No one knows for sure why James moves to Rahab as his second example, though some suggestions are clever. Hospitality seems the best explanation: the messanists for not showing it to the poor, Abraham for entertaining strangers, and Rahab for welcoming Israel's spies. The Canaanite prostitute Rahab, whose story of hospitality is told in Joshua 2 and whose reward is found in 6:16-25, creates problems for modern interpreters and historians while she resolves a faith-works relationship for James. The writer of Hebrews also saw Rahab as an example of faith and hospitality (11:31), while Matthew seems to depict her as a sinful Gentile woman who played a role in the Messiah's geneaology (1:5). Josephus makes her an inn-keeper instead of a prostitute and therefore the spies are only there for dinner (Ant 5.7-15). In 1 Clement 12 we discover a prophetic type of atonement in the red cord and in later Judaism Rahab was classified as a proselyte but this isn't James' point. For James, Rahab was (1) a prostitute, (2) justified by works, and (3) one who welcomed the spies and sent them off surreptitiously.
For James, she illustrates that faith accompanied by deeds of mercy (works) is the kind of faith that works/saves.
James closes the sub-text (2:24-26), the unit (2:20-26), and the entire chp with this conclusion: "As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead." That's been his point all along and it's his intent. If read within that point and with that intent, James should make sense for Protestants.
Faith and works are inseparable for James.
Add to Del.icio.us
Add to Technorati
Add to Digg
Add to Newsvine
Add to Facebook
Add to StumbleUpon
Subscribe
Scot said: "Hospitality seems the best explanation: the messanists for not showing it to the poor, Abraham for entertaining strangers, and Rahab for welcoming Israel's spies."
I can see the argument, but I'm not convinced for the simple reason that his mention of Abraham is not entertaining strangers but being willing to kill his son.
In helping the spies, Rahab essentially committed treason, and she would probably have been put to death if she was caught. That's a big step above showing hospitality.
I think the better explanation is that they both demonstrate a radical committment to what they believe. If we're not equally ready to live out what we believe, we have to ask whether we really believe it.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.