Jesus Creed

Jesus Creed

Gospel 35

posted by Jesus Creed Admin | 12:00am Wednesday November 19, 2008

We are looking at the meaning of “gospel” in 1 Corinthians. What does Paul mean by the word “gospel”? If we want to be faithful to the Story of the Bible it means being faithful to the whole Story of the Bible. Too many today want to be faithful to Jesus’ use of the word “gospel” and ignore Paul; too many also want to be faithful to Paul but ignore what Jesus said. Our hope is to frame the gospel in such a  way that is faithful to both — and the rest of the Bible too. So today we are looking at 1 Corithians 9:11-23:

11 If we have sown spiritual seed among you, is it too much if we reap a material harvest from you? 12 If others have this right of support from you, shouldn’t we have it all the more? But we did not use this right. On the contrary, we put up with anything rather than hinder the gospel of Christ. 13 Don’t
you know that those who work in the temple get their food from the
temple, and those who serve at the altar share in what is offered on
the altar? 14 In the same way, the Lord has commanded that those who preach the gospel should receive their living from the gospel.

15 But
I have not used any of these rights. And I am not writing this in the
hope that you will do such things for me. I would rather die than have
anyone deprive me of this boast. 16 Yet when I preach the gospel, I cannot boast, for I am compelled to preach. Woe to me if I do not preach the gospel! 17 If I preach voluntarily, I have a reward; if not voluntarily, I am simply discharging the trust committed to me. 18 What
then is my reward? Just this: that in preaching the gospel I may offer
it free of charge, and so not make use of my rights in preaching it.

19 Though I am free and belong to no man, I make myself a slave to everyone, to win as many as possible. 20 To
the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I
became like one under the law (though I myself am not under the law),
so as to win those under the law. 21 To
those not having the law I became like one not having the law (though I
am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law), so as to win
those not having the law. 22 To
the weak I became weak, to win the weak. I have become all things to
all men so that by all possible means I might save some. 23 I do all this for the sake of the gospel, that I may share in its blessings.

Paul preached the gospel free of charge. It is not clear from this text that he always preached free of charge. Instead, Paul chose against what he knew was within his rights — to be paid — to avoid being trapped into a relationship of indebtedness that might hamper his gospeling.

This cannot be taken as the norm: Paul says those who preach the gospel are entitled to live from the gospel. It would not hard here to venture into reflections on (1) the need for churches to pay their “gospelers” and (2) the need for gospelers to avoid the appearance of wanting more money.

Paul preached the gospel as a burden — as a necessity; it was in his bones to preach the gospel.

Now a point — vv. 19-23 — that is the constant need of gospeler: to adapt and adopt the gospel to the context of one’s audience. This does not mean not preaching the cross and the resurrection of Christ but it means to speak the gospel into each context with clarity and relevance. Paul adapted himself to each context: Jewish and Gentile. Why? To win others into faith in Christ.



Previous Posts

This blog is no longer active
This blog is no longer being actively updated. Please feel free to browse the archives or: Read our most popular inspiration blog See our most popular inspirational video Take our most popular quiz

posted 3:10:39pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Our Common Prayerbook 30 - 3
Psalm 30 thanks God (vv. 1-3, 11-12) and exhorts others to thank God (vv. 4-5). Both emerge from the concrete reality of David's own experience. Here is what that experience looks like:Step one: David was set on high and was flourishing at the hand of God's bounty (v. 7a).Step two: David became too

posted 12:15:30pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Theology After Darwin 1 (RJS)
One of the more important and more difficult pieces of the puzzle as we feel our way forward at the interface of science and faith is the theological implications of discoveries in modern science. A comment on my post Evolution in the Key of D: Deity or Deism noted: ...this reminds me of why I get a

posted 6:01:52am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Almost Christian 4
Who does well when it comes to passing on the faith to the youth? Studies show two groups do really well: conservative Protestants and Mormons; two groups that don't do well are mainline Protestants and Roman Catholics. Kenda Dean's new book is called Almost Christian: What the Faith of Ou

posted 12:01:53am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Let's Get Neanderthal!
The Cave Man Diet, or Paleo Diet, is getting attention. (Nothing is said about Culver's at all.) The big omission, I have to admit, is that those folks were hunters -- using spears or smacking some rabbit upside the conk or grabbing a fish or two with their hands ... but that's what makes this diet

posted 2:05:48pm Aug. 30, 2010 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(7)
post a comment
RJS

posted November 19, 2008 at 8:21 am


From this passage the gospel is something to be preached – but the text provides very little insight into the content of the gospel to be preached. Of course vv19-23 are critical, not for understanding the content of the gospel – but for eliminating some things from that content – things of culture and status and form. Interesting.



report abuse
 

John W Frye

posted November 19, 2008 at 10:48 am


Scot,
I don’t want to ride a dead horse, but in line with my comment on yesterday’s text, isn’t Paul’s general refusal of financial support and his creative adaptation to cultural context an argument that “his teachings” aligned with his life (1 Cor. 4:16-17)? As RJS mentions above, we have little of the content specifically mentioned, but lot about Paul’s way of preaching.



report abuse
 

Darren King

posted November 19, 2008 at 10:51 am


I would actually question whether we need to give the Pauline understanding of the gospel the same weight as that which we would ascribe to Jesus. Who says this should be so? A one-size-fits-all notion of sola scriptura? In my mind, we should remember that Paul was Jesus’ follower, not primarily his interpreter.



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted November 19, 2008 at 11:12 am


John,
I’ve been swamped and not had lots of time for commenting back. Yes, I think Paul does think his life backs up his teachings and embodies his teachings.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted November 19, 2008 at 4:56 pm


Darren’s comment seems to be appropriate. For some reason, it appears that many churhes and pastors get their theology from Paul and their “warm fuzzies” from Christ. I suspect that is not true for the Jesus Creed crew, but it does seem an accurate assesment for many of the churches I’ve attended.____In my ignorance, for it may have already been addressed, I would ask Scot if he feels Paul is primarily an “interpreter of Christ” and therefore gives more credence to that particular form of “gospel”?____



report abuse
 

Chris E

posted November 21, 2008 at 9:03 am


The question that arises most strongly in my mind when I read chapter 9 is why there are not more gospelers who do not derive their living from the church. Paul’s method here is very powrful. He builds a strong case for vocational gospeling and then juxtaposes his way of life (at least amongst the Corinthians) with that. Why don’t we see more men and women willing, yea compelled, to gospel apart from a paycheck from the church?



report abuse
 

Bryon

posted November 25, 2008 at 2:36 pm


The intro to this is probably the most important statement I’ve read in this conversation. As I’m studying and learning and growing I’m noticing this tension more and more. People are arguing for one or the other Paul or Jesus. Yet, if all of Scripture is “God-breathed,” then all the statements ultimately come from the same source. We need to see more people looking to understand Scripture as a whole rather than picking the passages that support their presuppositions. Anyone have any recommendations for authors that are doing this well?



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.