Recently in University MInistry Category

Here is the question for today - Do you read books by or about women? Intentionally?

This is the third and last in a series of posts centered around a short volume Are Women Human? containing two essays by Dorothy Sayers.  Today I am going to give a couple of quotes from Sayers' essays, make an observation, a suggestion, and open a conversation.

From the essay "The Human-Not-Quite-Human" (page numbers from the 1981 printing of "Are Women Human?")

The first task, when undertaking the study of any phenomenon, is to observe its most obvious feature; and it is here that most students fail. It is here that most students of "The Woman Question" have failed, and the Church more lamentably than most, and with less excuse. That is why it is necessary, from time to time, to speak plainly, and perhaps even brutally, to the Church.

The first thing that strikes the careless observer is that women are unlike men. ... But the fundamental thing is that women are more like men than anything else in the world. They are human beings. Vir is male and Femina is female: but Homo is male and female.

This is the equality that is claimed and the fact that is persistently evaded and denied. No matter what arguments are used, the discussion is vitiated from the start, because Man is always dealt with as both Homo and Vir, but woman as only Femina. (p. 37)

Last Thursday (see here) I started a short series of posts focused on Dorothy Sayers' essays published in the volume Are Women Human?. The first essay in this volume is an address given to a women's society in 1938.  Sayers starts the essay by relating her invitation to speak to the group and noting that she did not consider herself a feminist and did not wish to be identified with feminism.  She did, however, think that "a woman is as good as a man", but goes on to explain what she means by this phrase:

What, I feel, we ought to mean is something so obvious that it is apt to escape attention altogether, viz: not that every woman is, in virtue of her sex, as strong, clever, artistic, level-headed, industrious,and so forth as any man that can be mentioned; but, that a woman is just as much an ordinary human being as a man, with the same individual preferences, and with just as much right to the tastes and preferences of an individual.  What is repugnant to every human being is to be reckoned always as a member of a class and not as an individual. (19)

Classifications and generalizations can be useful - Sayers does not deny this - women tend to be smaller, Swedes tend to be blond ... we can go beyond this to personality traits and abilities. But  such classifications do not define any individual human, male or female,

What does it mean to affirm (for those of us who do) that all men and women are created equal in the image of God? If you don't, why don't you?

We've had extensive conversations on this blog on the issue of women in ministry. The topic comprises the last third of Scot's book The Blue Parakeet: Rethinking How You Read the Bible , and is at the root of many of the contemporary conflicts within our church, including those over tribal translations.  I generally stay on the periphery of these discussion because they always leave me feeling sick - and just a little dirty.

But this is an issue that we cannot avoid - not in the context of "Christian Virtue": and not in the context of "Missional Campus Ministry." One of the most potent criticisms of the church within the academy is directed at the view of women presented by some who purpose to speak for the church - for God - on this matter. As a Christian, a scientist, an academic, and a woman - I find this conflict particularly troubling.  I have been asked how I can be a thinking woman and a Christian much more often than I have been asked how I can be a scientist and a Christian.

A few weeks ago Scot posted a series in Chris Armstrong's book  Patron Saints for Postmoderns: Ten from the Past Who Speak to Our Future.  The final "saint" Armstrong highlighted was Dorothy Sayers, a woman many know as the author of the still popular Lord Peter Wimsey detective novels ... but who also translated Dante and wrote on theology. Dorothy Sayers was an amazing woman, a trailblazer, and a great thinker. She was far from perfect - but that only makes her human.  Or does it? 

There is a short volume Are Women Human? containing two essays by Sayers on this very topic.  Anyone who reads both this book and her novel Gaudy Night will immediately recognize the coherence of her overall view.

I am going to put up a few posts on this book over the next week or so, focused on some of  Sayers' key points. Today  I would like to put forward a brief excerpt from this book and open the floor for discussion.

It has been a while - but the Missional Campus Ministry series will continue on an occasional basis as resources or topics appear.  Today I would like to focus conversation around a recent blog post by John Stackhouse - Campus Ministry That's Not for Every One.  Here is a brief excerpt... speaking about a visit to the University of Ottawa:

But what I liked the most about working with him in producing several events on campus is that he is trying to reach the people most campus groups don't: the thoughtful, and perhaps even threatening, inquirer, the smart student or professor who has been asking hard questions of Christianity perhaps for years and hasn't found even a safe place in which to ask them, let alone a place to encounter satisfying answers to them.

...

It's harder to reach these people on campus, not least because many of them have had previous experiences with religious types and have been disappointed and offended by the defensive, even anti-intellectual, attitude they encountered. So they're not likely now to show up at a "Free Pizza Night!" to "Hear local pastor Rev. Bill Jones speak on loving God better!" Rather than having their hard questions welcomed in the spirit of the university, they have been marginalized as troublesome party-poopers, spoiling a nice session of grooving on Jesus. Or perhaps they indeed have been engaged by Christians, but then their questions have exposed the Christians' intellectual shallowness, their inability to articulate good grounds for their beliefs that make sense beyond the circle of already-convinced faith.

I will like to elaborate on these ideas a bit - focused on discussion of the following question:

What can be done to make an impact on campus - today and in the future, to move beyond "intellectual shallowness" or the perception of such shallowness?

The church I attend has an outstanding youth ministry. No question. And intentionally inter-generational worship. The staff is intent on building relationships. The church is thriving, even growing. The number of families with young children is increasing. And yet ...

My daughter graduated from high school this year.  She has been in this church since we moved here just after her first birthday; she "belongs."  There was a big graduation luncheon - complete with video and moving remembrances (we had known roughly half the 15-20 seniors since they were in preschool); the whirlwind of graduation ceremonies, family visits, and open houses.  And the next Sunday as we prepared to leave for church she informed me that she was now supposed to attend one of the adult education communities ... and as she put it "No Way!" For a time perhaps she no longer belongs.

This leads to the question I would like to address today.

What does your church do to intentionally reach, walk along side, and disciple 18-25 year-olds?

We opened this series with a look as Campus ministry as mission.  This is a theme that is repeated and elaborated by Benson Hines in his blog and book.Hines spent a year touring College and University campuses and talking with...

Yet another academic year approaches - yet another set of fresh new faces on campus. As we approach a the start of term I would like to renew the conversation on campus ministry we began last spring (You can find...