There is a dustup these days about the origins
of evangelicalism: is it to be traced to the Reformation or to the 18th
Century? (Never mind that many just say it goes back to the New
Testament itself!)
Andy Tooley, a friend of ours and this blog, is a student of
David Bebbington, who is Britain's leading light on the history of
evangelicalism, and currently works for the Institute for the Study of
American Evangelicals at Wheaton College. He wrote a niece piece on evangelicalism and emerging (link here). Bebbington anchors
evangelicalism (as we now know it) in the 18th Century where some major
influences reshaped Protestantism. Recently some scholars put
Bebbington's theories to the test. Thanks to Andy for this post.
In a recent review of Michael Haykin and Ken Stewart's edited volume
entitled The Advent of Evangelicalism, editor at large Collin Hansen at Christianity Today rightly observes that some sixteen authors
discuss several problems with David Bebbington's descriptive framework in the
book. What Hansen does not point out,
however, is that nearly all of the contributors end their examinations
by confirming the relative soundness of the quadrilateral and, most
importantly, affirming Bebbington's thesis that evangelicalism was a
new movement that emerged in the eighteenth-century.
[The now well-known Bebbington quadrilateral is that evangelicalism is
characterized by Bible, cross, conversion, and active Christian living.]
Interestingly, and revealingly, Hansen also chooses to grant authority
to a contributor who is not widely recognized to be an expert on the
topic on which he has chosen to write.
He then incorrectly suggests
that this contributor makes the strongest argument as to why evangelicalism is
not an eighteenth-century innovation.
Hansen emphasizes this, I believe, because both he and this
contributor are interested in shoring up Reformed theology and a
particular type of Reformed Evangelicalism, a trait they share with the
editors of the book.
In the penultimate
paragraph of Hansen's review he lists a series of "ifs" with which I
disagree. Why is Evangelicalism less credible if it is not completely
rooted in the Reformation?
Why also is it less credible if it happens to be more deeply
rooted in the various Enlightenment movements of the 18th century than
one would like or have thought?
Perhaps my failure to agree with Hansen on these "what if"
scenarios stems from my belief that the mixing of culture, in this case
the English and Scottish enlightenments, with Christian belief and
practice is not only inevitable, but it possesses the potential to
bring vitality to Christianity.
And I believe this mixture that characterized the emergence of Evangelicalism during the Great Awakenings of the 18th century did indeed bring a new vitality to Protestant Christianity as it became much more focused on activism through a devotion to missions.
There is, of course, much more to be said, but Hansen's review presents its readers with an incorrect picture of Evangelicalism and the dangers facing it if it is indeed an 18th Century innovation.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon












Patrick, good point. Yes, Pentecostalism may well prove to be its own new shift. Well, it's over 100 years old now already and it is clearly a variant on evangelicalism's revivalism.
Ken - thanks for the stimulating points. Difference of magnitude and scale is one thing, conceptual shifts are another. To me it seems really significant that modern Evangelicalism from the 18thC onwards popularizes the language of 'revival', 'awakening' and 'outpourings of the Spirit'. This new conceptualisation of religious experience changes things. It opens up new possibilities (ones that wouldn't have pleased Luther or Calvin) and prepares the way for populist experiential movements like Pentecostalism. So Jonathan Edwards and Co have a lot to answer for, even if they didn't foresee it! They really did innovate, even as they remained profoundly shaped by Reformation Protestantism.
John:
I have recently done a study on the etymology of the vocabulary of "revival" utilizing the Oxford English Dictionary and its American counterpart, the Dictionary of American English. You will know that such dictionaries trace historical usage by actual citation. What emerges does not especially support the thesis that a new idea arises in and around 1730.
The first documentable usage of the term 'revival' is dated to Cotton Mather in 1702. In recommending Edwards _Narrative of Surprizing Conversions_ to an English readership in 1737, Isaac Watts and John Guyse use older terminology such as "effusion of the Spirit" to describe the events Edwards narrated.
The OED and DOAE suggest that it is really in the early nineteenth century that the vocabulary of revival, revivalist, and revivalism "take off". To the extent that this is true, our modern conceptions (which tend to emphasize a continuity between Wesley, Whitefield and Edwards and all that follows)seem to involve a kind of telescoping-down of a complexity which ought to be taken more seriously. George Whitefield is not merely precursor to D.L. Moody and Billy Graham.
But having said this, I want to grant that theological reflection and writing about revival seems to be taken seriously for the first time after 1730, and that is something which draws a line of sorts between what has preceded and what follows. It is not the occurrence of revival but the framework (or as you say, conceptualization)which undergoes alteration. Yet to make the early eighteenth century developments to be just "of a piece" with nineteenth century revivalism is seriously mistaken.
That's helpful, Ken. We need more of these etymological studies to trace conceptual shifts. And I'm sure you're right that there is significant conceptual movement between the 1730s and the early 19thC. As always with historical accounts, it's the challenge of striking the balance between acknowledging continuity and registering change, whether between the 17th and the 18thC, or the 18th and the 19thC.
Good to see the book generating discussion.
Incidentally, Ken - it's worth looking at Eighteenth-Century Collections Online. What one notices there is a clustering of Evangelical titles on the 'revival' of religion in the 1730s/40s and again from the late 1770s onwards.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.