Yesterday, sitting in the living room sipping on coffee and peeking out the picture window, I was waiting for the FedEx man to arrive at our home because the edited manuscript of The Real Mary was scheduled to arrive before 10:30am. I met him at the door. Now sit back and listen to the story of what it is like to encounter the “edits” on a manuscript. If you think writing is fun, you haven’t yet had a good editor. It hurts.
I begin with this: my editor, Lil Copan, is the best I’ve ever worked with — and I mean nothing about other editors I’ve worked with, each of whom has been more than good. Here’s why: she’s got a superb aesthetic sense of how books work. I don’t. I was trained as an academic, and I found English writing classes incredibly boring because all they talked about was novels — which I found and still do find … I’ll not go there. But, this I have learned: novelists have an aesthetic for how plot works and how themes work with plots and how characters work inside plots and themes. Lil sees things and hears things and feels things I never see, hear, or feel.
Well, we in the academic world by and large (and I judge this by the books I read and how the scholars who write them talk about their writing) don’t think of plot (we think of argument) or themes (we think of subject) or characters (we think of evidence). We think of method. That is why we generally write books no one reads. Sometimes we’re a bit proud no one reads (or can read) our books. I’ll avoid taking this down that road.
So, Lil sends me comments and she marks up my manuscript in green with suggestions like “Clunky” or “Rewrite sentence” or “Delete” or “Too colloquial” or “Choppy”. Sometimes I duck when I turn to the next page. She uses “green” because “red” hurts more than green. Now how sensitive is that?! Every comment she makes is considered, every one of them serious, and I’ve learned to take every one of them into consideration.
Every now and then she has an exclamation point in the margin — that means “very good.” I relish those. I wish they were more often. Every now and then she says “poetic.” I do a little jig when I read that.
Lil’s a writer herself (a novelist) and she feels my books from the inside out; she wants one idea per chapter (very hard for me to pull off) and a nice easy pace (and I rush ideas). So, with all her fine sense of taste and my academic intent, she is led to make suggestions. I wouldn’t have it any other way, and I’ve learned tons — and I feel like I’m just beginning. Not (mind you) that I think I’m terrible, or that she thinks that: it’s just (as she says it) “it could be much better.”
Now here’s what happens when I get the manuscript from Lil: First, I dread it coming because I know what’s going to happen. Second, I get the comments and the edited manuscript and I take a quick look to see how bad it is, and then I walk around the house feeling like spider puke and like I have no idea what I’m doing. Yesterday I ended up meandering in the basement and the little cricket who found his way into our home seemed to have an edge to him: like he was chirping at me for what he thought were some bad sentences. Third, then I get a little mad and so I walk around a little more. I think I’ll just not finish the thing, that I’ll go back to writing journal articles because the editors will leave me alone.
Fourth, in an hour (or two) or so I get over it and open up the edits and open up the computer file for the book. Then I start chipping away at the suggestions, arguing with Lil a bit in my study and saying “No way, Lil. I like that expression. Well, maybe she’s got a point. Well, you know, she’s right. I’ll change it.” Fifth, then I work my way through the manuscript and I say: “You know, Lil makes my prose better every time and the book is much better because of her.”
Sixth, I call her and tell her what a great editor she is and that I’ll miss chatting with her when this book is all over but that I’ll be back. And that I’ll see her at SBL and I look forward to chatting.
Seventh, then I fear I may hear her say: “Maybe next time Paraclete will give his next manuscript to someone else who paid attention in English classes.” (And my father is a retired English teacher!)
Then I begin to think that her green is gold, and I think “Next time, I’ll give her something she won’t need to edit.”
Here’s a big compliment: I feel like I’m chasing the perfect round of golf because of Lil. Someday, I say to myself, I’ll send Lil a manuscript and she’ll say, “Well, Scot, you did it. I’ve got nothing to suggest.” Never. I believe Lil would have had suggestions for Hemingway (ever hear of an adjective, papa?).
Lil’s the best. A good editor is a tough editor.
posted August 24, 2006 at 6:51 am
Scot,
This is too good. You are so descriptive–”feeling like spider puke”–LOL. I can just see you pacing the house, giving Lil a piece of your mind. Oh the joys of writing and revising! Thanks for letting us into this part of your life. ALSO, tremendous advice for Joel as a new colleague. You are a sensitive pastoral theologian-scholar.
posted August 24, 2006 at 7:44 am
Sounds familiar. To reduce the sting of editorial comments, one of my colleagues in the English Dept. has switched from red to green to “foo foo purple.” Her words. Perhaps that’s in store for your next book.
Tim
posted August 24, 2006 at 8:03 am
This was so good to read because I’m an editor myself–one of those journal editors that is expected to “leave you alone.” Even worse, our publication is online. You wouldn’t believe the reactions I get from some writers. I know how strongly writers feel about their sentences because I feel the same way about my editorial suggestions. There is a little piece of God in each one.
I read somewhere that writers love their neighbors by loving their readers. I guess editors love their neighbors by loving their writers.
Sounds like Lil loves you like herself.
posted August 24, 2006 at 10:04 am
You know what Stephen Kings says: the editor is always right. But an editor who can speak the truth with kindness is like gold. Most editors are ruthless, like me.
An editor’s first concern is making the connection between writer and audience: if no one reads the book or understand what you wrote, then all the pain and anguish and sleepless nights were in vain.
posted August 24, 2006 at 10:13 am
Bob,
You’re right and you’ve been hard and good to me in my pieces for Covenant Companion.
Mark,
I’ve been one of those writers — muttering under my breath about some editorial comment. What Bob Smietana says in #4 about Stephen King is right: the editor is always (or almost always) right. (That’s what I’m doing right now: doing what Lil suggests.)
posted August 24, 2006 at 10:38 am
Thanks Scot.
BTW, I always feel like spider puke when I’m writing–so I’m always pleasantly suprised when an editor likes my work.
posted August 24, 2006 at 10:46 am
By the way, I first saw this expression “spider puke” in Anne Lamott’s Bird by Bird, xv.
posted August 24, 2006 at 11:09 am
pastors could use editors. probably more than one.
posted August 24, 2006 at 11:17 am
I love the clarity of your writing, Scot. I guess I have to thank Lil for most of that!?! Though it’s certainly true, that in my case as well, I don’t see what someone like Lil sees.
And I second what John says about your post to Joel! (from my much more limited perspective)
posted August 24, 2006 at 11:17 am
Thanks for the encouragement, Scot. I sometimes find myself muttering under my breath about writers who argue with every editorial suggestion. I guess, it works both ways.
posted August 24, 2006 at 3:48 pm
Scot,
So I had coffee this afternoon with the pastor of my local church, and a key question came up that stumps me.
How can you extol the virtues of becoming a good writer by reading and appreciating good writing and not realize that this includes novels and plays and such?
Somehow “trained as an academic” doesn’t really explain it.
Oh well,
posted August 24, 2006 at 10:26 pm
It reminded me of Lamott talking of the self defeating words that go on before she gets out of bed. We love it cuz we relate to it.
I’m an artist, I mostly paint. My version of walking around the house muttering, is the time after a painting is supposedly done, but must hang on my living room wall until I figure out how I can make it better. I still have one on my wall, been there 10 yrs or so. Just not satisfied with it and I won’t sell it till I am. My hubby teases me about that aspect. Says my paintings never would be done if I had my way.
Your candor in this entry was refreshing Scot. I guess we all have parts that feel like spider puke now and then. and I chuckle as I write that.
posted August 26, 2006 at 1:51 am
Scot, THANKS for your example of honesty and humility.