John answered, "Anyone who has two shirts should share with the one who has none, and anyone who has food should do the same."
Even tax collectors came to be baptized. "Teacher," they asked, "what should we do?" "Don't collect any more than you are required to," he told them.
Then some soldiers asked him, "And what should we do?" He replied, "Don't extort money and don't accuse people falsely--be content with your pay."
What was the problem according to John? If Kingdom is the answer, what is the problem?
Here it is again: the solution is a spiritual and social resolution to a spiritual and social problem. Israelites had turned at one another's throats and John calls them to care for one another, to live in a community the way God wants them to live. Repentance is more than feeling bad about your sins, though it involves that. For John, repentance looks real: sharing extra possessions to take care of those in need, collecting a just tax, and ending the abusive use of power. When we talk about repentance today - the kind of repentance that leads to baptisms - the kind of repentance that leads to salvation, do we say "share your possessions, don't extort, be satisfied with your pay?" or do we have other things in mind? I think we will nearly all admit that we have other things in mind.
I wonder more and more how much damage the little gospel we have been preaching is doing to the church. And I dream of the day when the gospel we preach is as big as the Bible's Story. We have only sketched Mary and John, and we have not yet gotten to Jesus, but if we stop right now we get this: If kingdom is the solution, the problem it resolved was comprehensive injustice - before God, before the self, before others, and therefore with the world. Some may be tempted to tame these passages by suggesting they are pre-Jesus or pre-Cross or pre-Pentecost. Luke's wiki-story, though, will keep this blue parakeet alive from the days of Mary to the days of the early Jerusalem community of faith.
Jesus preaching kingdom
I'll get to Jesus tomorrow. I set that up with this story: As a freshly minted high school convert my youth pastor asked me to do a talk at our youth meeting during our weekly Wednesday prayer meeting. I prayed and prepared and preached about a text that was perhaps the most significant text in my Bible at the time: "Be ye separate." The text was from 2 Corinthians 6:17 where we discover that the text is actually a quotation from Isaiah 52:11 with a considerably different meaning than what I wanted to bring up. That didn't matter to me because I was standing on a firm, fundamentalist foundation called "the doctrine of separation." That doctrine was a puzzle I inherited and it gave me what I thought I should say. My exhortation was entirely wrapped up in urging my fellow youth members to avoid alcohol and marijuana and other evil temptations like dancing, dating Roman Catholics, liberals and Lutherans, and attending Hollywood movies. We were dead-set against dancing because it was reported that it led to premarital sex. We weren't sure if it did since we didn't dance ... but the rumors were rampant. I'm no more ashamed of what I said then than I am proud of it now. It's the way I was; it was what I knew.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon












Loving this discussion on the "Kingdom Gospel." Your emphasis on the gospel involving a creation of and membership within a Jesus-shaped community reminds me of many of the writings of Stanely Hauerwas and the church.
Does Hauerwas capture the "Kingdom Gospel" you are presenting? Peace.
Wow, you got me all curious about tomorrow's post by introducing Jesus preaching kingdom with your fundamentalist "doctrine of separation" preaching story.....
On a side note check out this website "stuff fundies like." http://www.stufffundieslike.com/2009/04/sanctified-and-seperated-seclusion/
Its humor is quite therapeutic for the recovering fundamentalist such as myself......
Loving this series. Really loving it. I think the question 'what is the gospel?' (and the other way of asking it, 'what is salvation in Christ?') is the single most important question the church needs to answer. We need a recovery of the full gospel that takes seriously all the things being emphasized in this thread. Looking forward to the rest of it!
I read John's words and see a salvation that comes only through praxis, actually doing good. Something quite different from what the foundational ideas laid down by Paul.
The doctrine of separation also splits along Paul/Gospel lines. I found Marcus Borg/John Dominic Crossan's book "The First Paul" really gets down to the core of this issue.
Scot,
I appreciate this series as I have the Kingdom study of years past. I have been sharing the "kingdom" conversation with a group of guys from predominantly fundamentalist backgroups. I enjoy seeing the lights go on as they start to "get it", when they aren't fighting it. Keep it coming.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.