Check out the responses, too.Universities are finally losing their monopoly on higher learning, as the web inexorably becomes the dominant infrastructure for knowledge serving both as a container and as a global platform for knowledge exchange between people.
Meanwhile on campus, there is fundamental challenge to the foundational modus operandi of the University -- the model of pedagogy. Specifically, there is a widening gap between the model of learning offered by many big universities and the natural way that young people who have grown up digital best learn.
The old-style lecture, with the professor standing at the podium in front of a large group of students, is still a fixture of university life on many campuses. It's a model that is teacher-focused, one-way, one-size-fits-all and the student is isolated in the learning process. Yet the students, who have grown up in an interactive digital world, learn differently. Schooled on Google and Wikipedia, they want to inquire, not rely on the professor for a detailed roadmap. They want an animated conversation, not a lecture. They want an interactive education, not a broadcast one that might have been perfectly fine for the Industrial Age, or even for boomers. These students are making new demands of universities, and if the universities try to ignore them, they will do so at their peril.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon












I'm familiar with some of Tapscott's work. I would put him in the same category of someone like Nicholas Negroponte (Being Digital) from MIT; they have an extremely high faith in technology and what it can usher into society. I read these guys listening carefully to their arguments but with skepticism. There is a change in our students due to technology but I have yet to see them use the technology for serious pursuits unless directed/required within the formal structure of a classroom.
To inquire, to have an animated conversation not a lecture, to enjoy an interactive education not a broadcast. That's what I always hoped for at a church actually. And if that's the way it'd be done my teenaged daughters and many others will actually look forward to Sunday mornings.
Never quite understood why it's a called a "service" ...
William
Mark,
Isn't the issue a shift in the brain occurring when one is used to twitter or to FB or to texting? That the brain is not used to the more patient and lengthy approach of a good, even complicated and long, argument?
Scot,
I don't think that the shift in the brain due to twitter or FB or texting is all that significant. But I do think that methods of teaching should always be changing and adapting to the environment.
The thing that struck me in Tapscott's column is his suggestion that the availability of information "knowledge" on the web would undermine a monopoly held by Universities. I don't know about you but I don't consider the dispensing of "knowledge" or facts to be a significant part of my job. My job is to teach students how to think, how to use the information available and make sense of it, and how to expand beyond our current limits, how to engage in creative problem-solving. The availability of information of the web is a tool that we use to make this easier and more effective.
If I remember you've been positive about outcome based teaching on this blog. What would you say is the goal of your teaching - what defines a good "outcome" in your opinion?
This analysis is half true. It is easy for computers and other technologies to replace a lecturer who drones on dispensing facts that may or may not lead to knowledge. But no such technology replaces a professor whose knowledge, skills, and wisdom are conveyed in a lively and thought-provoking lecture. Speaking of knowledge, skills, and wisdom, technology can supply a vast amount of the first, a bit of the second, and none of the last--the goal of an authentic education. In other words, the only aspect of contemporary university education that technology is truly displacing is that dull lecture filled with facts, which is peculiar to the modern "factory-model" university invented in the late 19th Century. To which I say, good riddance!
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.