on board or not.
Number three is really important, and I think seminaries will take notice if students really get on board and live lives of mission in local ministries. Of course, I go to a smaller seminary, so I have the sense that I can afford this optimism, but from what I hear from friends at other (ahem) larger seminaries, they hold out hope of being noticed and taken seriously as well.
I guess the question is how long it takes for the adminstrative giants to turn in an official capacity.

Scot,
When I checked out the Biblical Seminary website my heart skipped a beat. It is the most innovative attempt to reformat seminary education I have ever seen. The emphasis is right. Now, the leaders must take the next step. Missional is essential, but not enough. It must be missional and also centered on the kingdom of God. I am glad you discussed the meaning of the gospel.

Scot,
Wow…This is exciting. I’m excited about the way they think. I appreciate your ten points. I hope many other seminaries will pay attention to what is happening there. This is encouraging.

Mr. Aston.org » A Missional Seminary – from Jesus Creed

[...] A Missional Seminary: [...]

I find your cliches funny. I doubt if the apostle Paul would know what you were talking about.
Intentionally missional.
Emerging vision.
Praxis approach.
Missional leader.
Missional theology.
Integrate the sacred rhythm of morning and afternoon and evening prayers.
Poor apostle Paul. Whatever became of using Biblical language?

Lorrie, I think that Biblical language is for poor failures like the apostle Paul. Sorry, but this is the 21st century where semi-tried, and half-true cliches rule the day!!!

I’ve only taken about 15 distance hours from biblical, but have found them to be very engaging and on the edge of what is happening. It is an education that engages the current context. Very good in my limited experience there.

I have trouble understanding what you are talking about