Jesus Creed

Jesus Creed

Atonement: The Problem 6

posted by xscot mcknight | 5:22am Thursday April 27, 2006

Here’s a thesis Mark Biddle, in his excellent new study on sin (Missing the Mark), defends in his last chapter: “Sin creates a real circumstance that lingers in the world until it comes to fruition — sometimes with the assistance of accusers and sometimes with God’s ‘permission’ or even encouragement — or until it is deactivated” (118). In other words, sin is an act, it is guilt and it entails consequences. It can take on a life of its own.
Unaddressed, sin matures into systemic evil, injustice, and violence.
Biddle shows how this notion illuminates how sins can be felt for three and four generations and how this notion helps us understand original sin. Furthermore, he moves in the direction of seeing the wrath of God as the organic outworking of God’s moral order rather than simply God’s invasion into the world in an act of punishment. Some today want to do away with wrath, but can only do so by erasing lots of verses in the Bible. What they want to erase, for the most part, is an unbiblical concept of wrath: which is not the external act of God but the internal workings of God’s world. What needs to be maintained, in my estimation, is that wrath is still the work of God. There is, in other words, no such thing as an “impersonal” wrath but instead no such thing as an “external” expression of God’s wrath. (Most of this paragraph is reflection that derives from stuff I read in Biddle’s book.)
Biddle thinks modernity’s individualism blocks it from seeing the systemic nature of sin and blocks it from taking responsibility for systemic evil; the biblical concept of sin is more organic and it describes sin as something alive and well and in need of being removed.
This chp has good discussions about the various terms around the notion of removing sin and he has a good study of David and Bathsheba and Manasseh, Jeremiah, and the Babylonians.
This is a good book and could be a steady textbook for seminarians in both biblical theology or systematics.



Previous Posts

This blog is no longer active
This blog is no longer being actively updated. Please feel free to browse the archives or: Read our most popular inspiration blog See our most popular inspirational video Take our most popular quiz

posted 3:10:39pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Our Common Prayerbook 30 - 3
Psalm 30 thanks God (vv. 1-3, 11-12) and exhorts others to thank God (vv. 4-5). Both emerge from the concrete reality of David's own experience. Here is what that experience looks like:Step one: David was set on high and was flourishing at the hand of God's bounty (v. 7a).Step two: David became too

posted 12:15:30pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Theology After Darwin 1 (RJS)
One of the more important and more difficult pieces of the puzzle as we feel our way forward at the interface of science and faith is the theological implications of discoveries in modern science. A comment on my post Evolution in the Key of D: Deity or Deism noted: ...this reminds me of why I get a

posted 6:01:52am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Almost Christian 4
Who does well when it comes to passing on the faith to the youth? Studies show two groups do really well: conservative Protestants and Mormons; two groups that don't do well are mainline Protestants and Roman Catholics. Kenda Dean's new book is called Almost Christian: What the Faith of Ou

posted 12:01:53am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Let's Get Neanderthal!
The Cave Man Diet, or Paleo Diet, is getting attention. (Nothing is said about Culver's at all.) The big omission, I have to admit, is that those folks were hunters -- using spears or smacking some rabbit upside the conk or grabbing a fish or two with their hands ... but that's what makes this diet

posted 2:05:48pm Aug. 30, 2010 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(8)
post a comment
Ted Gossard

posted April 27, 2006 at 6:12 am


Good stuff. Especially, at the moment, the notion of sin being ingrained in the warp and woof of structures so as to inculcate ongoing injustices. And seeing the results of sins into ongoing generations. Wow! If that stuff isn’t self-evident. Everywhere we can see it. Even as we try to break chains or see them broken.



report abuse
 

Dana Ames

posted April 27, 2006 at 12:16 pm


Does “external expression” of wrath refer to God swooping into history/life with destruction, or is it something else?
The “internal expression” brings to mind God having “subjected creation to futility”; is it connected to that?
I already put this book on my wish list. Must attend to that. Too many books!
Dana



report abuse
 

Simon Fowler

posted April 27, 2006 at 5:40 pm


Following on Dana’s comment, also in Romans, “God gave them over …” also demonstrates the God’s wrath is worked out in the ‘naturally’ infectious nature of sin. As though sin itself is part of God’s wrath. But aren’t there also ‘external expressions’ of God’s wrath in Scripture (Exodus?, Ananias and Sapphira? The end of time?) – are we talking about the difference between ‘natural’/normative and extraordinary?
Dana – on a side note: I think it was you who a while ago mentioned “The Complex Christ” by Kester Brewin? I knew him and saw the early work he and friends were doing when I lived in London, so your mention prompted me to get back in touch with him. Thanks!



report abuse
 

Kerry Doyal

posted April 28, 2006 at 10:48 am


The cover story for the latest CT mentions you . . . Any reply forthcoming?



report abuse
 

Bruce Smith

posted April 28, 2006 at 8:54 pm


This is a really interesting post and a position to which I am inclined to agree. Thanks for sharing it.



report abuse
 

Anonymous

posted April 29, 2006 at 10:37 pm


Mr. Aston.org » Atonement: The Problem 6 – from Jesus Creed

[...] Atonement: The Problem 6: [...]



report abuse
 

Ted Gossard,

posted May 8, 2006 at 5:10 am


Great summary Scot, on this chapter.
I am struck by how our lack of understanding of this concept of sin in Scripture hurts how we help others in our churches (including ourselves), and how our maturity can be a kind of stunted maturity (from earlier part of this book, I believe- there making a different point as I recall it, but still valid with this point, I think).
I appreciated his work on sin’s twist of reality and how this affects us so deeply, even from very early on, as we enter into a world of systemic sin and evil (unlike Adam and Eve). And how we are thus limited in our moral perception and corresponding thoughts and acts.
This book excels in helping us see the complexity of sin unraveled by social scientists and psychologists kind of studies, etc., that contain truth, and then seen to perhaps better bring understanding to the account of Scripture, than some theological stances taken on sin. Like the emphasis on forgiveness of sins to the practical exclusion of the ongoing patterns and damage that the forgiven sin continues to carry on. So that these patterns can be broken.
For anyone reading my meanderings here, don’t think the book is a psychology or sociology book. It is a Biblical theological book. But it does call to our attention some studies that mirror the complexity of humanity and sin, as we find it in Scripture.
I’m glad I read the book, and have it to reread and refer to. It has broadened my Scriptural understanding of sin, and really gives me a better understanding of what God in Christ is redeeming us from.



report abuse
 

Mike

posted July 4, 2006 at 10:25 am


Take a look at a scholarly article by R. Larry Shelton “A Covenant Concept of Atonement” first published in the Wesley Theological Journal, and now available online at wesley.nnu.edu/wesleyan_theology/theojrnl/16-20/19-09.htm
It is a study of the implications of ‘berith’ or covenant, for our understanding of reconciling with God. Shelton deals with the limitations of traditional thinking about the atonement.
QUOTE
The Biblical concept of covenant describes an interpersonal relationship and the Biblical metaphors for salvation, such as husband—wife and father—son, are profoundly personal. This understanding of the reconciling love of a personal God appeals strongly to an alienated society which sees no future but despair.
Christ’s sacrificial act of submissive obedience to God in the face of the sin of self—righteous humanity is the supreme historical revelation of God’s self—giving love. As a vicarious expression of penitence for all humanity who will participate in Christ’s life and death by faith, Christ enables a grieving God to believe in us again. The love which goes to such lengths to win back a “crooked and perverse generation” creates hope anew for a world which is lacking in integrity, trust, and community.
Furthermore, the covenant model, since it is Biblical, provides a balance which prevents an overemphasis on either mere sentimentality or on the rigid deterministic categories which obscure both the seeking love of God and the reality of His actual work in the believer.
ENDQUOTE



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.