Our point today is this: acedia is not just the lack of care by an individual; there is a culture-wide acedia at work today. I wonder if you've thought about "lack of care" as a cultural issue. Where are you seeing it? [By the way, our next book will be Andrew Hamilton,
Seeing Gray in a World of Black and White: Thoughts on Religion, Morality, and Politics.]
Now to Norris and Schaeffer.
Schaeffer's life, according to Hankins, can (and he refuses to be simplistic here) be traced in three big periods: the fundamentalism days of his seminary and early pastoring, the European days when he expanded his ideas into a broader evangelicalism concerned with understanding and responding to culture, and then his return to the USA where he entered into the fray of being the intellectual force behind what became the Moral Majority. And Hankins records some fascinating correspondence (and disagreement) of Schaeffer with a young Mark Noll and George Marsden.
But it is that European cultural criticism of Schaeffer, where he was at his best, even if he often lacked nuance, that concerns the themes of Kathleen Norris. Schaeffer found a culture and Western world that had shut itself off from grace by becoming absorbed with nature, and it led to his famous line: there is "death in the city." Schaeffer also challenged thousands -- many of them future leaders and thinkers -- to take up the task of cultural criticism with theological vigor and confidence.
What Schaeffer calls "death in the city" Norris sees as cultural acedia. Notice these words of hers, which struck me as the same point Schaeffer was making: "Whenever we focus on the foibles of celebrities to the detriment of learning more about the real world -- the emergence of fundamentalist religious and nationalist movements, the economic factors endangering our reefs and rain forests, the social and ecological damage caused by factory farming -- acedia is at work" (130). This is not about being busy: "workaholic habits ... erode the spirit" (123). It is this capacity to penetrate into the very fabric of society that drove Schaeffer.
Norris quotes Alasdair MacIntyre with words that profoundly make our point: "It is clear that we lack an adequate concept of evil ... because we lack any adequate concept of good" (126). "Indeed!," Schaeffer might have said.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon












I was at a random book store today, and saw "Acedia & Me". I thought about picking it up, but it was 11 dollars.
That 11 dollars went towards a bus pass and groceries.
....and im still saving for 'The Mission of God'
We lack an adequate concept of good because we lack adequate knowledge of God. Our view of God works through our thinking to the decisions we make. How well we know Him colors our view of the world around us. The more deeply I know Him the more I understand what good is, the more I understand what good is, the more distinct evil will be.
This could be part of the reason behind the admonitions in Jeremiah 9:23-24, Hosea 4;6, 6:3,6, and II Peter 1:2-3, 3;18.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.