Jesus Creed

Jesus Creed

Inexcusable

posted by Scot McKnight | 1:12pm Saturday June 13, 2009

PalinLett.jpgDavid Letterman, who will do most anything to get a laugh, especially if he can do so at the expense of a public (and conservative) figure, spoke of Sarah Palin’s daughter, who attended a Yankees game with her mother, being “knocked up” by Alex Rodriguez. He messed up his facts, thinking the daughter was the pre-married pregnant Bristol but who was in fact the 14-year old Willow, and then lamely fessed up to what he had said — but laced up his confession with cynical humor.

I’ve argued for a long time that a steady diet of cynicism destroys respect for humans, and David Letterman has now reached that level. What he said is inexcusable. Not just poor judgment, not just stupid, and not just crossing the line. It was inexcusable.

Jeremiah Wright, who has lived a life of living to craft words in preaching and who therefore knows the potency of words and the prophetic power of what he says, was asked by a reporter about whether or not he is in contact with President Obama. Wright, who says he was in a rush, said something about “Them Jews” who wouldn’t let him get to Wright. Then he came up with a lame claim that he meant “Zionists.” Since Wright is better with words than this, and since he is a man who has spent his life fighting stereotyped words that destroy the fabric of people groups, he needs to be particularly sensitive to other people groups.

Jeremiah Wright’s wrong on two accounts: neither the Jews nor the Zionists are blocking him from Obama. And what he said, since it stereotypes Jews with an age-old conspiracy about who is really in charge behind the scenes, is inexcusable.  (See this for his confession.)



Previous Posts

This blog is no longer active
This blog is no longer being actively updated. Please feel free to browse the archives or: Read our most popular inspiration blog See our most popular inspirational video Take our most popular quiz

posted 3:10:39pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Our Common Prayerbook 30 - 3
Psalm 30 thanks God (vv. 1-3, 11-12) and exhorts others to thank God (vv. 4-5). Both emerge from the concrete reality of David's own experience. Here is what that experience looks like:Step one: David was set on high and was flourishing at the hand of God's bounty (v. 7a).Step two: David became too

posted 12:15:30pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Theology After Darwin 1 (RJS)
One of the more important and more difficult pieces of the puzzle as we feel our way forward at the interface of science and faith is the theological implications of discoveries in modern science. A comment on my post Evolution in the Key of D: Deity or Deism noted: ...this reminds me of why I get a

posted 6:01:52am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Almost Christian 4
Who does well when it comes to passing on the faith to the youth? Studies show two groups do really well: conservative Protestants and Mormons; two groups that don't do well are mainline Protestants and Roman Catholics. Kenda Dean's new book is called Almost Christian: What the Faith of Ou

posted 12:01:53am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Let's Get Neanderthal!
The Cave Man Diet, or Paleo Diet, is getting attention. (Nothing is said about Culver's at all.) The big omission, I have to admit, is that those folks were hunters -- using spears or smacking some rabbit upside the conk or grabbing a fish or two with their hands ... but that's what makes this diet

posted 2:05:48pm Aug. 30, 2010 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(21)
post a comment
Kenton

posted June 13, 2009 at 1:50 pm


“A steady diet of cynicism destroys respect for humans.”
Excellent quote. Adding to facebook page.



report abuse
 

James

posted June 13, 2009 at 2:17 pm


“A steady diet of cynicism destroys respect for humans.”
I agree, very good quote. I agree with your post, and wish more of the responses I’ve seen from our brothers and sisters in Christ were as well tempered. I’ve been as wearied by those who have chosen to react to comments like those of Letterman & Wright by responding in kind. There is a way to hold their feet to the fire without joining in their wrongs, and you’ve displayed that way here. Thanks.



report abuse
 

Scott W

posted June 13, 2009 at 3:00 pm


I agree with the premise of this post. A preacher/teacher of experience and substance like the Rev. Wright, whom I respect,has no business using this type of tropein this hamfisted way. The broader point he was making–how Pres. Obama because of political considerations must walk a tighrope when it comes to his associations with Black nationalist causes–is so true. Contrary to much present hype, we don’t live in a post-racial society.
His is a voice which must be listened to but his use of this tainted language does him and his message a disservice.



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted June 13, 2009 at 3:06 pm


James,
Thanks. I read Michelle Malkin to see what the right wingers would be saying and, while she made some good points, she simply draws lines in the sand deeper.



report abuse
 

Rod

posted June 13, 2009 at 3:10 pm


Ditto to facebook.com quote.



report abuse
 

Jim Marks

posted June 13, 2009 at 3:25 pm


Our culture no longer even knows what an apology is.



report abuse
 

eugene

posted June 13, 2009 at 3:48 pm


scot,
thanks for this. i only found out via your entry. i agree: inexcusable on both fronts.
wrote something quickly on my blog:
http://eugenecho.wordpress.com/2009/06/13/shame-on-you-david-letterman-jeremiah-wright/
and i guess one of my questions:
“You have to wonder if the folks that took shot at Palin throughout the election season will do the right thing and stand with her; if the folks that defended Rev. Jeremiah Wright and in many ways, rightly defended his context of black and liberation theology will say the appropriate thing regarding this situation to this minister: ?Repent.?



report abuse
 

pds

posted June 13, 2009 at 4:44 pm


Well put. Needs to be said.
His pseudo-contrition was just an opportunity for more condescension.



report abuse
 

JohntheFisherman

posted June 13, 2009 at 4:55 pm


Couldn’t agree more about the cynicism. And in many ways, those late night talk show hosts reflect the mood of American. Lots of cynicism.
I just wish that everything I hear about Sarah Palin is how she’s persecuted. Perpetual victimhood is not a good posture to be in and does her no good politically.
Rev. Wright – what can you say? He more than anyone ought to know how to apologize but I doubt he does it often. If the shoe were on the other foot, he’d be angry and loud.



report abuse
 

Sam

posted June 13, 2009 at 5:59 pm


Scot, how do you know that the Jewish lobby and zionist gropus such as AIPAC are’nt blocking Jeremiah Wright from President Obama. Do you know this? Are you on the inside?
Zionism is a big problem, particularly Christian Zionism.



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted June 13, 2009 at 6:40 pm


Sam,
Obama is the President of the USA. If he wanted to talk to his former pastor, he could do that. Obama is making this decision.



report abuse
 

Unapologetic Catholic

posted June 13, 2009 at 7:04 pm


“You have to wonder if the folks that took shot at Palin throughout the election season will do the right thing and stand with her?”
I am one of those. I did not think she was qualfied for the office.
Letterman’s comments were inexcusably despicable on several levels.



report abuse
 

AHH

posted June 13, 2009 at 7:47 pm


Yes, inexcusable from both Letterman and (especially) Wright.
But I find it hard to work up much sympathy for Sarah Palin as a victim of grace-less comments. I don’t recall her even getting to the “pseudo-contrition” level for her comments like “palling around with terrorists”



report abuse
 

robyn beckley vining

posted June 13, 2009 at 10:53 pm


cynicism- for sure. it is ripping us apart. as is sarcasm. Fine, fine point.
letterman was totally out of line. totally inexcusable.
And wouldn’t it also be fair to say that Palin was out of line in her response? she made a sick statement that she couldn’t let her daughter near Letterman, insinuating that would be dangerous…and leading the public to believe it was for perverse reasons (I believe she used the word “pervert”). When asked to explain her remark, she was equally creepyin return to Letterman, insinuating that the public can “take her remark as they like and interpret it for themselves.” She didn’t own up either, which is equally a problem. She was vengeful and out to damage another. I understand she was upset, and rightfully so, but her behavior was also disgusting.
And between Palin and Letterman? Palin calls herself an “evangelical Christian.” Unacceptable. Both of them.



report abuse
 

Don Bryant

posted June 14, 2009 at 4:48 am


You are too easy on Wright. He is in the same league as Letterman when it comes to hurtful words. The man is too used to people taking him seriously.



report abuse
 

Richie Heimbrock

posted June 14, 2009 at 8:33 am


If Palin hadn’t used the last 10 months to make a public hobby of vilifying anyone who may disagree with her, I might be more inclined to take Her offense more seriously. I freely admit that I do not care for Sarah Palin, her brand of politics, or quite frankly, her understanding of Christianity and/or America.
But, she has been unfairly attacked in the last 10 months on a wide variety of levels. Letterman has never been kind in his dealing with her, and this is an example of him coming up to or crossing the line.
But which person is the Christian in this situation? I can’t really tell from the behavior of either person. To my knowledge Letterman has never really talked about any faith, while Palin has been very vocal about hers
Is insinuating that Letterman is a pedophile really the best response?
It is easy to get worked up at the person we don’t like of the two (probably depending upon what political bent you come from), but if we are going to be thorough in critique this situation, I think we must admit that both people have made statements that are inexcusable.



report abuse
 

Tracy Riley

posted June 14, 2009 at 8:51 am


I think that neither one of these people should be saying anything. What would Jesus do to them if he were here right now. People now a days have little to no morals and it is no wonder that teens are pregnant and voilated before they get into high school. I am a mother of a 13year old. I make sure she knows what is appropriate and what is not. Dressing like a little harlet is not. We have a strong christian faith and by G-d’s grace I can raise her to be a respectful adult.



report abuse
 

Peggy

posted June 14, 2009 at 4:52 pm


Is insinuating that Letterman is a pedophile really the best response?———————————– My response to you is no. But he is thinking about a young girl having sex? Yes. So what would you define that as??? Governor Palin was well-respected until this election. Now people can not cut her down enough. But the Bible says Christians will be persecuted. Same goes for Ms. California! But in the end who will win out??? Think about it!



report abuse
 

Alison

posted June 14, 2009 at 8:13 pm


You’re very right on both points, Scot. Both Wright and Letterman hopefully will learn from this that the old saw of “if you haven’t got anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all” really is true. Both were clearly in the “inexcusable” category in what they said, and it seems like it’s come back to bite them.
This is not to allow Palin’s comments insinuating pedophilia on Letterman to go unchallenged, however. I will grant that if I were in her shoes, I’d be mad as a hornet if some cynical late night comic tried to have a few laughs at my child’s expense. But to say what she said (implying that Letterman was a pedophile) only added fuel to the fire on this, and hopefully she has learned that as well. Has everyone forgotten the lesson of James 3 about the power of the tongue? I hope we can all remember that from all this ugliness, and learn to choose our words more carefully, since they can, and often will, come back to haunt us.



report abuse
 

Rog

posted June 15, 2009 at 7:10 am


Are these the Palin comments some are saying are unChristian?
Sarah Palin: “Concerning Letterman’s comments about my young daughter (and I doubt he’d ever dare make such comments about anyone else’s daughter): ‘Laughter incited by sexually perverted comments made by a 62-year-old male celebrity aimed at a 14-year-old girl is not only disgusting, but it reminds us some Hollywood/NY entertainers have a long way to go in understanding what the rest of America understands — that acceptance of inappropriate sexual comments about an underage girl, who could be anyone’s daughter, contributes to the atrociously high rate of sexual exploitation of minors by older men who use and abuse others.’”



report abuse
 

Rick in Texas

posted June 15, 2009 at 11:08 pm


Now let’s say: “All right, Dave, this is a responsible apology. Good Job”
http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/06/letterman-readdresses-palin.html



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.