Daily Prayers:
- A. Book of Common Prayer
- A. Book of Common Prayer 2
- A. Divine Hours
- A. Evening Prayer (Anglican)
- A. Morning Prayer (Anglican)
- Celtic Prayer
- Creeds of Christendom
- Eastern Orthodox Prayers
- Lectionary
- Liturgy of the Hours
- Missio Dei
Emerging Movement:
- Andrew Jones
- Andrew Perriman
- Anthony Stiff
- Art Boulet
- Bob Robinson
- Br. Maynard
- Dan Kimball
- David Fitch
- Dogwood Abbey
- Ecclesia Network
- Emerging Women
- Eugene Cho
- Henrik Holmgaard
- Jamie Arpin-Ricci
- Jazz Theologian
- John Frye
- John Lagrou
- Jonny Baker
- JR Briggs
- Leonard Hjamarlson
- LeRon Shults
- Lukas McKnight
- Peggy Brown
- Sivin Kit
- Stephen Shields
- Steve McCoy
- Steve Taylor
- Tamara Buchan
- The Practicing Church
- Tim Miekley
- Todd Hiestand
- Tom Smith (RSA)
- Tony Jones
Other sites I frequent:
- Allan Bevere
- Andy Rowell
- Attie Nel
- Barna
- Brad Boydston
- Chris Ridgeway
- CC Blogs
- Don Johnson
- Ed Gilbreath
- Erika Haub (Carney)
- Faith Blogging
- Falsani
- Fr. Rob
- Hummers
- iMonk
- James McGrath
- Jim Martin
- John Stackhouse
- JR Woodward
- Karen Spears Zacharias
- Laura Barringer
- LaVonne Neff
- LeaderFOCUS
- LL Barkat
- Luke/Annika
- Mark Galli
- Mark Roberts
- Michael Kruse
- Nexus
- Owen Youngman
- Ted Gossard
- Tom Wright
Recommended Online Readings:
Scholarly Books I’ve written:
- Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels
- Hist Jesus Anthology
- Interpreting the Synoptic Gospels
- Introducing NT Interpretation
- Jesus and His Death
- Jesus in Memory (ed.)
- New Vision for Israel
- Synoptics: Biblio
- The Face of New Testament Studies
- Who Do They Say I Am?
Scholarship Online:
- Apollos
- Books & Culture
- ChristianityToday
- CS Lewis
- EAC
- Early Xian Writings
- Euaggelion
- Gospels
- Jesus and His Death Blog
- Karl Barth Online
- Mark Goodacre’s Weblog
- Online Journals Access
- Online Pseudepigraph
- Pete Enns
- Prime Time Jesus
- Theopedia
- ThinkTank
Stuff online:
- 5 Streams
- Big Muddy
- Catalyst Scripture
- Catching the Wave
- DaVinci Code
- Forgiveness
- Future or Fad?
- Gospel of Judas
- High Calling
- Interview on Emerging
- Interview with LL Barkat
- IVCF Eikons
- IVCF Gospel
- John Bunyan
- Keys of the Kingdom
- Lake Emerging
- Mary in CT
- Missional in Seattle
- Missional Matrix
- Nativity Story
- Never Alone
- New Perspective
- Pepperdine Interview
- Professor as Scholar
- Recl Mind Mary 1
- Robust Gospel
- Social Justice
- Trojan Horse 2
- WiredParish Mary Interview
- Word/World NPP














posted July 8, 2010 at 9:13 am
Amen on #1! I find that to be very true in my own church. Many people have more fear and unfounded beliefs about Muslims as opposed to true facts. Also, one has to approach the idea of other religions and those different from them selves with an open mind. Otherwise, they will read a list like this not be educated, but rather to build their list of arguments against. I’ve seen Prothero interviewed twice now and I really like what he has to say.
posted July 8, 2010 at 10:30 am
My experience here in the Southwest of France that Islam is as much cultural and Nationalistic as it is religious. So the tension usually arises from cultural and political reasons as much as religious. The French for the most part know little about Islam as well.
posted July 8, 2010 at 10:40 am
What are you doing to understand other religions?
Reading: “Towards a True Kinship of Faith” by H.H. the Dalai Lama. What a fascinating life he’s had, and what an example of openness!
posted July 8, 2010 at 11:00 am
If only we could just love one another…..
The first segment of last nights ‘Daily Show’, where Jon covers the outrage over mosques, could not have been more timely…..look past the humor to a root problem concerning today’s fears, http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/wed-july-7-2010-daniel-okrent
posted July 8, 2010 at 11:29 am
What is the point of the book? What is the point of Prothero using “problem, solution, technique, exemplar” as an organizing template? This 12 point description is not very helpful. It is full of “facts” which offer no insight. Also, the facts are not very factual. I see about 5 outright errors and numerous descriptive inadequacies. (The author/source obviously does not know Arabic either.)
But even if this was followed by fuller descriptions and corrections, it would not lead to more understanding between the communities. We have access to Muslims who can freely express their faith to us. They do not have free access to expressions of Christianity. It is not a conversation.
Also, every Muslim I meet tells me, “You in the West do not understand what Islam really is because you only know what you see in the news.” Then they proceed to educate me, by giving me the party line of the tolerance, moderation, simplicity, and reasonableness of “true Islam.”
You cannot imagine how tiresome it is to hear the same spiel for 15 years. It’s like having people from the Watchtower Society come to your door every single day for years and tell you the exact same thing. And now I have to endure it again at Jesus Creed? Where’s the insight and analysis? (Only points 7 and 8 lightly touch on analysis.)
Sorry to be so grouchy. I know some people really enjoy this kind of list of information; it will help them as they play Christian Trivial Pursuit Genus Edition.
posted July 8, 2010 at 12:09 pm
@ 5
Would you be willing to share which ones on the list you see as errors?
posted July 8, 2010 at 12:18 pm
I think it highly beneficial to learn about other religions. I wouldn’t dissuade anybody from doing so. I will be reading “The History of Islam” by Barry Rubin this summer.
#1 (Pat): I am not sure what you are talking about. Have you ever picked up the Quran or Hadith to find out the basics on Islam? I am going to make the assumption you have not. I will also go so far as to say very few people responding to this thread have ever set foot in an Islamic bookstore or picked up a Quran.
BTW, jihad is not one of the pillars of Islam and Shariah is not something any of us want in any form at any time and while it deserves our inspection, it is not entitled to our embrace at all.
posted July 8, 2010 at 12:32 pm
Richard,
Briefly, a few corrections.
#4 These are not the “pillars”. It’s a common mistake. These are the “obligations”. The pillars are certain necessary beliefs like the belief in angels, the prophets, and the heavenly books.
#5 “shirk” means “association” which is ascribing partners to God. The christian Trinity is condemned as shirk, the worst sin of all.
#7 & #8 & 9Islam’s functional trinity (small t), if you will, Is the Sharia’, Mohammad, and the Qur’an. The Qur’an is somewhat analogous to Jesus in that it is the ultimate revelation of the eternal Word. Mohammad is beyond criticism and never did anything wrong. To criticize him is blasphemy. The Sharia’ and the Sunna (what did Mohammad do – WDMD) tells the believer how to live each day with detailed instructions on most everything.
#9 – Islamic law is so complicated as to be beyond simple summary here.
#10 – “Islamism” what is that? Muslims do not use such terms or categories.
#11 – Most Muslims confess to be “moderate.” What this usually means is that they don’t pray 5 times a day and resent it when people get on their case about it. But the majority of Muslims in the world would seem quite radical and fundamentalist to you if you sat down and found out what they actually believe about Jews, women, apostasy, etc.
posted July 8, 2010 at 12:33 pm
Hi Aaron (#7). I have not read the Quran or Hadith. My comments were directed at the part of #1 which stated that most of us lack knowledge about Islam or Muslims and that we have a hard time being intelligent about it. I clearly am not an expert, having never read the Quran or the Hadith, however I have Muslim relatives and have engaged Muslim co-workers in conversations about faith. Having had those kind of encounters coupled with an open mind helps me to not be fearful. Unfortunately, I can’t say the same for others that I know. Some people draw up stereotypes of Muslims much the way people do for other groups and can’t see or hear anything past their prejudices. I’ve unfortunately witnessed this firsthand via very shortsighted comments that are often made. For instance, I shared with a Sunday School class once that my Pakistani co-worker asked if he could come to church with me sometime (I shared this as I thought it was something to be encouraged about). One lady, without hesitation said, “As long as he doesn’t bring a gun.” This got a round of laughter from the whole class and then they launched into a conversation on profiling (they were of course for it). I quickly brought the conversation to an end to move us back to the lesson, but was quite offended by this exchange. For some people, this is the extent of their knowledge of Islam and this is the kind of thing I’m against. How can you intelligently engage another or learn from them with this type of bias?
posted July 8, 2010 at 2:11 pm
#9 Pat- Thanks for your clarification. I think part of genuine and mature dialog is the willingness to have our bias’ examined/challenged. Seems that didn’t happen in your Sunday School class. Sorry.
But I think your class exhibited a reaction based in fear. But to say their reaction was possibly based in fear doesn’t mean it is without basis. There are justifiable reasons for their fear (see any Lutheran shoe-bombers lately?) and some not so justifiable (all Muslims are not terrorists). However, information is not enough to deal with fear.
posted July 8, 2010 at 3:56 pm
“information is not enough to deal with fear.”
@Aaron #10 – Exactly! Relationships and mature dialogue are key for helping to dispel fear. However, venturing into these relationships can be painful as you deal with the types of insensitivity as I mentioned above. How many people have to be hurt and offended on the way to entering into healthy relationships? On the bright side, our church does have a ministry to internationals, so this could be the entree into establishing healthy relationships and dialogue as long as people do not see every encounter with an international as a proselytizing project, but rather and opportunity to learn, grow and appreciate fellow human beings. We are after all, more than our religious affiliation.
posted July 8, 2010 at 10:39 pm
Professor, can you lay down better the premise of the book- why is Prothero writing exactly?