Jesus Creed

Jesus Creed

Against the Wall: Where not to look

posted by xscot mcknight | 2:10am Wednesday March 14, 2007

When your back is against the wall you know have to know not only where to look (to God) but also where not to look — and the psalmist explores that in vv. 155, 157-158. Here are his words:
155 Salvation is far from the wicked,
for they do not seek your statutes.

157 Many are my persecutors and my adversaries,
yet I do not swerve from your decrees.
158 I look at the faithless with disgust,
because they do not keep your commands.
The psalmist has enemies who neither know the Torah nor respect God. They are out to get him and put him to death. In fact, they’ve got him cornered as he writes this prayer to God.
He names them for what they are: “wicked” (reshaim), “persecutors” and “adversaries,” and he sees them as “faithless” (from bagal — treacherous, deceitful).
He knows their behaviors: “they do not seek your statutes” and “they do not keep your commands”.
He knows what he must do — stay the course by looking to God, trusting in God, and observing the Torah and avoid the course of action his enemies have chosen.



Previous Posts

This blog is no longer active
This blog is no longer being actively updated. Please feel free to browse the archives or: Read our most popular inspiration blog See our most popular inspirational video Take our most popular quiz

posted 3:10:39pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Our Common Prayerbook 30 - 3
Psalm 30 thanks God (vv. 1-3, 11-12) and exhorts others to thank God (vv. 4-5). Both emerge from the concrete reality of David's own experience. Here is what that experience looks like:Step one: David was set on high and was flourishing at the hand of God's bounty (v. 7a).Step two: David became too

posted 12:15:30pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Theology After Darwin 1 (RJS)
One of the more important and more difficult pieces of the puzzle as we feel our way forward at the interface of science and faith is the theological implications of discoveries in modern science. A comment on my post Evolution in the Key of D: Deity or Deism noted: ...this reminds me of why I get a

posted 6:01:52am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Almost Christian 4
Who does well when it comes to passing on the faith to the youth? Studies show two groups do really well: conservative Protestants and Mormons; two groups that don't do well are mainline Protestants and Roman Catholics. Kenda Dean's new book is called Almost Christian: What the Faith of Ou

posted 12:01:53am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Let's Get Neanderthal!
The Cave Man Diet, or Paleo Diet, is getting attention. (Nothing is said about Culver's at all.) The big omission, I have to admit, is that those folks were hunters -- using spears or smacking some rabbit upside the conk or grabbing a fish or two with their hands ... but that's what makes this diet

posted 2:05:48pm Aug. 30, 2010 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(17)
post a comment
Marcia

posted March 14, 2007 at 6:16 am


Is there some background to these “Against The Wall” posts?



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted March 14, 2007 at 7:09 am


Marcia,
Not sure what you are asking, but I’ve been doing a series on Psalm 119 and working our way through the whole.



report abuse
 

Marcia

posted March 14, 2007 at 7:11 am


That’s what I was asking. Thanks.



report abuse
 

CAS

posted March 14, 2007 at 10:01 am


Scot,
Are these enemies from within the house of Israel, ie. Saul, or are outside the family?



report abuse
 

CAS

posted March 14, 2007 at 10:03 am


and, how does it change the way we look at it when the “enemy” is family?



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted March 14, 2007 at 10:22 am


CAS,
Surely the psalmist’s co-religionists — fellow Jews who found the psalmist’s commitment to be over the top. I haven’t really thought much about the second question. Any thoughts yourself?



report abuse
 

CAS

posted March 14, 2007 at 10:35 am


Well, Scott, I have thought a lot about it… because I have lived it. I think the law of love has to govern our responses, but figuring out what love looks like in any given situation is the challenge–esp. when there are competing moral claims. Also, if the oppressor is harming the innocent–who have no power to respond, and we have some power to act, that, in my mind, supercedes our commitment to love the oppressor. Make sense?
I really wanted to know your thoughts, however!



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted March 14, 2007 at 10:45 am


CAS,
When you say “family” do you mean home or church?
By the way, I’m having a difficult time commenting on my own blog today — the system doesn’t seem to be working right.



report abuse
 

CAS

posted March 14, 2007 at 10:52 am


I’m having trouble commenting too–i keep losing my connection every time i hit the submit comment buttom.
i mean church.



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted March 14, 2007 at 11:03 am


CAS,
Nothing easy here. You have to work with the leadership and authority structures you have. If they are unwilling to work with you, you need to consult with someone you can trust within that church to see what they advise.
To love the oppressor means to fight against the oppressor’s injustices.



report abuse
 

CAS

posted March 14, 2007 at 11:07 am


Yes! thank you Scott. That is exactly what we did. I love your last comment: “To love the oppressor is to fight against the oppressor’s injustices.”



report abuse
 

Marcia

posted March 14, 2007 at 11:18 am


Okay, this comment is probably redundant now, because it WOULDN’T POST, but I’ll throw it out anyway:
CAS–I’m following this with real interest. I recently mused on this same thing on my own blog in reference to Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Was it right for him to plot to assassinate Hitler? What about Matthew 19?
18″Which ones?” the man inquired.
Jesus replied, ” ‘Do not murder, do not commit adultery, do not steal, do not give false testimony, 19honor your father and mother,’ and ‘love your neighbor as yourself.’”

He doesn’t say, do not murder unless the intended victim is a murderous, crazed dictator. He doesn’t say, do not give false witness unless you are trying to protect yourself or others. He says don’t do it, period.
So I’m quite curious as to how to work out exactly what you said–what if the oppressor is harming the innocent?



report abuse
 

CAS

posted March 14, 2007 at 11:30 am


Marcia,
The situation I referred to is briefly summarized in the current issue of Christianity Today in an article called “Day of Reckoning.” It was a very difficult set of circumstances to navigate, and the cost was extremely high for me, my husband, and our children.
I’ll ponder your question re. Bonhoeffer and comment later. I must go to work now.



report abuse
 

Marcia

posted March 14, 2007 at 11:34 am


Oh, in my many attempts at commenting I somehow lost the part where I said that I realized that this wasn’t exactly the same thing you were talking about, CAS, but that I was following along just the same.



report abuse
 

Jennifer

posted March 14, 2007 at 12:03 pm


I think it’s very interesting that in this post we are looking at scripture teaching us to call out to God, and in the other thread, we are looking at what happens when God doesnt seem to answer of cry for help.
The most confusing stories of all are the ones where people are calling out to God for intimacy, and he doesnt seem to hear or answer.



report abuse
 

cas

posted March 14, 2007 at 3:08 pm


Marcia,
Hindsight obviously allows us to empathize with Bonhoeffer’s plot to assasinate a genocidal sociopath. We wish he had done it. Things don’t work out so neatly in real life as they do in our fantasies, however. It’s not quite the same scenario, but our government, was, I believe, involved in putting Sadam Hussein into power, and now in overthrowing him, and look at the quagmire.
As to the idea of lying, murdering, etc. for a greater good. That’s sticky. I reject utilitarian reasoning. But Rahab is commended in Hebrews and her faith included some deception to protect another. Where does that leave us? It leaves us with the fact that life is messy, and we do the best we can, in the power of the Spirit, to do the right thing.
A pastor I know once said even our best deeds are tainted by sin. That’s the part that will be burned up and tossed into the fire. What’s left as a work of the Spirit will have its reward.
Sometimes we have no choice but to act and live with the consequences.



report abuse
 

Ted Gossard

posted March 15, 2007 at 4:09 am


Yes. Avoid fighting fire with fire. Avoid stooping to their level in retaliating. But look to God, in faith in him and his promises.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.