Daily Prayers:
- A. Book of Common Prayer
- A. Book of Common Prayer 2
- A. Divine Hours
- A. Evening Prayer (Anglican)
- A. Morning Prayer (Anglican)
- Celtic Prayer
- Creeds of Christendom
- Eastern Orthodox Prayers
- Lectionary
- Liturgy of the Hours
- Missio Dei
Emerging Movement:
- Andrew Jones
- Andrew Perriman
- Anthony Stiff
- Art Boulet
- Bob Robinson
- Br. Maynard
- Dan Kimball
- David Fitch
- Dogwood Abbey
- Ecclesia Network
- Emerging Women
- Eugene Cho
- Henrik Holmgaard
- Jamie Arpin-Ricci
- Jazz Theologian
- John Frye
- John Lagrou
- Jonny Baker
- JR Briggs
- Leonard Hjamarlson
- LeRon Shults
- Lukas McKnight
- Peggy Brown
- Sivin Kit
- Stephen Shields
- Steve McCoy
- Steve Taylor
- Tamara Buchan
- The Practicing Church
- Tim Miekley
- Todd Hiestand
- Tom Smith (RSA)
- Tony Jones
Other sites I frequent:
- Allan Bevere
- Andy Rowell
- Attie Nel
- Barna
- Brad Boydston
- Chris Ridgeway
- CC Blogs
- Don Johnson
- Ed Gilbreath
- Erika Haub (Carney)
- Faith Blogging
- Falsani
- Fr. Rob
- Hummers
- iMonk
- James McGrath
- Jim Martin
- John Stackhouse
- JR Woodward
- Karen Spears Zacharias
- Laura Barringer
- LaVonne Neff
- LeaderFOCUS
- LL Barkat
- Luke/Annika
- Mark Galli
- Mark Roberts
- Michael Kruse
- Nexus
- Owen Youngman
- Ted Gossard
- Tom Wright
Recommended Online Readings:
Scholarly Books I’ve written:
- Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels
- Hist Jesus Anthology
- Interpreting the Synoptic Gospels
- Introducing NT Interpretation
- Jesus and His Death
- Jesus in Memory (ed.)
- New Vision for Israel
- Synoptics: Biblio
- The Face of New Testament Studies
- Who Do They Say I Am?
Scholarship Online:
- Apollos
- Books & Culture
- ChristianityToday
- CS Lewis
- EAC
- Early Xian Writings
- Euaggelion
- Gospels
- Jesus and His Death Blog
- Karl Barth Online
- Mark Goodacre’s Weblog
- Online Journals Access
- Online Pseudepigraph
- Pete Enns
- Prime Time Jesus
- Theopedia
- ThinkTank
Stuff online:
- 5 Streams
- Big Muddy
- Catalyst Scripture
- Catching the Wave
- DaVinci Code
- Forgiveness
- Future or Fad?
- Gospel of Judas
- High Calling
- Interview on Emerging
- Interview with LL Barkat
- IVCF Eikons
- IVCF Gospel
- John Bunyan
- Keys of the Kingdom
- Lake Emerging
- Mary in CT
- Missional in Seattle
- Missional Matrix
- Nativity Story
- Never Alone
- New Perspective
- Pepperdine Interview
- Professor as Scholar
- Recl Mind Mary 1
- Robust Gospel
- Social Justice
- Trojan Horse 2
- WiredParish Mary Interview
- Word/World NPP















posted December 14, 2009 at 8:39 am
I think that the critique of postmodernity is especially insightful, and explains much of what is happening in our evangelicalism as of late. There are trends which appear to be good and worthwhile but are quickly flopping or falling short, and this helps get at the reasons why.
Also, I am concerned what has happened to the concept of ‘mystery’ as a whole. Not to be overly anecdotal, but it has been my experience that many believers think of mystery as something that is confusing, contradictory, or illogical. This means that they shy away from any mystery in the faith because they want something that ‘has all the answers’ and are finding ways to ‘solve the mystery’ rather than explore the richness and depths of it.
Certainly this notion has a part to play in a discussion like this, but perhaps rests somewhere between Modernity and Postmodernity. I’ve not pushed on this, so I would be interested in other perspectives and how it relates to the missional church.
posted December 14, 2009 at 10:46 am
Is “the Story” to Roxburgh and Boren the same as “metanarrative” in contemporary discussions?
posted December 14, 2009 at 11:04 am
John, can’t recall if he gets into the metanarrative deconstruction theme. And I can’t get to the book right now.
posted December 14, 2009 at 2:19 pm
OK–disclaimer–I have not read the book.
But it’s interesting in his definitions of Modernity and POMO his reduction of these two terms smacks of Modernity!
Having said this does he offer a way beyond this?
Also, I notice when folks criticize Modernity or POMO they usually resort to these very same methodologies–is this inescapable and does it therefore negate the critique they offer?
Or, is are they going to offer a critical realist way foward?