J-Walking

Guest Blogger: Testifying to Stephen Colbert

Tuesday October 24, 2006

Today, guest blogger Patton Dodd, Beliefnet's Christianity Editor who is based in Colorado Springs, comments on the reception of "Tempting Faith":

Though I've had the pleasure of working with David Kuo in recent weeks, like most everyone I read his book only after having the media tell me what it was about. From MSNBC I learned that Kuo's book was a bombshell of revelations on how the Bush White House had absconded its faith-based initiative and mocked religious leaders. From "60 Minutes" I learned that Kuo's main contention was that compassionate conservativism, the centerpiece of Bush's 2000 presidential campaign platform (and a primary reason I voted for him the first time around), was never given one iota of the promised funding. From "Good Morning America" and a host of other interviews I learned that Kuo is arguably a bit naive--expecting a politician to live up to their promises is silly (people don't actually vote based on those promises, do they?)--and that "Tempting Faith" is just the story of a wounded lover.

Then I read "Tempting Faith."

Bombshell revelations? Almost none.

Account of faith-based initiative? Fascinating insider's take, but little new news.

Naivete? Kuo says in his prologue that there's no surprise in politicians being political, but that when Christians vote their faith, they expect something more than mere politics. That's not naivete: it's realism.

The big flaw of "Tempting Faith" isn't naivete; it's that it doesn't assume that religious leaders use Bush as much as Bush uses them. They do, as Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council acknowledged last week.

But here's the "Testing Faith" story that everyone seems to be missing: it's an answer to evangelical prayers.

As the Washington Post reported, James Dobson, Tony Perkins, and other religious readers are incensed about Kuo's book. Instead, they should be thanking God for it. People who care about Jesus should be gladdened by Kuo's moment in the spotlight. He may be saying harsh things about the Bush White House; he may claim that evangelical leaders are uncricitcal in their support of the Right; but he is also--cleary and repeatedly--testifying about Jesus.

When evangelicals talk about a wanting a godly nation, they aren't talking about theocracy. What they are talking about is the spread of the gospel--more and more people discovering the good news of Jesus, which is that God loves them and wants to restore them along with the eventual restoration of all things. It's tough to remember this, and tough to believe it, in a time when evangelicalism has become so tied into the politics of morality and the platform of one party. Even some evangelicals forget that the work of the gospel isn't a political project. But, media representations to the contrary, many evangelicals don't forget. And when most evangelicals pray for America or advocate for more Christianity in their nation, what they mean is that they want people to know about Jesus. Not to force Jesus down anyone's throat, but just to give people a chance to hear good news.

"Tempting Faith" is David Kuo's story of embracing this good news--then forgetting it, then remembering it, becoming confused about it, and trying again to live by it. That's the story of every Christian. Kuo's story takes place in the context of another smaller (not larger) story about contemporary American politics, but the main tale is about one man learning to follow God.

With "Tempting Faith," we have something evangelicals ask God for all the time: a testimony of faith coming from within mainstream culture. Evangelicals are forever talking about "engaging the culture" and being relevant and making sure that they don't become so subcultural that no one has a chance to hear about Jesus. Right now, with David Kuo's book, evangelicals are getting what they hoped for.

In the opening pages, Kuo shares his story of coming to know Jesus. Throughout the book, he writes openly of the very real struggles Christians face in following Jesus. On television and radio last week, Kuo alluded to this story again and again. On "The Colbert Report," he said the words, "Jesus rose from the dead."

Christians, take note: David Kuo is telling his story of following Jesus, and he's been given a huge platform on which to tell it. His testimony isn't as juicy as his stories about Bush and Beltway politics, but it's his central story, and--here's a bit of Christian naivete for you--it's the story that'll last.
Comments
Dale
October 29, 2006 3:15 PM
http://theoblogical.org

Dr. Parentis, You say Kuo "presents salacious and unsubstantiated stories about others. He certainly would not have soiled His name by doing this shortly before an election, thereby making it seem He is just another spiteful knife player in a political game. " Is this charge that this is a political maneuver not playing the very same game you say you abhor? The fact that you can (and even want to) hurl charges of "salacious and unsubstantiated" belies your entire premise, and places you squarely in that camp. While I am not convinced that Kuo is totally free of this fallacy either, you seem blind to your own participation in the very same games. Dale

D. Simon Parentis
October 29, 2006 10:04 PM
HASH(0x9281cdc)

Dale asks: Is this charge that this is a political maneuver not playing the very same game you say you abhor?
No. It is not. I make no charge. I think Kuo s motives are suspect, that his behavior is not above reproach because it is mere he said/she said hearsay, with no hard evidence of truth behind it. It is offered with ridicule that implies evangelicals need Kuo to point out there is a difference between George Bush and God Almighty. It also comes at a time when it can do maximum political damage to the very people he criticizes. And, lastly, it is done for cold cash. None of these sorts of things apply to me. None are like anything Jesus has done or would do, based upon His prior example. They all apply to Kuo, and demonstrably so. Dale said: The fact that you can (and even want to) hurl charges of "salacious and unsubstantiated" belies your entire premise, and places you squarely in that camp.
The definition of salacious I used was an indecent gesture or comment. The definition I used of the word unsubstantiated was unsupported by other evidence. When Kuo claims Karl Rove said I don t care. Just get me an F**king Faith-based thing , he offers us both a salacious and unsubstantiated comment. It may all be true. But without evidence, it still mere political gossip, and it does not become a believer. My position stands. Dale said: While I am not convinced that Kuo is totally free of this fallacy either, you seem blind to your own participation in the very same games.
Perhaps, but I do not think so.

Dennis Castle
October 29, 2006 10:27 PM
HASH(0x918f3b8)

It's a convenient argument that Dale makes, by saying that calling someone out for indecent comments makes you guilty of the same crime means that nobody can legitimately call someone out. Convenient, but not clever. I've noticed not one of Kuo's adherents have addressed any (not one) point that his critics (in the classic sense) on any of these threads have made. All they've done is hurl invective back or said the equivalent of "O huh". Leads me to believe that Kuo is a phony or a dupe, and those that follow him are the same.

djchuang
October 31, 2006 12:55 PM
http://djchuang.com/

David, congratulations on your new book being published, and finding your faith fresh and anew, amidst quite a roller coaster ride inside the Beltway!

Patti Blount
October 31, 2006 4:29 PM
thissamejesus.blogspot.com

I haven't finished the book, so some might not think my comment is valid, but I'll give it anyway. I bought the book because I was hoping it gave some validity to something that I believe about following Jesus and politics. The summary of it seemed to be suggestive of that. I honestly believe that the political system is set up by worldly values and ideologies exhalting man with power, fame, and money. If a Christian gets involved and thinks he can change the system, then that won't happen. Eventually they will "bow the knee to Baal" or be stoked in the fire as the Hebrew boys were. I was hoping David had seen the truth of that in politics, sought God about his life, and got out completely. I had hoped that he would see that the "platoons" he wrote about were the place he needed to be, and that the Big Ship of man's politics was only and illusion-not really something that was laying up treasures in heaven at all, but that men with their trophies already had their reward. One day the kingdoms of men will be replaced with the Kingdom of our God and Lord according to God's revelation. Why not get on the boat now instead of wasting time and effort trying to impact that which will only try to rob you of your salvation through Jesus Christ? Like I said, David may have gotten out completely and is now personally denying himself and helping others and letting his light shine in this way. I hope so. I'll find out when I complete the book. "My kingdom is not of this world. If it was my followers would be fighting for Me." Jesus Christ. True then, true now.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About J-Walking

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from J-Walking

About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement