Jesus Creed

Jesus Creed

A Brother’s Wisdom 47

posted by Scot McKnight | 1:08pm Wednesday May 6, 2009

Prayer.jpgJames 2:14-17 probes deeply into those who see needs (or ignore needs) and do nothing to alleviate needs. James, in fact, says that kind of response indicates the lack of faith — the lack of saving faith. Notice his words:

14 What good is it, my brothers, if a man claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save him? 15 Suppose a brother or sister is without clothes and daily food. 16 If
one of you says to him, “Go, I wish you well; keep warm and well fed,”
but does nothing about his physical needs, what good is it?
17 In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead.

The language of James 2:16, while it can be generalized or taken in a less concrete sense, may well indicate “praying” for those in need but not giving to those in need. The language is passive voice stuff: “Go in peace” may be “May God’s peace be upon you,” and “keep warm” may be “may God keep you warm” and “keep … well fed” may be “may God feed you.” This could represent language that intends to show the prayer turning his or her face away from the needs and asking God to take care of the problems.

What good is it?, James asks, if this person does nothing about it.

His answer, implicitly, is: “It is of no good.” In other words, those who see needs (or ignore needs) and do nothing about it, do not have the kind of faith that is consistent with Jesus, the Glorious One.



Previous Posts

This blog is no longer active
This blog is no longer being actively updated. Please feel free to browse the archives or: Read our most popular inspiration blog See our most popular inspirational video Take our most popular quiz

posted 3:10:39pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Our Common Prayerbook 30 - 3
Psalm 30 thanks God (vv. 1-3, 11-12) and exhorts others to thank God (vv. 4-5). Both emerge from the concrete reality of David's own experience. Here is what that experience looks like:Step one: David was set on high and was flourishing at the hand of God's bounty (v. 7a).Step two: David became too

posted 12:15:30pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Theology After Darwin 1 (RJS)
One of the more important and more difficult pieces of the puzzle as we feel our way forward at the interface of science and faith is the theological implications of discoveries in modern science. A comment on my post Evolution in the Key of D: Deity or Deism noted: ...this reminds me of why I get a

posted 6:01:52am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Almost Christian 4
Who does well when it comes to passing on the faith to the youth? Studies show two groups do really well: conservative Protestants and Mormons; two groups that don't do well are mainline Protestants and Roman Catholics. Kenda Dean's new book is called Almost Christian: What the Faith of Ou

posted 12:01:53am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Let's Get Neanderthal!
The Cave Man Diet, or Paleo Diet, is getting attention. (Nothing is said about Culver's at all.) The big omission, I have to admit, is that those folks were hunters -- using spears or smacking some rabbit upside the conk or grabbing a fish or two with their hands ... but that's what makes this diet

posted 2:05:48pm Aug. 30, 2010 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(4)
post a comment
RJS

posted May 6, 2009 at 1:37 pm


Scot, this is a powerful passage – and I agree with everything you say about it (so far anyway). But … clearly the implication in this passage is that at least some members of James audience are “rich,” at least rich enough to give to the poor and hungry and naked and thirsty without becoming poor, hungry, naked, or thirsty themselves. And I think the assumption could be made that they were failing to live out the teachings of Jesus at times – or James wouldn’t need to write as he does. (Perhaps you disagree?)
Why do you think that this is true here – but is not true in Ch. 1? All of your discussion in Ch. 1 put the rich in the category of the “unfaithful them” in opposition to James’s faithful poverty stricken messianic audience.



report abuse
 

Joseph

posted May 6, 2009 at 1:47 pm


It makes me wonder how much better off our nation, and Christianity itself, would be if James had as many books as Paul in the canon.



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted May 6, 2009 at 1:55 pm


RJS, fair enough. I wouldn’t classify these folks as rich, but instead they are folks having enough to help others. Whenever James uses the word “rich” he snarls … so I think.



report abuse
 

bob

posted May 7, 2009 at 5:53 am


I am struck by “faith” in this passage. If faith is simply “trusting in the work of Jesus on the cross for my righteousness”, which is the summary definition I hear Sunday after Sunday, then the kind of response James is talking about seems odd, as though he is completely missing the point. If I am trusting in Jesus, why would I have to do anything else to validate or demonstrate my faith?
Perhaps this classic Protestant summary has simplified things too much? Is faith something bigger than this? This is curious.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.