Jesus Creed

Jesus Creed

Do Calvinists understand Arminianism? 10

posted by xscot mcknight | 2:22am Tuesday October 31, 2006

This is our last in the series on Roger Olson’s book, Arminian Theology. Myth #10 is that Arminians adhere to the “governmental theory of atonement.” Most may not know what this theory holds, and most may never have heard that Arminians believe this.
First, what does this theory hold? It is not easy to describe. It maintains that the death of Christ upheld public justice and moral government; it honors God by demonstrating God’s justice; and Christ’s death is a “substitution” for our penalty, but not an actual suffering of our punishment. (The view seeks to avoid limited and universal atonement.) So, the death of Christ exhibits how seriously God takes sin and shows that God wants his justice to be upheld. The death of Christ, in the governmental theory, was non-necessary.
Second, do Arminians believe this? Some do, but most don’t. Arminius doesn’t. Wesley doesn’t. Thomas Oden doesn’t. Who does? John Miley, H. Orton Wiley, Charles Finney, and the architect of the view, Hugo Grotius.
What we learn from this book is that we need to be careful what we call “Arminian.” I’m now ready for a book that summarizes the myths Arminians use against Calvinists. If someone writes such a book, I hope they are as careful and charitable as Roger Olson was.



Leave a Comment »
Related Topics: Atonement, Books, Theology
beliefnet
  list archives most recent most popular  
beliefnet
Previous Posts

This blog is no longer active
This blog is no longer being actively updated. Please feel free to browse the archives or: Read our most popular inspiration blog See our most popular inspirational video Take our most popular quiz

posted 3:10:39pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Our Common Prayerbook 30 - 3
Psalm 30 thanks God (vv. 1-3, 11-12) and exhorts others to thank God (vv. 4-5). Both emerge from the concrete reality of David's own experience. Here is what that experience looks like:Step one: David was set on high and was flourishing at the hand of God's bounty (v. 7a).Step two: David became too

posted 12:15:30pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Theology After Darwin 1 (RJS)
One of the more important and more difficult pieces of the puzzle as we feel our way forward at the interface of science and faith is the theological implications of discoveries in modern science. A comment on my post Evolution in the Key of D: Deity or Deism noted: ...this reminds me of why I get a

posted 6:01:52am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Almost Christian 4
Who does well when it comes to passing on the faith to the youth? Studies show two groups do really well: conservative Protestants and Mormons; two groups that don't do well are mainline Protestants and Roman Catholics. Kenda Dean's new book is called Almost Christian: What the Faith of Ou

posted 12:01:53am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Let's Get Neanderthal!
The Cave Man Diet, or Paleo Diet, is getting attention. (Nothing is said about Culver's at all.) The big omission, I have to admit, is that those folks were hunters -- using spears or smacking some rabbit upside the conk or grabbing a fish or two with their hands ... but that's what makes this diet

posted 2:05:48pm Aug. 30, 2010 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(3)
post a comment
Matthew

posted October 31, 2006 at 10:35 am


Thank you for this series. My view of Arminianism has been mostly from afar and in caricatures. This has been interesting and helpful reading. I know I will refer back to it in the future.
I would love to see the Calvinist counterpart as well.



report abuse
 

Rick

posted October 31, 2006 at 10:48 am


I think an important point here is to understand the, “some do, but most don’t” concept. Because on almost every contention listed in the series, there are some that do.
So the stereotypes, if you want to call them that, are true in part. But to ignorantly label all who may fall under the larger umbrella of Arminianism as holding to them would be wrong. The same applies for Calvinism; and I would hope that whether on either side, each would not be as equally ignorant to make broad, unwarranted accusations.



report abuse
 

Jon B

posted November 1, 2006 at 7:44 am


I’ve just finished the book too, and found that it deepened my understanding of both Arminianism and Calvanism. The way Olson tries to be irenic (biased, yes, but I think always fair) allows him to draw the parallels that show the strengths and weaknesses of each system well.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story

Related Topics: Atonement, Books, Theology
beliefnet
  list archives most recent most popular  
beliefnet

About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.