In the 5th chp of NT Wright's new book, Justification: God's Plan & Paul's Vision
, Wright explains the significance of Abraham in the middle of Galatians. Three issues emerge in chps three and four, and it gets to the heart of Tom Wright's proposal within the new perspective -- and it is not a denial of personal salvation but a placing of personal salvation within the context of what God is doing in history -- and that dimension is too often ignored in the old perspective and another context is given -- God's plan for personal salvation is what drives that reading of Scripture. Here are the three major themes for Galatians 3-4:1. The covenant and promise to Abraham.
2. The Law
3. The Messiah
The the point of the section is to show how the Law fits into all of this: "it gets in the way of the promise to Abraham" (123). How? It chokes the promise within Israel's failure, it threatens to divide the family of God, and it locks up everything in the prison house of sin. God thereby makes his purposes clear: to carry on the single plan with Israel (and Abraham) on the basis of faith and the Torah makes that faith-response the clear implication of the whole plan. Even the curse passage (3:10-14) is connected -- not to human sin -- but to the inclusion of Gentiles in Abraham's blessing and that we might receive this promise on the basis of faith.
Here it is:
"Scripture has concluded everything under sin, so that the promise, on the basis of the faithfulness of Jesus the Messiah, might be given to those who believe. God's single-plan-through-Israel -for the-world has turned, as God always intended, into God's-single-plan- through-the-faithful-Israelite for-the-world-now-including-Israel-too." (I have made this all italics and split some words up to spread it out.)
The NT Wright version of the new perspective is all right here: the theology of Paul is about how God's covenant with Abraham to bless the world has found its fulfillment in Jesus Christ and this history of Israel focus is more central than the how do I get myself saved? focus of the older perspective.
Sin and God's plan through Abraham to bless the world are connected tightly in Paul's argument. Torah can only be understood within this plan for history context for Paul, instead of simply within the personal salvation issue. God designed the Torah to keep Israel in check.
The NT Wright version of the new perspective is all right here: the theology of Paul is about how God's covenant with Abraham to bless the world has found its fulfillment in Jesus Christ and this history of Israel focus is more central than the how do I get myself saved? focus of the older perspective.
Sin and God's plan through Abraham to bless the world are connected tightly in Paul's argument. Torah can only be understood within this plan for history context for Paul, instead of simply within the personal salvation issue. God designed the Torah to keep Israel in check.
Add to Del.icio.us
Add to Technorati
Add to Digg
Add to Newsvine
Add to Facebook
Add to StumbleUpon
Subscribe
Who's down with OPP?
Joy (14)
That's awesome.
John (#7, #12)
Wright claims to be reading Gal 2:15-21 in the context of Peter's behaviour Gal 2.11-14, and so argues everything must have no other reference than that. In other places where Paul addresses problems in congregations, Wright says Paul laudably goes back to first principles to explain things. I think the same applies here, and Gal 2:15-21 is a first principles argument against Peter. I think Wright's exegesis fails on the points I make in #2. What about the point I make about Gal 2.19? As for Gal 2.21, I find it very strange to say that is either about lack of graciousness or is a cry of freedom, it makes no communicational sense to me for such a wording to be saying that. So, I think Gal 2.15-21 is about sin, not about markers.
I appreciate everyone's responses, but in which NPP book will I find that spelled out?
I am not a NPP advocate, but this quote of Wright's really says nothing new nor adds anything to a position held by, say, John Calvin. All (confessing) Reformed Christians would agree that "the theology of Paul is about how God's covenant with Abraham to bless the world has found its fulfillment in Jesus Christ." This is perhaps THE very tenet of Reformed theology: The unity of the covenant of grace (New covenant is part of the Abrahamic) and Christ's federal covenant headship (fulfillment of the Law in Christ).
What is nearly impossible to read, however, is that personal/human sin is not included in Galatians 3:10-14. ("Even the curse passage (3:10-14) is connected -- not to human sin -- but to the inclusion of Gentiles in Abraham's blessing and that we might receive this promise on the basis of faith.")
Who experiences "the curse of the law" if not sinners under God's wrath? The "curse of the law" is not that promise would not come by it, but rather through faith. This is clear because Paul immediately clarifies the curse of the law which Christ bore: death on a cross/tree. Paul includes himself and all believing Jews in this by means of the inclusive "became a curse for US" as separate from mention of the Gentiles.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.