J-Walking

Larry Craig must resign

Thursday August 30, 2007

Categories: Politics

A United States Senator is held - or should be held - to a higher standard. Sen. Larry Craig's behavior doesn't pass a lower standard. He should resign.

Some will say that there is a double standard, that Democrats get away with more than Republicans; that when Democrats get in trouble the "media" doesn't focus on their problems as much. In some cases that may be true. I don't think this is one of them.

Advertisement
Comments
canucklehead
August 31, 2007 1:29 PM

This just in from my neighbors to the immediate south in Cour d'Alene:

"In honor of Senator Larry Craig, the state of Idaho will officially change the slogan on its license plate to FAMOUS POTATOHEADS effective Sept 1/07"

canucklehead
August 31, 2007 1:37 PM

>>"I read the account of what actually went down in the bathroom stall..." Reddopto

Unless you were actually there, you don't know what "actually went down in the bathroom stall." All you know is what somebody claims went down in the bathroom stall.

And I'm assuming that your reference to "what actually went down" means before they flushed??

Anonymous
September 1, 2007 6:06 PM

I believe Senator Craig should resign. He has brought dishonor to the Senate, and his effectiveness is greatly reduced by his hypocricy and double standards. However, I also would have wanted Senator Vitter to resign for conduct unbecoming of a senator (as well as for his hypocricy), Attorney General Gonzales to resign (earlier) for politicizing the Justice Dept. and for selective and false recollections (despite having months of time to review and prepare before his Congressional hearings), Mr. Rove to resign for outing a CIA agent, and Mr. Libby to serve time for perjury. Alas, President Bush's pledge to restore honor and integrity to the White House and the Republican Party's commitment to "Christian" values have failed miserably, at least in these individual cases. But do these cases illustrate a pattern? I find Senator Craig's double life and hypocricy disturbing; however, I also find the Reupblican Party's quick (and I believe, primarily self-serving)efforts to cast Mr. Craig aside to be equally hypocritcal. To me, the offenses by some of these other high officials were illegal, dishnorable, and shameful. Yet, many in the Republican party have looked the other way while rushing to cast their first stones at Mr. Craig.

Gloria
September 2, 2007 7:41 AM

If the Republican party would return to their old base of Goldwater principles, of less govt. control and "live and let live" and particularly separation of church and state, I don't think this case would push the war on poverty, medical care, replacing bridges, mine safety etc.off the front pages. What most people are fed up with is the hypocrisy involved. The religious neo cons attack everyone that doesn't agree with them unmercifully and have never figured out that a homosexual wouldn't choose his life style, he is born with it.

I agree that anyone should be arrested for having sex in a public bathroom where children may come in. I am a married heterosexual so it is hard for me to understand these acts but my main objection is that the Senator preached his Christianity and yet didn't even know the first code (i.e. DO NOT THROW THE FIRST STONE) He has been ranting against the homosexuals so it was just a matter of time before it came around and hit him with his pants down. When are some of these politicians going to try to understand what Jesus was preaching and get busy trying to run the country instead of trying to control our lives. Jesus said go to your closet (he didn't mean it the way the Senator took it) He meant don't scream out your Holier then thou statements in any pulpit but look within to find God and comfort.

MRS M
September 8, 2007 3:32 PM

FOLKS-- it is a sad day that we even have to have police staking things out in the bathrooms of our public areas!HOWEVER- More of this will happen to others by all kinds of odd folks that are homosexuals or even transgendered. But I think the dirty sex-minded folks should have their own bathrooms! --and not use normal folks PUBLIC bathrooms to create shock among the occupants that are not into this kind of thing.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

About J-Walking

This blog is no longer updated and is closed for comments. We welcome your comments about Christianity in our Christianity forums.

Read David Kuo's bio

Search This Blog

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.