With Mary and John Baptist now watching from the sideline (as it were), Jesus becomes the center stage as we work our way through the themes connected to Missional Jesus.
No better place to begin that Luke 4:16-30.
1. Missional Jesus publicly announces the centrality of himself to the mission of God (4:21).
2. Missional Jesus sees his own mission in Isa 61:1-2, that means his mission involves justice for the poor, prisoners, the blind, and the oppressed.
[Note: Jesus sounds like Mary and John Baptist.]
3. The mission of Jesus is a Jubilee mission (4:19).
4. The mission of Jesus creates disturbances and rejection (4:24).
5. Homies reject Jesus (4:24-29).
6. The mission of Jesus will extend beyond the normal boundaries.
Luke 4:16 He went to Nazareth, where he had been brought up, and on the Sabbath day he went into the synagogue, as was his custom. He stood up to read, 17 and the scroll of the prophet Isaiah was handed to him. Unrolling it, he found the place where it is written: 18 “The Spirit of the Lord is on me,
because he has anointed me
to proclaim good news to the poor.
He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners
and recovery of sight for the blind,
to set the oppressed free,
19 to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.”f
Luke 4:20 Then he rolled up the scroll, gave it back to the attendant and sat down. The eyes of everyone in the synagogue were fastened on him. 21 He began by saying to them, “Today this scripture is fulfilled in your hearing.”
Luke 4:22 All spoke well of him and were amazed at the gracious words that came from his lips. “Isn’t this Joseph’s son?” they asked.
Luke 4:23 Jesus said to them, “Surely you will quote this proverb to me: ‘Physician, heal yourself!’ And you will tell me, ‘Do here in your hometown what we have heard that you did in Capernaum.’”
Luke 4:24 “Truly I tell you,” he continued, “prophets are not accepted in their hometowns. 25 I assure you that there were many widows in Israel in Elijah’s time, when the sky was shut for three and a half years and there was a severe famine throughout the land. 26 Yet Elijah was not sent to any of them, but to a widow in Zarephath in the region of Sidon. 27 And there were many in Israel with leprosyg in the time of Elisha the prophet, yet not one of them was cleansed—only Naaman the Syrian.”
Luke 4:28 All the people in the synagogue were furious when they heard this. 29 They got up, drove him out of the town, and took him to the brow of the hill on which the town was built, in order to throw him off the cliff. 30 But he walked right through the crowd and went on his way.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon












Scot,
Thank you for not neglecting the money end of justice. As I wrestle with how to serve and help the poor, a friend has helped me to see how far from poor I really am. I can sell my house and live in a community home. I can give away money. I can let my cars be used by whomever asked. I could lose my job and not have an income. Yet, I will always have my family, my education, my friends and so much more. Justice for me is giving people who have not even had the chance to succeed, the chance. Being real and honest and not trying to pretend I am impoverished.
I am seeing the Missional Jesus as even more radical than the Jesus I know. I look around and see so many people oppressed by racism and poverty. I want to be a part of their freedom through Christ.
Diane,
Yes. I absolutely agree. Maybe the problem that people on the traditional 'left' side of this issue have with the phrase 'mercy for the poor' is that we fear that mercy is perceived as optional or small in scope, while 'justice' implies that whatever we must do for the poor is mandatory. It's similar to my issue with the phrase 'justice for the poor': My concern isn't the mandatory part of justice, but that people will think of American/Western/capitalist 'justice' which, literally, imposes no positve obligation at all on me for my neighbor or even the man bleeding on the side of the road. American justice says that I have the right to ignore people in need. But according to God, both 'mercy' and 'justice' are different: love is literally his law, and to be just is to love as he practices and defines it.
I think we have the same concern of each term not going far enough in our context despite the biblical conceptions. But, yes, mercy, not just in the heart but also in the hand, is not optional for people who have received so much mercy of every possible form from the King (which is everyone and every institution and authority structure.) Maybe part of what people are thinking with the 'justice' terminology is that current legal systems need also to be adjusted (like the Jubilee, interest charges, gleaning, etc.), and that 'mercy' implies only individual (not institutional) response. I can see that, but I think every person and power has a responsibility to act with the the grace God has and continues to hold things together with, or will give an account for why they didn't do so. Our first amendment is great, but it does not excuse anyone (from Christ's perspective) from structuring and governing a society in a way that works against his goals and value structure. I know that poses other interesting and difficult questions, and I'm not talking about legistating something as impossible as agape, but His lordship and value structure are facts every individual and power structure would be wise to deal with. Is this what Mary was saying? That all powers were on notice of the real King?
Thanks for the conversation.
"Missional Jesus sees his own mission in Isa 61:1-2, that means his mission involves justice for the poor, prisoners, the blind, and the oppressed."
Do you find it interesting that Jesus stops short of quoting verse 2. Not that there were verse markers in the text from which He was quoting, but isn't it interesting that he stopped mid-sentence?
I think the focus of the prophecy is not what Jesus is doing, but I rather see it as a prophetical marker to point out: hey, Messiah is here folks; a new era in God's plan is about to unfold. But wait, it's not time for vengeance yet, that part isn't fulfilled until later.
Dave, I think you're placing too much emphasis on the bit quoted in the text. Both in biblical (you see it in Paul all the time) and extra-biblical texts, a small bit of the referenced text was quoted in order to evoke the entire passage. It's similar to what we do by referencing the chapter division to which we're referring. When a bit is quoted, you typically need to go back and read the entire passage from which that bit is taken.
Coherant answer. Thanks. I'm not sure that I agree on this particular verse, but your answer is logical as well. Thanks.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.