|
Previous Posts
Dancing... or drinking through life
I am not even sure that I know how to do a link anymore. I'm giving it a shot though so, three readers, please forgive me if I mess this up.
So Rod Dreher's sister is battling cancer. It is nasty. Their faith is extraordinary. Here's his latest post (I think)
There are 8 comments on it.
As I scrolle
posted 3:05:22pm Mar. 02, 2010 |
read full post
»
Back...
I'm back here at JWalking after a bit of time because I just want someplace to record thoughts from time to time. I doubt that many of the thoughts will be political - there are plenty upon plenty of people offering their opinions on everything political and I doubt that I have much to add that will
posted 10:44:56pm Mar. 01, 2010 |
read full post
»
Learning to tell a story
For the last ten months or so I've been engaged in a completely different world - the world of screenwriting. It began as a writing project - probably the 21st Century version of a yen to write the great American novel - a shot at a screenplay. I knew that I knew nothing about the art but was inspir
posted 8:01:41pm Feb. 28, 2010 |
read full post
»
And just one more
I have, I think, just one more round of chemo left.
When I go through my pill popping regimen tomorrow morning it will be the last time for this particular round of drugs. Twenty-three rounds, it seems, is enough.
What comes next? We'll go back to what we did after the surgery. We'll watch and measu
posted 11:38:45pm Nov. 18, 2008 |
read full post
»
A Newfie for Obama
NPR asked me to do a short memo to the president-elect. I chose to do it on the dog he should choose... and why. Check it out.
posted 12:25:10am Nov. 15, 2008 |
read full post
»
|
posted July 5, 2007 at 2:07 pm
Amen! – Pete A.
posted July 5, 2007 at 3:11 pm
I am game, David. I think I lot of the bickering on here is due to many people — liberal, conservative, centrist, liberiterian, etc., believing that what is wrong with society can be solved by politics — electing the right party or candidate when the real solution is much deeper.
Maybe we all just need to get the log out of our eye before we can see clearly enough to help take the speck out of our brother’s.
posted July 5, 2007 at 4:18 pm
So are you going to change your last post to “how to thank the ‘l’ word?” ;0)
posted July 5, 2007 at 4:20 pm
Sorry, that should have been “thank an ‘l’ word”, not “how to”.
posted July 5, 2007 at 4:34 pm
Perhaps our almost instant rush to sarcasm – a cultural malady – contributes to the stereotyping kinds of comments. The words “Liberal” and “conservative” no longer have much meaning. Both are used to demonize, both used in a manner that guarantees self-righteous cynicism. “They” could’t mean that apology. “they are insincere”. That certainly creates a world in which our loyalties involve those who hate like we do. The L & C words are used in churches, government, and schools to divide those world into false groups of “good and Evil”. Self examination – the capacity for constructive self examination – can guarantee a lessening of such a need to divide the world. Every night, I go to bed and think – what could I have done more lovingly today. What was the joy in my day. Where did I find God today. It is an old Jesuit tradition called the “examen”. It has changed my way of looking at the world over the years.
posted July 5, 2007 at 4:38 pm
Kat – Yes, yes I will. Though I do hope everyone understands that one of the reasons I loved it was because it was so over the top. David
posted July 5, 2007 at 5:54 pm
David, I saw that you changed the post, thanks for the laugh!
About the gist of your post; I agree that the way we communicate about political issues in this country is pretty brutal. Its not just conservatives and liberals going for the jugular with each other. Check out the web or talk radio when a Democrat or Republican goes against whatever the popular issue of the moment is. The words from their own are just as scathing.
posted July 5, 2007 at 6:26 pm
A good idea, David. But the troubled will likely not give us such peace.
In my faith tradition the view is taken, through long experience, that people (termed Ranters in our internal history) who badger us with vehement but wrongful assertions and invective are to be treated with care and understanding. But integrity and kindness does not lie in silence alone. The Ranter too, for all that is wrong about his thinking, is a creature of God’s. His queries do contain and pose a Divine question to us, though commonly obscured by the hideous garb in which it is clothed.
posted July 5, 2007 at 9:04 pm
Jillian – Right on. And I’m not wanting to squash anyone, just hoping that perhaps if we can lose the “labels” maybe our conversations might produce some fruit.
posted July 5, 2007 at 9:45 pm
Odd that humans are most argumentative about the things that are the most poorly understood and cannot be readily determined.