We'll have two Movie reviews tonight for our opening night for Friday Night at the Movies. We welcome discussion on the movie and on the review, and we welcome more reviews of the same movie. So here we go ....
One Pastor's Eye on The Book of Eli
By John W. Frye
Who would have imagined a 21st century movie made about The King James Version of the Bible? Denzel Washington's The Book of Eli puts the 1611 Bible dead center in the story. The tag line of the film: "Some will kill to have it. He will kill to protect it." This is a "battle for the Bible" like I have never seen. Having seen the film [spoiler alert], I am trying to find a way to synchronize its message with anything in the Bible.
Should we be glad a man named Eli (means "my God") risks his life and slaughters many people in order to get the only surviving Bible to a printing press so that others can have access to it? The story opens 30 years after a global, nuclear holocaust; a holocaust sparked by warring religions. Survivors are living in the grim, chaotic and violent remains of civilization. Values are altered so that KFC wet wipes are exchanged as currency and water is extremely scarce. Eli (played by Denzel Washington) is "a walker" who is commissioned by "a voice" to head west to deliver the literary treasure in his possession. In the story, Eli is the good, yet stunningly violent guy. The Christian Science Monitor review labels Eli "a pacifist warrior" meaning that Eli is a peaceful man unless provoked. Eli's nemesis is Carnegie (played by Gary Oldman) who is collecting books in his desperate search of copy of the Bible. Carnegie, the bad guy, wants the Bible because he believes he can use it to keep ignorant, bewildered people in sheep-like submission to his power. Carnegie seeks to capture the Bible faithfully carried and zealously protected by Eli. With Carnegie and Eli, we are presented with a post-apocalyptic Satan and a very uncharacteristic, gun-slinging, knife-wielding Messiah. Is The Book of Eli a postmodern, cinematic Pilgrim's Progress? I don't think so.
As a viewer I got caught in the story, eager for Eli to
fulfill his quest with "the book" and fearful that Carnegie would succeed in
his evil pursuit to seize "the book." Because this film is about the Bible, it
is not like Frodo trying to get the (one) ring to the Cracks of Doom. Eli and
Carnegie are human beings who, for different reasons, are obsessed with the
Bible. If Eli is a metaphor for a committed person who is willing to die for
the Bible, then I would rest easy. But Eli convincingly demonstrates that "he will
kill to protect it."
As a pastor, I have questions. Can a Christian person be a
pacifist until provoked and then become a killing machine? Does walking by
faith and not by sight have room to use keen hearing to kill the enemies of
"the book"? Eli is blind. There is a telling line in the movie when Eli
confesses that he spent his life protecting the Bible only to realize that he
must live its message: to treat
others as he wants to be treated. This confession comes after massive bloodshed
from his killing expertise.
The Golden Rule? That's it? Eli is protecting the Golden
Rule? This is where I felt the let down. The passion for the story
evaporated. That, and the ending when
the newly printed Alcatraz edition of the King James Version is placed next to
the Koran. I wonder if Denzel, a professing committed Christian, really wanted
this ending or was it the Hollywood, politically-correct thing to include? Or,
is The Book of Eli sending a
contemporary message to those who terrorize others in the name of Allah that
they, too, will be terrorized by those who love the God of the KJV? I don't
know and I hope not.
The Bible is not about the Golden Rule. The Bible presents
not a rule, but a Person--the Prince of Peace. The Bible does offer a love like
no human love and that love has a name: Jesus the Christ. The closest the movie
comes to any relationality about the God of the Christian faith is when Eli recites
the opening verses from Psalm 23 to Solara, a young female devotee of Eli's.
I wrote a novella titled Out
of Print: A Novel. In this
story, there are no Bibles except for what has been memorized by people. Scot
McKnight wrote the Afterword for the
book. Out of Print and The Book of Eli have a similar aim: to
give the Bible its rightful place in the world. But the two stories are poles
apart. For whatever reason if you like The
Book of Eli, I invite you to read Out
of Print. Eli's line fits my story and the evangelical church's story. Have
we been so zealous to protect the Bible that we have failed to live its God-incarnate,
God-inspired message? Out of Print suggests
that the church not only has a Bible, the church is the Bible to a watching
world one button away from the apocalypse.
www.outofprintnovel.com/products-page
Add to Del.icio.us
Add to Technorati
Add to Digg
Add to Newsvine
Add to Facebook
Add to StumbleUpon
Subscribe
"The Bible is not about the Golden Rule"
OK, maybe not... but Jesus seemed to think it was a pretty good start, or at least a pretty good summary of the T and N of the Tanakh.
And yes, as my sig/website might suggest, I'm a bit biased.
My husband and I (both Christians) watched the movie recently, in spite of being hesitant of its rating and vulgarity.
We were impressed.. not by the violence but by the blatant value placed on the Word of God. It may be watered down to appeal to a secular audience a little, and it may include some violence that doesn't need to be there.. BUT. Life without the word of the Lord would be exactly that vulgar, immoral and lawless. So I was ok with that. Anything less would be unrealistic and we would be kidding ourselves to think otherwise. There are scenes painted for us in the Old Testament that show exactly what a world without the hope and love of Christ could turn into. The Gospel wasn't known in Eli's world so I think it should be expected that people would be at their most sinful.
Eli himself? I'm impressed with the role because let's face it, not even Christian films show someone listening for God's voice let alone acting on it. It shows a true walk of faith. It does not show a perfect person. If he had been perfect, passive, not fighting back, nonviolent then he wouldn't have been a man trying to walk with God. He would have had to have been the one perfect person, Jesus.
Also, the violence? He defended himself. He defended the bible. He defended a helpless girl. There are very few things that are worth killing/dying for and in a culture where we seem to feel like nothing is worth killing/dying/standing for.... I'm ok with Eli.
This obviously wasn't a typical Christian film. It wasn't about a man wanting God because he wanted to save his marriage, or any other typical depiction of why people need Jesus. Eli wasn't looking for anything from God. He was simply willing to serve him in obedience in an awful world, looking for nothing in return.
Also, it's funny because I understand your views of the positioning of the Bible on the shelf at the end. But when I viewed the movie I didn't take it that way.
I saw it as the world already had the Torah and the Koran. They didn't help. God still wanted the Bible printed. The other two books had not done anything to provide hope, or even morality.
I guess I just read it differently.
Like the others who have left comments, I saw this film in a more positive light: http://rednow.com/film/general-film/the-book-of-eli-seeing-is-not-knowing
just wondering (#6),
You raised the most interesting question. I agree had Eli, but now let's call him Achmed, walked through the post-apocalyptic wasteland slaughtering people including Christians in the name of Allah and the Quran, the Christians commenting on this movie would be blind with outrage. But since it's Eli in the name of the KJV doing it, the slaughtering violence, viola!, is OK. This is what disturbs me about the film. Of course the movie values the Bible, but *how* it does so needs lots of discernment and even dismissal. It's like asking a sweet Christian married couple to live in a brothel. Hey, it would elevate marriage, after all. Is "The Book of Eli" how we want the world to know how we, Christ-followers, want to elevate the value of the Word of God.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.