Dear Emma,
You've asked me what I think of Brian McLaren, and I assume by that you are talking about his many writings. And you've asked me "how" to think about him. As a person, Brian is gracious and kind, disarming and quiet, and unlike most Christian leaders I've encountered, the sort of man that makes you feel important when he is with you. Character counts a lot for me, and so I hope you can meet him some day: you will experience him as a genuine (if new kind of) Christian.
You mentioned that you have read some scary things about Brian on blogs. Which raises a sadness for me: if you were to google Brian McLaren's name and then read what (supposed) Christians have said about him, you'd have a good illustration of lions eating their young. I was recently telling a student that if Brian were a non-Christian, the one thing he'd never become is an evangelical. Some of his critics have done everything but show the grace of Christ to him. To return to my earlier point about his character, he remains gracious in spite of how many evangelicals have treated him. No matter how much we value orthodoxy, we can never justify being mean-spirited and malicious as we defend it.
Nearly everyone asks me about his Generous Orthodoxy (because it is his most theological book) or about A New Kind of Christian -- one piece of fiction I have read. I think I told you in an earlier letter that, as Kris sometimes says of me, I'm not constitutionally capable of reading fiction. But, I did read New Kind.
Let me give you a piece of advice about Brian's books: he is a deliberate provocateur, and he's about as good at it as anyone I've ever met. Your questions to me concern his "orthodoxy." He says things at times that I'd say differently, but we should read Brian for what he is doing and not as a systematic theologian. He is trying to get evangelical Christians -- and you say you are "kinda and kinda not" an evangelical -- to ask new questions about beliefs that have gone largely unchallenged for a century. If you read Generous Orthodoxy -- many of us in the emerging movement shorten that book in writing to GO -- for what it is, you will be led into all kinds of questions and Brian's GO will drive you back to the Bible to make you think what you really do believe.
Take Mary, for instance. Brian tells a story about being near a big image of Mary and he found himself weeping. I don't remember all the details -- I'm pretty sure it is found in GO -- but it shows how he can get you to think. That scene made me think about why Mary's image is so evocative for so many today (do you find yourself attracted to her? do you think it is because "absence [among evangelicals] makes their heart grow fonder"?). It made me think about what the Bible does say -- and what both the Roman Catholics and the Eastern Orthodox have taught and how the Reformers themselves had very high thoughts about Mary. And I found myself reading the Magnificat and the next thing I knew I was doing exactly what Brian intends -- asking questions. Well, that's an illustration from my life. Maybe you have others -- do you?
If Brian is a provocative writer, he is also doing something that takes great courage: he's trying to reconstruct Christianity from the ground up. Brian wants to know what is at the bottom, what is the essence, what is most important, how are we to live and what are we to believe. And, this means Brian is willing to question everything and everyone. But Brian's questioning is not so much skepticism as it is questioning and conversation. "Conversation" is one of Brian's favorite terms -- and as an emerging Christian myself I agree with him. Let's not fight about all this; let's ask questions and listen to one another. Even if I find myself disagreeing with Brian at times, I do enjoy the conversation. I'd rather discuss Mary with Brian than with almost anyone I know. (Which I've only done briefly.)
One more thing for you to think about when it comes to Brian: he has become more and more politically active. Really, I'm not sure it is accurate to say this since I don't know that much about Brian's political action a decade or so ago. But, Brian is more aligned with folks like Jim Wallis, and he's talking more about environment and social justice. One time you told me you liked my expression "purple theology." Well confession time for me: I swiped that from Brian's article when he spoke about "purple politics." Brian says Christians need to be more "purple" in their politics, and I'm a big fan of that idea. I hope Brian will lead many to be genuinely purple. It seems to me that far too many Christians place sooooo much hope in the election process and think that if a Democrat or a Republican wins then everything will be better -- I don't believe that. It doesn't make that much difference in my judgment. That is why I hope more and more of us can be purple. Brian has stated that -- and we'll have to see how it all turns out.
I'm sorry this letter got so long.
Blessings,
Scot
This begins a new weekly series on letters and ideas I have exchanged with young emerging Christians, bu which I'm now cobbling together into coherent letters.
Add to Del.icio.us
Add to Technorati
Add to Digg
Add to Newsvine
Add to Facebook
Add to StumbleUpon
Subscribe
I've only read GO of his books and found parts of if very stimulating and challenging. He came across as a really nice guy. I like the idea of the title. However, I found the introductory part really difficult to read because it was so cloying. I also found it very frustrating - he poses some good questions but then offers no real or helpful response (but maybe that's because I'm too modern!).
But my major problem is where he leads. I say this cautiously because it has been a while since I read the book. I think what he says in GO leads to legalism. He might not be there himself but IMO his writing leads to a denial of the need for grace and a call for people to niceness. Ultimately your goodness will make you right. Jesus is reduced to a moral teacher. Like I said he might not believe that himself but for me he is a legalist, albeit with a nice smile. :-)
Hi Scot and Emma,
I took some pictures of the statue that Brian talks about in GO. You can take a look at them here.
Damon
Scot,
Was reading this post a few minutes ago (rather behind this week) and caught what you said in a comment,
"Will we ever learn that character and life cannot be divorced from what we believe, but that they actually reveal what we truly believe? I canât tell you the number of times Iâve participated in discussions when I thought â maybe the person won, but Iâd not want to be like them; or maybe I won, but âwhoâ was revealed?"
That is so very important! What I say I believe may be one thing but what I truly believe will be revealed in my character, my attitude, and in my words.
I once heard an old preacher say, "Jesus never made anybody mean." If that is true, and I think it is, and if my character reveals my real beliefs-- that ought to alarm me.
Scot,
Well I see it didn't take long for one of watch dog blogs to slam your post by saying "So we are to not judge Brian McClaren by what he, says and writes; only by what he does."
Do such groups even bother to actually read what someone writes? Or do their presuppositions get in the way?
I have throughly enjoyed McClaren's books. Yes, he says some things that cause "bells, whistles, and alarms" to go off but, in the end, I find such statements lead to some great discussions and no small amount of reflection. I certainly don't agree with all that he says, but I think his writings should be widely read and discussed.
The Evangelical Church is one sick puppy and she is in need of a course correction. Perhaps Brian is just asking us to Stop. Look. Re-evaluate. Think though what we are doing and where we are headed. Look again at the Scripture. What is it we really believe?
Brian McClaren helped me to see that (even as a pastor) it is OK to ask questions. It is OK to rethink what you "say" you believe.
It's wonderful to ask questions, but what Brian MacLaren does in everything I've read from him, on his website and in his books, is to signify that Chirstianity today is all wrong and he's got the answer. He seems to disagree that the Word of God is authoritative, and doesn't seem to believe that Christ's sacrifice was enough to save us.
Questions are good, but I know that there is a way to ask questions which brings you the desired result, and that's what I see when I read his words. His questions are quite directed.
It's possible to know with certainty what God has revealed in His Word, and yet he, among other Emergent followers, regularly refuse to take a stand on even the most clear doctrines.
Danger, danger!
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.