I don't see Michael Gorman's outstanding work on Paul cited enough; and therefore not enough are interacting with him. I say this because Gorman has become one of the most fruitful, irenic, and astute theologians of Paul in the contemporary scene. Somehow he seems to have found a Third Way beyond current impasses, and his most recent book, Inhabiting the Cruciform God: Kenosis, Justification, and Theosis in Paul's Narrative SoteriologyThis book ties together Paul's ideas about justification and holiness and co-crucifixion (with Christ) into the rich and ever-growing notion of theosis -- our being made like God. In some ways, Gorman draws together the Catholic, the Protestant and the Eastern Orthdoox.
Here is the dynamic idea at work in this exceptional book: God became human -- kenosis -- and the supreme revelation is the cross. Therefore, God is cruciform. We are called to participate in that revelation. This is dense, but read it slowly and you will gain a new appreciation of the depth of Paul's theology and the centrality of cross for everything: "Theosis is transformative participation in the kenotic, cruciform character of God through Spirit-enabled conformity to the incarnate, crucified, and resurrected/glorified Christ." This means to be truly human is to be Christlike, which is to be Godlike, which is to be kenotic and cruciform. That is heavy and that is rich theology.
This big perspective, which can be seen as an incarnational and cruciform theology, also means justification is about participation in relational and covenantal terms and is synoymous with reconciliation. He then redefines holiness and sacred violence ... and it just gets better and better.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon












I'm just getting into reading some of his stuff, but I can second his classiness as a person. My wife had a class with him this semester, and he had the whole class over for dinner (including spouses!), which is nice when you're young and broke.
Thanks for the recommendation Scot. I had not heard of Gorman, but your description and other material I've found this morning intrigues me to want to learn more.
A question for you and others who are familiar with his work: would it work to plunge right into "Inhabiting the Cruciform God"? Or is it a good idea to digest Gorman's earlier works first (His intro to Paul -- "Apostle of The Crucified Lord" and his "Cruciformity: Paul's Narrative Spirituality of the Cross")?
Reading all three would probably be the best answer, but time is short...
Greg,
You can begin with this one; in some ways it puts it all together.
Scot,
Between your summary and the ones Andy referenced above, I'm pretty much sold on this book. The phrase "participationist soteriology" sounds very promising. Also, this line from the author's blog gets me really encouraged:
"One major theme of the book is that many of the theological distinctions we make in analyzing Paul (justification-sanctification; declaration-transformation; faith-works; faith-love; spirituality-politics) are foreign to Paul’s way of thinking and maintaining them actually contributes to serious misunderstandings of Paul."
Good to know such words are coming from a careful scholar. Thanks.
Scot, I wholeheartedly agree with your assessment that Michael Gorman's cruciform-theosis needs more visibility and embracing among the free-falling evangelical church. I quote him in my dissertation and I was honored to have him quote one of my articles in his Inhabiting a Cruciform God which I just read this weekend, loved, and plan to incorporate into my teaching and preaching on ecclesiology. Of course, I was delighted by his wide use of Bonhoeffer and wondered by he didn't reference Bonhoeffer's "participating in the sufferings of Christ for the world" from LPP. As far as I'm concerned Bonhoeffer introduced Gorman's use of theosis, without using that term, in his last letters in prison as he re-thought his theology from a "secular" understanding of biblical concepts for the ordinary German citizen.
The spirit of Gorman's "theoformity" is located in Bonhoeffer's 1944 letters. Maybe Bonhoeffer will finally receive the credit he is due and given more attention by the wider theological community---after all Gorman is directing ecumenical efforts as a Methodist in a Catholic school. Quite possibly, Gorman offers the theology of ecumenism Bonhoeffer noted was absent during the 1930- and 40's.
Paul O. Bischoff, Ph.D.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.