Jesus Creed

Not what the Psalmist had in mind...

Sunday January 11, 2009

Ps 104:32: "May the glory of the LORD endure for ever;* may the LORD rejoice in all his works. He looks at the earth and it trembles;* he touches the mountains and they smoke." A picture of a strike in...
Advertisement
Comments
RJS
January 11, 2009 6:39 PM

Well Scot,

The conflict in Israel/Palestine is terrible.

But I am not so sure that the Psalmist would agree with your title - if you read down a couple of verses.

Scot McKnight
January 11, 2009 7:09 PM

The one without sin can toss the first stone.

Margot
January 11, 2009 7:12 PM

another family feud

ChrisB
January 11, 2009 7:29 PM

"The one without sin can toss the first stone."

How about the one who doesn't intentionally target civilians on a daily basis?

Colin
January 12, 2009 4:11 AM
http://stormface.wordpress.com

ChrisB, is intentionality the only important factor? I don't know that you can target a Hamas leader's home in a civilian neighborhood without some knowledge that you will in fact kill the rest of his family and some of his neighbors. Does this somehow constitute an exception to your requirement of intentionality?

Today in church (a Covenant church, Scot) there was a guest speaker, a minister to missionaries, that kept talking about how Jesus can drive out all the devils in Gaza. He said it over and over, he prayed it even, "Jesus, drive out the devils in Gaza." I couldn't help but wonder why he didn't ask God to drive out the "devils" in Israel as well. He never even used the name "Hamas," just "devils in Gaza," and he spent a good deal of time warning us against saying "'those people' over there are..." when in truth his rhetoric did not reflect this message. I think this is a topic that requires very careful wording.

Why didn't he ask the pertinent but oft-neglected question about why the "devils" are there in the first place, and why they are so angry? I'll say it one more time in a different way: What part of the violence against Israel is systemic and what part is subjective? And why is Israel off-limits for this sort of analysis for fear of being branded anti-semitic?

James Petticrew
January 12, 2009 4:24 AM

I have no love for Hamas and I utterly condemn and deplore what they are doing. However Israel has also targeted civilians, the on going blockade of Gaza has driven civilians into unemployment, near starvation and the lack of medical supplies has undoubtedly led to avoidable deaths. This has led to a despair that has driven some in Gaza to join Hamas and others to at least passively support them. Palestinian Christians have been among those who have had land taken from them with no compensation for Israel's defensive wall or had their homes bulldozed in reprisals. I can't fit either Hamas's actions or those of Israel with the vision of justice held by the OT prophets or the Jesus' Way of the Sermon on the Mount.
I want to call for justice for both sides in this conflict and side with neither.

Derek Leman
January 12, 2009 10:02 AM
http://derek4messiah.wordpress.com

derek4messiah.wordpress.com

Israel is fallible and human as we all are. Yet, what can a nation do with neighbors determined to keep killing them? Criticizing is easier than finding alternatives. But if anyone has alternatives to suggest, I'd be interested. Just make sure the alternative you suggest is realistic -- as if the missiles were aimed at your homes and public schools.

Scot McKnight
January 12, 2009 10:07 AM

Derek, I grieve too ... not just for Israel but also for the Palestinians.

In my judgment, you've defined me out of the options by using the word "realistic." I'm not a political realist; I'm an anabaptist.

My pragmatic point: the realist options that have been used since the 60s have proven themselves inordinately unrealistic and unncessarily violent. The only solution, apart from embracing the way of Jesus, is for these two peoples (1) to commit to nonviolence and (2) sit at the table and compromise for peace.

RJS
January 12, 2009 10:15 AM

As an individual it is easy to be an anabaptist rather than a political realist. As a nation or a national leader - is it really? For example - should Obama take a realist or an idealist approach to US defense? Where do we draw the line?

Personally I think that Bush drew the wrong line - but I don't think that radical nonviolence and pacifist idealism would have been the right line.

Israel is a complex situation - and I always have mixed feelings as I have many friends who are living, working, and raising families there.

Your Name
January 12, 2009 10:21 AM

Colin,

Israel targets neighborhoods because that's where Hamas stores/fires its missiles. If it is physically impossible to defend yourself without firing into neighborhoods, what do you do?

James,

Remember that Israel and Hamas/Fatah/Gaza signed a cease-fire which Hamas has ignored. The blockade will cease when the missiles cease.

Scot,

Unless you want the Israelis to just sit there and die, this will continue until the Palestinians get tired of watching their children die.

Derek Leman
January 12, 2009 9:16 PM
http://derek4messiah.wordpress.com

Scot:

Israel will commit for long periods of time to peace and militant Islamists will not.

Is non-violent resistance the only answer you can affirm?

It worked for MLK because there was a population with a conscience who eventually awoke.

It would not have worked in WWII and it would not work in Israel.

Derek

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Jesus Creed

Scot McKnight is a widely-recognized authority on the New Testament, early Christianity, and the historical Jesus. He is the Karl A. Olsson Professor in Religious Studies at North Park University (Chicago, Illinois). A popular and witty speaker, Dr. McKnight has given interviews on radios across the nation, has appeared on television, and is regularly asked to speak in local churches and educational events. Dr. McKnight obtained his Ph.D. at the University of Nottingham (1986). Click to continue reading Scot McKnight's Bio...

View Scot's Speaking Schedule

Contact Scot at Facebook

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Jesus Creed

Calendar



Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogroll

Daily Prayers:

Emerging Movement:

Other sites I frequent:

Recommended Online Readings:

Scholarly Books I've written:

Scholarship Online:

Stuff online:

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.