Jesus Creed

Friday is for Friends

Friday November 30, 2007

Categories: Kingdom of God
Any time someone brings up the petitions in the Lord's prayer that concern God's kingdom coming and God's will being realized faces the inevitable: What does the Lord's Prayer say about political power and global issues? In chp 4 of...
Advertisement
Comments
Peggy
November 30, 2007 1:02 AM
http://abisomeone.blogspot.com/

Makes perfect sense to me: the Holy Spirit is that which both reveals God's will to us and enables obedience by us. The Holy Spirit, in this way, is God's activity of faithful covenant-keeping.

I tremble to even mention that perichoresis flitted across my mind as you talked of "interplay of wills in the Trinity"! 8)

Ted M. Gossard
November 30, 2007 2:52 AM
http://communityofjesus.blogspot.com/

I like this, too. The Spirit as the will of the Father- in Jesus, and in the community of God in Jesus, in this world. So that the Spirit's primary work in this world to the principalities and powers is to be through the church (Ephesians), God thus showing his manifold wisdom.

And the thought on reconciliation; a good argument for us to not give up on engaging the powers, yet to do so in the peace and perseverance of Christ- in God's grace.

Diane
November 30, 2007 7:45 AM

This sounds akin to the early Quakers' assertion that Jesus Christ has come to teach us himself, without the need of priests. The Quakers thus sat in silent worship, waiting for the Holy Spirit (the"Light") to instruct them corporately as to God's will. Then--the amazing part--they acted on it, even if it didn't make sense. Now they act, but I would argue more out of reason than from intense communion with the HS. That being said, your summary only whets my appetite to actually read the book, which I can imagine going in a very different direction from the early Quakers.

Darren
November 30, 2007 7:57 AM

Maybe it's not the same thing, but his point about the Holy Spirit reminds me of Lesslie Newbigin's idea in (I think) The Gospel in a Pluralist Society, where he talks about the presence of the "new reality" in the world, the Holy Spirit poured out on all believers. God's will is that this new reality become more and more manifest in the world.
The crowd at Pentecost said they had never seen anything like what they were seeing that day. It was totally new, God had come down to live among humanity in the person of Jesus Christ, now he was living IN humanity by the Holy Spirit. It still is a new reality. It still is God's will, and the way we live out God's will.

josenmiami
November 30, 2007 9:36 AM
http://kairosrevolution.blogspot.com/

My first thought in reading your post was “ahhhh… a friendly conversation sounds good after the Calvinism-Arminian war,” and then my second thought as I got down through the paragraph was, “crap! more books to order.”

I can’t keep up with you Scot…I am still doing grad school reading. The problem is, all of the books you mention sound like “must reads” for me…hence my dilemma. I think what I am going to do is enter this books into my bibliographic database and link your commentary to them as notes…to go back later when I have more time.

Both books by Telford and Humphrey sound extremely interesting to me. Telford’s, because my research interest in the masters and now in the doctoral studies is church and state, faith and politics. As I go along, I generate more questions than answers. You (or rather Telford) are absolutely right in my opinion about political visions and the connection to the self. There no one In history who has had a greater impact politically than Jesus, and yet he did it by surrendering the self, and praying “not my will but thy will be done.”

I used to pray the “Our Father” every morning with a special emphasis on “Let your kingdom come, Let your will be done in MY HEART as it is in heaven…”

I have also been on a quest to discover a deeper experiential relationship with the Holy Spirit. “The kingdom of God is … righteousness, peace and joy IN THE HOLY SPIRIT.” Your (Telford’s) comment on God’s will being the Holy Spirit is fascinating.

I finished reading the last chapter of biography of Pope John XXIII by Christian Feldman yesterday, through my tears on the treadmill – impacted by the political influence of that good man. Here is a priceless quote from page 138: “And finally, this can’t be said often enough: He trusted the Holy Spirit.”

Pope Roncalli went from being a farmer’s kid, to being the spiritual leader of a billion Catholics by simply being good, kind to others and faithful to God. He was ready to leave this earth to go to be with God in 1939, almost 20 years before becoming the Pope. Not only did he change the face of Catholicism with Vatican II, but on October 25, 1962, he was instrumental in helping Kennedy and Khrushchev pull back from the brink of global nuclear war because he had taken the time and the risk to begin to build some trust and conversation with Khrushchev a few months earlier. “For such a time as this…”

Diane #3: I LOVE the Quakers! I started visiting a “Friends” church recently. I like the quite, and the idea of holding people in the light…and I am not in the mood to listen to some guy talk for 45 minutes.

Darren #4: Do you know the name of the book by Newbigin? Sounds like another book I should read if it deals with pluralism.

Paul D.
November 30, 2007 9:47 AM

"The Spirit as the will of the Father" and of the Son. This is how I understand such assertions by Paul as "we have the mind of Christ." (1 Cor. 2:16) This concept is appealing for its dynamic quality as well as keeping both the goal and way of spirituality together, with implications far beyond that of faith and politics. Good stuff.

T
November 30, 2007 10:34 AM
http://www.getting-free.blogspot.com

This sounds good. It makes me think, among other things, that "obedience is better than sacrifice." I realize that some use this as an excuse to ignore many larger global issues, but don't we inevitably have to ignore many important things in order to effectively obey God's call on us particularly? (Jesus limited the scope of his work out of obedience, as did the 12 after him, as did Paul, as did Mother Teresa, etc.) It sounds like Telford is saying that any 'worthy' activity can still be done out of selfishness, and frequently is, as a compromise means of avoiding or usurping God's particular governance of us through the Spirit.

It makes me think too, that the Holy Spirit is often rightly associated with power, but it is not an impersonal power. It is the Spirit, the very inner person, of God himself. If any person's will is within that person's spirit, then the will of God is also within his Spirit. The kingdom of God is justice, peace and joy IN the Holy Spirit (in the will of God, as part of his inner person). I'm seeing that verse much differently right now, as I am with "kingdom" itself. Much thanks to you and to Telford.

Howard Walters
November 30, 2007 11:12 AM

There something very incarnational in this line of thinking about the will of God and Holy Spirit. Paul's thinking in Ephesians about Jesus being "formed in us" by the Spirit also adds a piece. As God Himself is incarnated in us, and as we die and He lives through us and is increasingly formed and present in us, then God does "do His will" on earth as we/He acts in union. So the Holy Spirit as the Will of God is true both as the means to God's end (as the Spirit enlivens and empowers us, and indwells us) and also as the end itself, as God chooses to be with His people and to make this earth His kindgom. So the prayer that "God's kingdom would come and His will be done" is one not of dominance, but a prayer of submission--that we would be crucified and die that He might be incarnate in us to do His will and create His kingdom. Living out the Jesus Creed can then be conceived less as "we are creating the conditions of God's kingdom" and more construed as "we are getting out of the way and letting God build His own kingdom" as we "present our bodies as instruments of righteousness. May we be reduced and may Christ be formed in us all! This is a great conversation thread to move into Advent!

Howard Walters
November 30, 2007 11:16 AM

A comment about Jesus Creed (not necessarily belonging here): the section in the book about Joseph and Mary is one of the most moving treatments of the "Christmas Story" I've ever encountered. We're reading these sections as a family out loud on Christmas Eve this year. I can't even read the Joseph section without tears and I've encouraged folks in our faith community to use this devotionally this year. Blessings Scot for your gift!

Kyle Strobel
November 30, 2007 12:10 PM
http://Metamorpha.com

Scot, thanks for your thoughts on the book. I haven't read Work's book, but your comment on the Spirit as the Will of God reminded me of a conversation you and I had at AAR. This is exactly what Jonathan Edwards argued in his "Discourse on the Trinity," that the Spirit was the Will of God (which would also be God's love), and the Son was the understanding / idea (and therefore image) of God. So for Edwards, a person is that which has understanding and will, and therefore personhood in God is grounded in the perichoretic union the three have within the inner life of the Trinity.

So for Edwards, it is God's will / love that unites believers to union with himself, and therefore spirituality consists of an inclination and disposition at the heart of the believer that is grounded in that union with the will of God.

Not too many people interact with Edwards on his trinitarian understanding (although that is rapidly changing), but it seems like there might be some resources here that overlap what Work is trying to accomplish in his book.

Friend of Pascal
November 30, 2007 12:43 PM

Jose, I think Darren #4 references "The Gospel in a Pluralist Society."

Peggy
November 30, 2007 12:46 PM
http://abisomeone.blogspot.com/

josenmiami,

"The Gospel in a Pluralistic Society" is the name of Newbigin's book. :)

Thanks, Kyle...that's two occurrences of perichoresis, now ;)

Dana Ames
November 30, 2007 12:53 PM

Speaking of tears, Howard, your comment #8 brought them to my eyes... Thank you.
Dana

Peggy
November 30, 2007 1:05 PM
http://abisomeone.blogspot.com/

Aaugh...sorry...let me just post the link, Jose....

http://www.amazon.com/Gospel-Pluralist-Society-Lesslie-Newbigin/dp/0802804268

fjs
November 30, 2007 1:34 PM

today that is what I want... "let your kingdom come, let your Will be done on earth as it is in heaven." somedays when i see so much injustice, that is all that i can even pray. it becomes like a jesus prayer that is repeated again and again and again because there are no other words to voice the longing. one cannot even think what to pray--so we allow the Spirit/Will to groan within.

RonMck
November 30, 2007 2:35 PM
http://getrad2.blogspot.com

Your question, “How can we read the prophets or Jesus and not think of political powers? The issue is how we engage the powers.“ is an important one.

In theory the answer is easy: we just follow wherever the Spirit and the scriptures lead us. In practice this is hard, because we are usually so attached to our political institutions and nationalisms that we cannot hear what the Spirit and the word are saying.

For example, my reading of 1 Sam 8 is the presidency will have to go before the Kingdom of God can come. My reading of Deuteronomy is that there is not place for Congress in the kingdom of God. My reading of Galatians 5:20-21 concludes that there cannot be political parties in the Kingdom of God (not even if it is Republican). My reading of Daniel 7: says that a union of states is very dangerous.

My reading of these passages may be wrong, but I suspect that most Americans cannot even begin to consider the possibility that they are correct, because their attachment to their political institutions is stronger than their attachment to the word of God. This leave no choice but to rush to that old serpentine line, “Did God really say that…..?”

Confronting the powers is not enough; we also have to confront our own idols. Idols sit on the high places, but they are constructed in our hearts.

Shlomo ben Yaakov
November 30, 2007 2:55 PM
http://www.xanga.com/ps29v11

B"H

Hi Scot,

I was wondering if the comment, Thus, “Constantine is not the villain; we are” (103) is possibly a mild rebuke of Yoder's position?

Shlomo

BeckyR
November 30, 2007 3:54 PM

Yeah Ron. In terms of God's will being the Spirit's activities and combining that with what to do with politics and global issues. I tremble that I could be as blind as those christians who did not see or speak up on what Hitler was doing. I assume I am not any more commited to Christ as they were. And that I can be so blind.

On the other hand, I do think God raises up people like Martin Luther King Jr. There is lots to be argued about the man and his movement at the time, but I can imagine participating in his movement with the Spirit in me. I am old enough to have a sense of what he did in the US but not old enough to have been cognizant enough to participate in what he was doing. It is in hindsight, listening to things about him, reading things about what his movement did, and watching tv about him that I understand more of what he accomplished.

Yet I know I could be so blind as to choose to not let myself be aware and my heart pricked by what Hitler's or mini Hitlers of our day are doing. And on the one hand we do have that going on in the ethnic slaughters going on in other countries. Then I hear John what's his face's song about feeling ineffective and waiting till we can have influence - "waiting, waiting for the world to change." I feel and perhaps in reality am unable, to make a change in the big political bad things going on. I can only influence my small corner here in my world.

Dianne P
November 30, 2007 6:14 PM

Kyle #10, thank you for that exposition on Edwards. It was very helpful to me.

Two thoughts come to mind, no three. The first is that I can hardly wait to read this chapter tonight after a church group meets at our house. Hopefully this won't lead me to shoo them out so I can hunker down with this book ;-)

Second, “Constantine is not the villain; we are”. This reminds me of a powerful experience I had while reading Tozer's "Pursuit of Man". Tozer on the *self sins* was an epiphany for me, to realize that all of my sin was really about *self*. Whenever *self* creeps in, regardless of the disguise, sin is its ever-present dark shadow.

Third, a personal quest. Being raised in the Eastern Christian church, I continually yearn to better understand the theology behind the Eastern approach to the Trinity and the Spirit. I know that this was very powerful for me in my early years, and continues experientially to this day, but I don't know how to begin to wrap words around that experience. I do know it has nothing to do with the usual experience of the Spirit that is discussed/experienced in Protestant churches today - at least those in my limited circle - that largely seems limited to the Nicky Gumbel-Alpha approach to speaking in tongues etc. Not that there's anything wrong with that, just that my story has been a very different one, but I can't describe it very well. Arghhh. Whenever I can plow through a few sentences of Gregory of Nyssa, I encounter *A-ha* moments. But being one of the amateurs who are so graciously indulged on this site, my understanding of dear old Gregory is somewhat limited. So far the book by Rupnik came the closest, and I think that Work's may be headed that direction as well. I look forward to tonight!

josenmiami
December 1, 2007 10:30 AM
http://kairosrevolution.blogspot.com/

thanks for the link to Newbigin's book... Amazon.com loves me!

This is an interesting thread. One comment I would make is that the cnocept of the Kingdom of God is a very dangerous concept. I believe it is central and will be a key issue to wrestle with in the near future, but there are multiple understandings of what exactly is the kingdom of God and how it should function.

There is a Conservative Religious Right version of the kingdom of God, there is a liberal protestant concept of the kingdom of God, there is a liberationist understanding of the kingdom of God (See Gutierrez). The Reconstructionists would see the kingdom of God being implemented as a theocratic imposition of Old Testament law ... in my mind, not all that different that the Al Queda vision of Hakayaat allah and their desire to impose Sharia law. The Marxists even had their vision of the utopian kingdom (without God) that was the worker’s paradise.

We need to be really careful to distinguish what kind of kingdom Jesus had in mind. I personally like Brian McClaren’s “experiential, interactive relationship with the Holy Spirit” but as Scot pointed out, there are probably some component that McClaren’s definition fails to capture.

fjs
December 1, 2007 11:59 AM

sounds like this might be a great book to read...I'll pick it up. I have been observing the plight of immigrants in this country without documents.

A family in our town was invaded by the ICE and the mother, with child clinging to her was torn away and taken into custody for merely not having documents. (a civil offense) A family in our church also lost their daughter and grandson to Mexico when her husband (who came when he was 2) was taken into custody by the ICE and deported. (several in our church witnessed the dehumanizing cruelty of the judge who heard the case) Their lives have been turned upside down and their families have been torn apart.

Since 911, the tension has risen and I wonder what it will visibly look like to deport 12 million people. And what will be the effect on families left behind? (not to mention our relationship with Mexico) Prior to 911 there was a tacit welcome for any who needed work. Then children were born, families, settled and over the years lives were built. The immigration system we have in place was designed for another era and is not functioning with justice in mind. Yet legislation offered is being driven by fear and self interest not justice.

I am looking for biblical answers because in the post 911 fear, I see something happening in the hearts of people who say they are Christians that is unkind and unjust and ill-informed by fear of the other.

I am concerned that we don't have a solid biblical paradigm to deal ethically with this current national delimma. The bible says so much about welcoming strangers as if they were our own people... Christ himself was a refugee, many undocumented people are believers and have shared the eucharist and same waters of baptism, as christians how can we reconcile all of those texts with the current ICE behavior and our national climate toward undocumented immigrants.

There is a serious need to comprehensively examine this issue from a biblical and theological lense. It is bigger than what we see on the surface. It is bigger than making and breaking laws...there is something going on in the heart that troubles me deeply.

josenmiami
December 1, 2007 12:02 PM
http://kairosrevolution.blogspot.com/

I agree.

Dianne P
December 1, 2007 1:48 PM

#20 and 21. Suggest that you try to get this book, if only to read this chapter - Work's analysis of Jeffersonian, Jacksonian, Wilsonian, and Hamiltonian brands of Americanism and their parallels in the American Christian church(es) touch on your points in ways that seem far too complex to try to elucidate here, at least for me. Maybe someone else could take that on??? I only want to say that in Jacksonian Christianity, the tribe takes precedence over Christ. I see this happening in how we treat the stranger among us, hunkering down and raising the boundaries around our tribe.

And there was special pleasure for me, in the discussion on Trinitarian theology, to see a footnote for the beloved Gregory of Nyssa. Scot, if you're ever pondering something from the more classic realm to discuss here, I for one would certainly benefit from anything by or about St. Gregory.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Jesus Creed

Scot McKnight is a widely-recognized authority on the New Testament, early Christianity, and the historical Jesus. He is the Karl A. Olsson Professor in Religious Studies at North Park University (Chicago, Illinois). A popular and witty speaker, Dr. McKnight has given interviews on radios across the nation, has appeared on television, and is regularly asked to speak in local churches and educational events. Dr. McKnight obtained his Ph.D. at the University of Nottingham (1986). Click to continue reading Scot McKnight's Bio...

View Scot's Speaking Schedule

Contact Scot at Facebook

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Jesus Creed

Calendar



Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogroll

Daily Prayers:

Emerging Movement:

Other sites I frequent:

Recommended Online Readings:

Scholarly Books I've written:

Scholarship Online:

Stuff online:

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.