Daily Prayers:
- A. Book of Common Prayer
- A. Book of Common Prayer 2
- A. Divine Hours
- A. Evening Prayer (Anglican)
- A. Morning Prayer (Anglican)
- Celtic Prayer
- Creeds of Christendom
- Eastern Orthodox Prayers
- Lectionary
- Liturgy of the Hours
- Missio Dei
Emerging Movement:
- Andrew Jones
- Andrew Perriman
- Anthony Stiff
- Art Boulet
- Bob Robinson
- Br. Maynard
- Dan Kimball
- David Fitch
- Dogwood Abbey
- Ecclesia Network
- Emerging Women
- Eugene Cho
- Henrik Holmgaard
- Jamie Arpin-Ricci
- Jazz Theologian
- John Frye
- John Lagrou
- Jonny Baker
- JR Briggs
- Leonard Hjamarlson
- LeRon Shults
- Lukas McKnight
- Peggy Brown
- Sivin Kit
- Stephen Shields
- Steve McCoy
- Steve Taylor
- Tamara Buchan
- The Practicing Church
- Tim Miekley
- Todd Hiestand
- Tom Smith (RSA)
- Tony Jones
Other sites I frequent:
- Allan Bevere
- Andy Rowell
- Attie Nel
- Barna
- Brad Boydston
- Chris Ridgeway
- CC Blogs
- Don Johnson
- Ed Gilbreath
- Erika Haub (Carney)
- Faith Blogging
- Falsani
- Fr. Rob
- Hummers
- iMonk
- James McGrath
- Jim Martin
- John Stackhouse
- JR Woodward
- Karen Spears Zacharias
- Laura Barringer
- LaVonne Neff
- LeaderFOCUS
- LL Barkat
- Luke/Annika
- Mark Galli
- Mark Roberts
- Michael Kruse
- Nexus
- Owen Youngman
- Ted Gossard
- Tom Wright
Recommended Online Readings:
Scholarly Books I’ve written:
- Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels
- Hist Jesus Anthology
- Interpreting the Synoptic Gospels
- Introducing NT Interpretation
- Jesus and His Death
- Jesus in Memory (ed.)
- New Vision for Israel
- Synoptics: Biblio
- The Face of New Testament Studies
- Who Do They Say I Am?
Scholarship Online:
- Apollos
- Books & Culture
- ChristianityToday
- CS Lewis
- EAC
- Early Xian Writings
- Euaggelion
- Gospels
- Jesus and His Death Blog
- Karl Barth Online
- Mark Goodacre’s Weblog
- Online Journals Access
- Online Pseudepigraph
- Pete Enns
- Prime Time Jesus
- Theopedia
- ThinkTank
Stuff online:
- 5 Streams
- Big Muddy
- Catalyst Scripture
- Catching the Wave
- DaVinci Code
- Forgiveness
- Future or Fad?
- Gospel of Judas
- High Calling
- Interview on Emerging
- Interview with LL Barkat
- IVCF Eikons
- IVCF Gospel
- John Bunyan
- Keys of the Kingdom
- Lake Emerging
- Mary in CT
- Missional in Seattle
- Missional Matrix
- Nativity Story
- Never Alone
- New Perspective
- Pepperdine Interview
- Professor as Scholar
- Recl Mind Mary 1
- Robust Gospel
- Social Justice
- Trojan Horse 2
- WiredParish Mary Interview
- Word/World NPP














posted November 10, 2009 at 8:34 am
I like the concept. Too bad we really don’t have mechanisms to make something like this work.
posted November 10, 2009 at 10:45 am
“I’m glad the House voted in favor of health care and against public funding of abortion”
One of the problems with out system is that unless the House and Senate pass exactly the same bill, the two have to be reconciled in a “conference committee.” What goes in the conference — invariably by the party elite, behind closed doors — can easily undo whatever minor victory the so-called pro-life Dems achieved.
If there is a conference, the resulting bill will have both a public option and public financing of abortion.
This is the problem with pro-life Democrats. They can vote for all the pro-life legislation they want. Unfortunately they still keep Pelosi et al in power, and she gets to choose which bills she will allow them to vote on.
@Paul,
It’s called the US postal service. Seriously. I send money to crisis pregnancy centers through the mail. The pro-choicers can send it to Murder Inc. Lots of them do, but a great many are more concerned with getting me to fund abortion than spending any of their own money on it.
posted November 10, 2009 at 12:30 pm
I’m strongly pro-life, so I’m glad this issue has been flagged in the health care debate. I’m also glad the Catholic Bishops have been a driving force here, because they otherwise support health care reform, so this obviously is not merely a right-wing attempt to derail the whole project.
Having said that, Neff’s argument is cute, but it really isn’t fair to the views of the pro-choice side. Their point is that abortion is a form of healthcare; excluding abortion funding from a comprehensive healthcare plan, they argue, deprives women of full access to care. The real debate should be sober and deep — is a human fetus a being with moral status or not — and the other side’s arguments should be taken seriously. I think a human fetus does have moral status, but I’m not going to claim that is self-evident at every stage of fetal development.
posted November 10, 2009 at 9:18 pm
I wish there could be an acceptable but powerful iconic image of abortion like the “Execution of a Viet Cong Guerrilla” image from 1968.