Daily Prayers:
- A. Book of Common Prayer
- A. Book of Common Prayer 2
- A. Divine Hours
- A. Evening Prayer (Anglican)
- A. Morning Prayer (Anglican)
- Celtic Prayer
- Creeds of Christendom
- Eastern Orthodox Prayers
- Lectionary
- Liturgy of the Hours
- Missio Dei
Emerging Movement:
- Andrew Jones
- Andrew Perriman
- Anthony Stiff
- Art Boulet
- Bob Robinson
- Br. Maynard
- Dan Kimball
- David Fitch
- Dogwood Abbey
- Ecclesia Network
- Emerging Women
- Eugene Cho
- Henrik Holmgaard
- Jamie Arpin-Ricci
- Jazz Theologian
- John Frye
- John Lagrou
- Jonny Baker
- JR Briggs
- Leonard Hjamarlson
- LeRon Shults
- Lukas McKnight
- Peggy Brown
- Sivin Kit
- Stephen Shields
- Steve McCoy
- Steve Taylor
- Tamara Buchan
- The Practicing Church
- Tim Miekley
- Todd Hiestand
- Tom Smith (RSA)
- Tony Jones
Other sites I frequent:
- Allan Bevere
- Andy Rowell
- Attie Nel
- Barna
- Brad Boydston
- Chris Ridgeway
- CC Blogs
- Don Johnson
- Ed Gilbreath
- Erika Haub (Carney)
- Faith Blogging
- Falsani
- Fr. Rob
- Hummers
- iMonk
- James McGrath
- Jim Martin
- John Stackhouse
- JR Woodward
- Karen Spears Zacharias
- Laura Barringer
- LaVonne Neff
- LeaderFOCUS
- LL Barkat
- Luke/Annika
- Mark Galli
- Mark Roberts
- Michael Kruse
- Nexus
- Owen Youngman
- Ted Gossard
- Tom Wright
Recommended Online Readings:
Scholarly Books I’ve written:
- Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels
- Hist Jesus Anthology
- Interpreting the Synoptic Gospels
- Introducing NT Interpretation
- Jesus and His Death
- Jesus in Memory (ed.)
- New Vision for Israel
- Synoptics: Biblio
- The Face of New Testament Studies
- Who Do They Say I Am?
Scholarship Online:
- Apollos
- Books & Culture
- ChristianityToday
- CS Lewis
- EAC
- Early Xian Writings
- Euaggelion
- Gospels
- Jesus and His Death Blog
- Karl Barth Online
- Mark Goodacre’s Weblog
- Online Journals Access
- Online Pseudepigraph
- Pete Enns
- Prime Time Jesus
- Theopedia
- ThinkTank
Stuff online:
- 5 Streams
- Big Muddy
- Catalyst Scripture
- Catching the Wave
- DaVinci Code
- Forgiveness
- Future or Fad?
- Gospel of Judas
- High Calling
- Interview on Emerging
- Interview with LL Barkat
- IVCF Eikons
- IVCF Gospel
- John Bunyan
- Keys of the Kingdom
- Lake Emerging
- Mary in CT
- Missional in Seattle
- Missional Matrix
- Nativity Story
- Never Alone
- New Perspective
- Pepperdine Interview
- Professor as Scholar
- Recl Mind Mary 1
- Robust Gospel
- Social Justice
- Trojan Horse 2
- WiredParish Mary Interview
- Word/World NPP















posted July 23, 2009 at 10:03 am
The first time I read the gospel of John when I was a teenager, I saw this very thing, though I didn’t have vocabulary for it at the time. Thirty-plus years of hearing preaching focused on the cross-as-punishment for my sins has pulled my gaze from the awe of incarnation, though in recent years I’ve found my soul’s gaze returning to its impact and beauty.
Thanks for blogging through the book. It’s going on my wish list!
posted July 23, 2009 at 2:01 pm
I don’t know.. I’ve never understood why God would need to sacrifice his son to forgive us. Would I kill my daughter because my dog wouldn’t stop chewing on the couch?
The Son came into the world and the evil world killed Him, just as it tries to do to everyone who teaches love over hate,* and then God raised Jesus up to show the ultimate triumph of Good over evil.
* I’m sure if Jesus, the subversive nobody from nowhere who speaks truth to power and preaches the Kingdom, were here right now someone would be working to kill him.
posted July 23, 2009 at 7:24 pm
JJoe #2,
While I agree that God raising Jesus from the dead shows his victory over death and evil I think there is a lot more going on then just that.
“Would I kill my daughter because my dog wouldn’t stop chewing on the couch?”
I don’t think this analogy is fair. A dog chewing on a couch doesn’t really capture our problem of being broken people or the severity of our capacity for evil. As well, your nature and your daughter isn’t the same as God the Father’s and God the Son’s.
Here is my view on it:
God as Trinity is still one God but three persons. In bringing life through Jesus, through his life, death, and resurrection God is solving the problem of human evil and sin within Himself as a divine community.
I don’t think it was a case of God punishing his Son as an act of divine child abuse as some have put it. I would say Jesus dying for us and instead of us is God lovingly taking our problem on Himself–Himself sacrificing for us as the Triune God.
In terms of why did Jesus have to die? Does sin result in death? My take on it is that we are created beings who have become not as we were intended to be and in fact we have become our own worst enemies. Death comes through living independent of a right relationship with God. That broken part of us, our nature that is prone to that independent living needs to die–share in Jesus’ death so new creation can start.
What you do think?
posted July 23, 2009 at 8:02 pm
IN #3
I meant to end with:
What do you think?
Sorry
C
posted July 24, 2009 at 12:32 pm
I think the problem is now even more complicated, for you have made me realize that in my example I also created the dog!!
The magnitude of the evil doesn’t matter… the key point is why I must kill one creature I love for the sins of another creature I love.
Why would God have a problem of human evil and sin within Himself? The more I think about that, the more I see only pure symbolism – the concept that we must die to sin. So in our limited understanding, we project that need upon God.
As you say, my nature is not the same as God’s. I can see trying to kill part of my psyche, but is not God perfectly good? With therefore no need to die to sin?
posted July 24, 2009 at 5:45 pm
JJoe,
Sometimes I think issues with different atonement theories stem from our Christology–who Jesus is.
Maybe your key point “why I must kill one creature I love for the sins of another creature I love.” hits on it. Was Jesus just a creature or created being? Or is He God both fully human and fully divine? If he was just a creature than him dying for our sins doesn’t make much sense.
I think Scot’s post on “God is holy” touches on why God would have issues being true to Himself as perfectly good and Holy and turning a blind I to sin and evil. Sin and evil is our problem in terms of where it originated and God has chose to do what we couldn’t do on our own because of His loving holiness.
I didn’t mean to say that God has a problem with human evil within Himself but I meant that He has chosen to deal with our problem of evil within Himself–Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Our evil is an issue because of his holy love for us. The need to die for sin isn’t for God to kill a part of himself but for us; so he can bear it for us, instead of us, with us.
Then in union with Jesus we share in his death, and in his life–the life of the triune God. For me, communion becomes a symbolic act of sharing in his death and new life through the Holy Spirit.
What were your thoughts on the God is holy post?