Advertisement
Scot McKnight is a widely-recognized authority on the New Testament, early Christianity, and the historical Jesus. He is the Karl A. Olsson Professor in Religious Studies at North Park University (Chicago, Illinois). A popular and witty speaker, Dr. McKnight has given interviews on radios across the nation, has appeared on television, and is regularly asked to speak in local churches and educational events. Dr. McKnight obtained his Ph.D. at the University of Nottingham (1986). Click to continue reading Scot McKnight's Bio...
Daily Prayers:
Emerging Movement:
Other sites I frequent:
Recommended Online Readings:
Scholarly Books I've written:
Scholarship Online:
Stuff online:
Thanks for this "Pastor's Bookshelf" series. I buy as many books as I can on recommendation, and this is really helpful.
Just thought I'd mention how much I've benefited from Thiselton's Shorter commentary on 1 Corinthians. It's dense, lucid, and incisive.
Scot,
Am I reading this correctly: "1 Corinthians doesn't have as many good commentaries as does 2 Corinthians"? I have always felt the opposite.
I would add to your list Richard Hays commentary in the Interpretation Series. It provides an excellent overview for students and pastors alike. I used it this year in my 1 Corinthians class and found it to be the best choice ever. It is a great read for people who want to go deeper, but need a guide who does not assume too much on the reader. Also, you can purchase a companion guide by Bruce Fisk that is very helpful for leading a small group.
I agree with John Byron that Hays' commentary ought to be on the list. It is surprisingly dense - without being inaccessible - for a volume in that series.
I would agree with the previous comments, Hays is solid. To that I would add the recent commentary by Fitzmyer in the Anchor Bible Series, as well as Thiselton. I'd be interested to hear why Thiselton wasn't included on the list...
Scot
I agree with your first destination being Gordon Fee. I have been using that A LOT recently! It takes some time to walk through it...but I think he does a good job balancing perspectives and walking a solid middle line.
I had the privilege of being at Gordon-Conwell and taking classes from Gordon Fee as he was doing the research for the commentary.
It is one of those "extra perks" that students and their prof have a special experience when the prof is working through and writing what becomes one of the standard texts in a field and teaching out of that material real time.
It also makes it a real pain to write an exegesis paper . . .
:-)
brian
Scot,
I, too, agree with your selection of FEE at the top of the list. As for the other comments, I will have to get Hays' work.
I must admit I am a bit shocked to see Thiselton's NIGTC commentary is not included.
I always start with Thiselton. Next I will be turning to Fitzmyer's new AB commentary. I also consult Conzelman's Hermeneia volume. I do tend to consult Witherington's socio-rhetorical commentary for any project involving rhetoric, but I must admit I usually come away disappointed.
I have used Fee again and again. A wonderful resource!
I would add Craig Blomberg's 1 Corinthians volume from the NIVAC series. Not a huge fan of the NIVAC format, but Blomberg's exegesis and critical thinking is always solid.
Scot,
How could you leave off Thiselton!
Yes, Fee and Witherington, and wish I had the others.
yeah I'm with my friend Jason: what gives with the Thiselton no show?
-jeremy
What about Raymond Collins in the Sacra Pagina series? It's not often that a Catholic commentary gets an imprimatur from D.A. Carson!
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.