Jesus Creed

Religion or Revolution? 5

Thursday November 12, 2009

Boyd.jpgGreg Boyd, in his newest book, The Myth of a Christian Religion: Losing Your Religion for the Beauty of a Revolution  summons us to revolt against idols and -- in today's post -- against judgment.

How pervasive is judgmentalism? What do you think we can do about it? Would you say it is idolatrous to judge others?

Greg, sitting in a mall watching people, began to listen to his own commentary on the people he was watching and was amazed at how judgmental he was. It made him feel alive to tear others down; it exalted himself. 

We all do this. We need to think about it more. 

What do you think of the following definition?

But judgment is not the same as discernment. Discernment distinguishes the good from the bad while judgment separates myself (whom I consider good) from others (whom I consider bad). Judgment is idolatry because it places us in God's place.

People do this in nationalism. People do this in petty judgments. Love is to lay down your life for another. And we are called to give the same worth to others that God gives to those same others. They are God's Eikons.

"Nothing is more central to the Kingdom than agreeing with God about every person's unsurpassable worth and reflecting this in how we act toward them" (51).

Judgment and Life (and love) are antithetical: To judge is to usurp God's role and to sit in judgment on others; to love is to give ourselves to them. We are called to choose between the judgment game or the grace game.
Advertisement
Comments
Kate
November 12, 2009 4:04 PM

I can relate to this experience of listening to my own internal commentary and being shocked at my judgmentalism. For me it happened recently when driving in chaotic African traffic. It's not just frustration at bad driving, but I noticed how I constantly applied the worst motives to the "idiots" in cars around me, while congratulating myself on my good driving. No mercy in my judgment, and no discernment either. The others are all evil, stupid,selfish etc. etc. and I alone am good... Hmmm.

Ted M. Gossard
November 12, 2009 5:09 PM
http://communityofjesus.blogspot.com/

We do need to judge ourselves. And then we can help others with their faults. This seems to turn the tables on judgmentalism. Because we are dealing with sin in our own lives and finding God's mercy, it's all about helping others to find that same mercy.

At the same time it's not like we arrive and don't have to pinch ourselves when we do cross the line and think badly of another. While at the same time we need to stop ourselves in our tracks when the judgment from our lips on us is also not according to God's revealed will concerning us. As I seek to think rightly of myself, I can better think rightly of others, with sober judgment.

Interesting post.

Dana Ames
November 12, 2009 5:52 PM

Boyd seems to come to conclusions that are echoes of Fr. Meletios Weber's discussion of the whole topic of differentiation in order to make sure of one's existence. A wonderful journal article he wrote was expanded into the first few chapters of "Bread, Water, Wine and Oil". Sounds positively patristic!

Dana

rebeccat
November 12, 2009 7:21 PM

Jeremy, I think pretty clearly that the Corinthians passage means that we should not tolerate those who are notorious sinners to continue in fellowship in the body of Christ as if they were doing nothing wrong. This seems to be an instruction for a particular sort of situation, but not really an approach for dealing with people in general. We do need to keep sight on what is right and wrong, moral and immoral. Those things do matter. But there is a difference between allowing someone who is openly and notoriously engaged in scandalous behavior to continue in fellowship as if they are A-OK and pulling out our scales to render judgment on the worth of each human being we pass.

I don't think anyone is saying that not being judgmental means we should turn a blind eye towards things which are clearly beyond the pale - adultery, theft, addictions, etc. But more often, we are guilty of judging people as not people we should be expected to associate with based on good faith differences of belief (ie creationist vs evolution), whether the person is attractive and easy to get along with or if they are rough and uncomfortable. And the simple fact is that this is a danger because we humans are capable of coming up with rationals for just about anything we want to do or think. Pretty quickly, we go from the biblical injunction not to associate with a man involved in incest to feeling quite justified in refusing to deal with the woman you think is dressed inappropriately who smokes and talks too loud. Even worse, in today's world we seem to find ourselves too often in a place where we don't feel we can say anything to the couple living together who attends church every week and wants to lead a small group, but feel quite justified in shunning people who violate one of our sacred cows (manners, dress, opinions, etc) in the name of judging rightly.

I also think that we need to be careful even in dealing with those whose sins are quite clear. The 1 Corinthians passage you quote specifically says that such people should be turned away "so that the sinful nature may be destroyed and his spirit saved on the day of the Lord." IOW, it's for a purpose greater than being able to say, "I judged rightly." In Paul's day, being turned out of the church would mean being turned out of a tight community. And given that it was a community that was not very well accepted, the person being turned out must have seriously wanted to be there, so being turned out would be quite jarring. It would be much more like the Amish shunning someone who left the faith than what most people would experience at the local church. So, I think it is legitimate to ask if simply turning someone away because they are sinning will actually serve the same purpose that Paul is talking about here. Unfortunately, there are no good pat answers to that one. For example, I have known pastors who refused to perform wedding ceremonies for couples living together, others who perform them without hardly saying a word. And one wise pastor who would only marry couples who agreed to live apart for 6 months while going through pre-cana classes and would even help make arrangements. It seems to me that often the church places too high a premium on rendering right judgment while pretty much refusing to consider how to best achieve the larger goal of bringing the person to repentance. The simple fact is that in our culture today, there are very, very, very, very, very, very, very few people who will be brought to repentance because they feel judged by the church or a Christian. At which point, our judgment, while perhaps correct, is likely to be completely counter-productive.

TomK
November 12, 2009 10:23 PM

I think we need to judge those within the body of Christ much more than those outside. Somehow we have gotten this backward and we judge everyone outside and give a pass to those sins that are closer to home. We judge the gay community much more harsh than we judge the divorced person inside our church walls. We judge the doubting person more than we judge the "christian" that is treating his employees badley.
We seem to judge each other using the wrong set of rules so our judgement seems to be all messed up somehow.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Jesus Creed

Scot McKnight is a widely-recognized authority on the New Testament, early Christianity, and the historical Jesus. He is the Karl A. Olsson Professor in Religious Studies at North Park University (Chicago, Illinois). A popular and witty speaker, Dr. McKnight has given interviews on radios across the nation, has appeared on television, and is regularly asked to speak in local churches and educational events. Dr. McKnight obtained his Ph.D. at the University of Nottingham (1986). Click to continue reading Scot McKnight's Bio...

View Scot's Speaking Schedule

Contact Scot at Facebook

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Jesus Creed

Calendar



Add to Technorati Favorites

Blogroll

Daily Prayers:

Emerging Movement:

Other sites I frequent:

Recommended Online Readings:

Scholarly Books I've written:

Scholarship Online:

Stuff online:

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.