Jesus Creed

Jesus Creed

Gospel 4

posted by xscot mcknight | 12:10am Thursday September 25, 2008

A second glorious text about “gospel” in the Lukan infancy stories is found in Luke 2, but this one concerns Yeshua (Jesus) and not Yohanan (John). It is found in Luke 2:8-14.
8 And there were shepherds living out in the fields nearby, keeping watch over their flocks at night. 9 An angel of the Lord appeared to them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were terrified. 10 But the angel said to them, ?Do not be afraid. I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all the people. 11 Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is Christ the Lord. 12 This will be a sign to you: You will find a baby wrapped in cloths and lying in a manger.? 13 Suddenly a great company of the heavenly host appeared with the angel, praising God and saying,
14 ?Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace to men on whom his favor rests.?
1. This is a gospel for “all the people” — maybe Gentiles, but probably a reference to Israelites.
2. This gospel is a cause for great joy.
3. This gospel is something declared.
4. This gospel’s content is that Jesus is Savior — that Jesus is Messiah — that Jesus is Lord. Hence, the gospel involves the declaration that Jesus is Savior, Messiah, and Lord.
5. This Savior, Messiah, Lord is at the time of the angelic declaration a baby.
6. This gospel is cosmically significant.
7. This gospel involves “peace on earth for those upon whom God’s favor rests.” (Hence, an implicit ecclesial body is at work.)



Previous Posts

This blog is no longer active
This blog is no longer being actively updated. Please feel free to browse the archives or: Read our most popular inspiration blog See our most popular inspirational video Take our most popular quiz

posted 3:10:39pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Our Common Prayerbook 30 - 3
Psalm 30 thanks God (vv. 1-3, 11-12) and exhorts others to thank God (vv. 4-5). Both emerge from the concrete reality of David's own experience. Here is what that experience looks like:Step one: David was set on high and was flourishing at the hand of God's bounty (v. 7a).Step two: David became too

posted 12:15:30pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Theology After Darwin 1 (RJS)
One of the more important and more difficult pieces of the puzzle as we feel our way forward at the interface of science and faith is the theological implications of discoveries in modern science. A comment on my post Evolution in the Key of D: Deity or Deism noted: ...this reminds me of why I get a

posted 6:01:52am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Almost Christian 4
Who does well when it comes to passing on the faith to the youth? Studies show two groups do really well: conservative Protestants and Mormons; two groups that don't do well are mainline Protestants and Roman Catholics. Kenda Dean's new book is called Almost Christian: What the Faith of Ou

posted 12:01:53am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Let's Get Neanderthal!
The Cave Man Diet, or Paleo Diet, is getting attention. (Nothing is said about Culver's at all.) The big omission, I have to admit, is that those folks were hunters -- using spears or smacking some rabbit upside the conk or grabbing a fish or two with their hands ... but that's what makes this diet

posted 2:05:48pm Aug. 30, 2010 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(12)
post a comment
RJS

posted September 25, 2008 at 8:13 am


Scot,
I like # 6 – cosmically significant, but would like clarification on #7.
The text says: on earth peace to men on whom his favor rests.
You take this to mean an ecclesial body, i.e. peace to(men on whom his favor rests) which is not necessarily the entire body of mankind.
When I read the passage I thought (peace to men)on whom his favor rests, — meaning peace to all mankind, with an added clause that this peace is because of God’s favor. This is not directly an ecclesial reading or implying an ecclesial body.
Why is one reading preferred over the other?



report abuse
 

Dana Ames

posted September 25, 2008 at 11:15 am


Good post, Scot, and good question, RJS.
Dana



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted September 25, 2008 at 11:21 am


RJS,
The grammar isn’t one of certainty. But, this is clear:
“for those” is modified by “God’s favor.” It seems more natural to read this as “on earth… peace … among those upon whom the favor of God — in the Messiah — rests.”
Had the meaning been universal peace, it would have been easier to stop with “peace on earth” (which is what most Christmas cards do).



report abuse
 

Travis Greene

posted September 25, 2008 at 1:40 pm


I like how angels are always having to tell people to calm down and stop being terrified before they can get on with their mission.
Hey, maybe that’s good advice for us too. If you went up to most people and said, “Hey, would you like to talk about Jesus?” they’d be as terrified as the shepherds. So the first step to declaring the good news of Jesus is addressing fear of condemnation, manipulation, and guilt.



report abuse
 

John Frye

posted September 25, 2008 at 3:34 pm


Scot,
I am intrigued by your parsing of “peace on earth on those on whom his favor rests.” I am thinking about it. Good stuff!
Also I like your JESUS CREED video clip. Way to go!! :)



report abuse
 

T

posted September 25, 2008 at 3:49 pm


Also, Scot (or anyone), does “Savior” have a specific content here or does it simply mean “rescuer”, colored, in this context, by Israel’s story and the prophets? What I mean is, many today hear “Savior” and automatically plug in “save us from eternal damnation.” The term itself does not call for that at all, does it? (Even if other passages make that clear?) I’m just wanting to let the texts tell me clearly about ‘gospel’ and ‘savior’ rather than assume I know what those terms are saying.



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted September 25, 2008 at 6:23 pm


T,
Savior here means the one who will rescue Israel from its (national/personal) sins. But, it is very close to “Messiah” and “messianic deliverer” and “liberator.” The key here is to read Magnificat, Benedictus, Nunc Dimittis, and John’s own preaching … these clarify the meaning of “Savior.”



report abuse
 

Nicholas K.

posted September 25, 2008 at 11:36 pm


Scot,
How about gospel as subversive to the imperial powers that be (i.e. the good of Jesus rather than Caesar)? I know empire is currently a hot topic within Pauline studies but I’m wondering what profit you might see (if any) in considering empire ideology as a relevant backdrop for Luke?



report abuse
 

Nicholas K.

posted September 25, 2008 at 11:37 pm


gospel of Jesus not good of Jesus… though Jesus is good…sorry.



report abuse
 

Anonymous

posted September 26, 2008 at 6:06 pm


A Question of Gospel. | Christian Opinion

[...] Thank you Jesus creed for inspiring this post. [...]



report abuse
 

Georges Boujakly

posted September 26, 2008 at 8:46 pm


Scot,
Could this be added to your list of 7?
The gospel is the glory of God on earth in Christ Jesus.



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted September 26, 2008 at 9:02 pm


Georges,
Certainly.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.